Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Neverstop said:Then that is judicial activism tantamount to rewriting the Constitution.
Neverstop said:It is obvious.
Plus, it doesn't change the fact it is on government property. Endorsing any religion violates the Constitution.
christianmarine said:Sorry brother, but as a former member of the armed forces, don't you know that there are chapels on government property? It's endorsement of religion, albeit not a specific one, but religion none the less.
Neverstop said:Wow...that's stretching/twisting it even more! However, "Congress shall pass no law respecting the establishment of a religion" is clear enough.
Neverstop said:It is an endorsement of religion, and as such, it does violate the Constitution. It's one of those things that is very tricky.
12volt_man said:You haven't answered the question.
How does the government's acknowledgement of religion or respecting a citizens religious wishes equal establishing a religion?
Neverstop said:I've often questioned the validity of those as well. On the one hand, they make sense because troops have different religious backgrounds, though most are Chrstian of some sort. The chapels and chaplains are there because of the nomadic environment of military life.
It is an endorsement of religion, and as such, it does violate the Constitution. It's one of those things that is very tricky.
Neverstop said:Look at Arlington...is anyone really trying to tell me Christianity has not be established in some form? Please.
Any Constitution respecting citizen would not ask the government for wishes regarding their private faith.
12volt_man said:How has Christianity been established at Arlington National Cemetary?
I didn't say that they would but it's still traditional to mark someone's grave with the appropriate religious symbols and it is a sign of respect to that person for the service that they've given that the government marks their grave with such.
christianmarine said:In all honesty brother, you are the only that has openly questioned that here on the forum. I have brought that up against others on this site that cry about Christian symbolism, yet their tax dollars support chaplains of all religions. Gotta say, reps to you man. We disagree on this, but at least you've got some fortitude.
Neverstop said:Maybe some do not understand what is meant by the "establishment of religion." It does not mean priests have to be there...
Here in Boston, there are the Granary Burial grounds...these date back a few hundred years...completely Christian communities...know how many crosses mark graves? ZERO....wonder why? Surely it's a cultural thing, but it's interesting.
How many graves has the US government marked that are non-Christian but religious nonetheless?
Neverstop said:Maybe some do not understand what is meant by the "establishment of religion." It does not mean priests have to be there...
How many graves has the US government marked that are non-Christian but religious nonetheless?
12volt_man said:OK. Just to clear up the confusion, why don't you take a minute to explain to us what is meant by the "establishment of religion" as it appears in the 1st Amendment?
Walk through any veterans cemetary and you will also see grave markers that honor that person's Judaism, Islam, and other beliefs, or no beliefs at all.
Neverstop said:Not actually "stepped" into it, but been to DC several times and have seen it. Why?
Neverstop said:No State Religion and No State can pass laws based on religion.
I've been to a few Veterans cemeteries but we were specifically talking about Arlington.