Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You said there was a fatal flaw in evolution but are then unable to explain what that is.
Then again, what should we expect from someone who lies about being a geology professor?
So Francisco Ayala doesn't believe in God, even though he is an ordained priest, and has a list of scientific honours as long as your arm.
I guess he must be a TE. I told you TE is special. They use God to mend holes of evolution.
No they don't. That is what Michael Behe does - or at least the holes he can persuade nobody else are there to need mending.
Once I proposed God makes evolution. So evolution works without the need of God afterward. But TE people criticized it as an idea of deism. If so, they must be aware of that evolution can not work on itself.
Given your level of openness and honesty, I'm dubious about your description of other peoples beliefs. Got some links as evidence?
I do find many problems about evolution. God won't make such a stupid system. It will not work on itself.
I was going to reply to your first sentence.
Then I see your second sentence. It changed my mind.
No explanation for you. Sorry.
He doesn't need an explanation -- he's given it.
You're caught, Juven... again. Soon there won't be anyone on this forum who doesn't know you for what you really are.
Once I proposed God makes evolution. So evolution works without the need of God afterward. But TE people criticized it as an idea of deism. If so, they must be aware of that evolution can not work on itself.
You know me (?), but you still beg me for info.
It would be deism if they said that God had no concern for the outcome of Evolution, but that concern does not imply that he has to be constantly intervening along the way.
No need to be a constant or frequent or occasional intervention. Just once would be more than enough.
It says that the evolution process can not function as it is suggested by evolutionist.
So TE people are actually against the scientific evolution process. They do see big problems in that and can only call God to help.
Or simply did not function that way...
By that "logic," Theists are against everything scientific -- every answered prayer is nothing more than God stacking the deck in one's favor.
Not everything, but something.
Are you a scientist? Do not exaggerate observations.
You are forgiven if you are not one.
Are you going to explain that statement or make an excuse not to?
You're saying that theists never pray for God to invalidate biology, medicine, physics, chemistry, biology, zoology, meteorology, psychology, etc., etc., by skewing results in their favor?
Or are you saying God never answers such prayers?
I never tried to pass myself off as something I'm not -- how about you?
I was going to reply to your first sentence.
Then I see your second sentence. It changed my mind.
No explanation for you. Sorry.
Because I exposed your lies? Fine
Other people have asked for an explanation - you can answer them instead.
If you can't actually explain what you think is wrong with evolution, your criticisms must be disregarded.
ALL examples of evolution are isolated cases. That is what's wrong.
Miracles are intended for a single person who prayed for it. For everyone else, what happened is either 100% scientific (or reasonable), or is not interpretable "yet".
What should I explain?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?