So? That didn't invalidate the logic we were using before. We just found better information about how logic works in one particular case.
Speculation. On what basis do you conclude that knowing everything requires a new form of logic.
I think that these two points get to the crux of what I've been at least trying to express, and my recent commentary with ophiolite I would say helps here.
You said "We found better information about how logic works".
And that's what I'm saying. As ophiolite assisted with, it's the application of logic and the development of logical premises that has improved with time. Meaning that over time we are able to construct logical premises that relate to topics that historically we could not have even fathomed.
Aristotle couldn't even fathom the concept of gravitational force, and thus his logic only occurred in a limited sphere of understanding. Some dare to call his logic false. But while it's not necessarily false it's just limited in scope.
If you told him that particles could be in multiple places at once, he would probably say that you were crazy. But if you pick them up and put them in the 21st century and taught them about quantum mechanics, then all of a sudden this logical conclusion that an object could be a multiple places at once now make sense.
And thus whatever logical arguments existed relating to this topic would be transformed.
And so it's not that a new form of logic is needed but rather it's information necessary to construct the premises that are needed to even understand how to apply the logic.
To be able to apply logic in its perfect form where all premises are true and you know of all logical premises of every possible argument, you would need knowledge of everything.
And so when we look at things like questions of why radioactive elements decay and emit particles at times that we can't predict and in directions that we can't predict, and we aren't really sure why a particle is emitted at one moment versus another, I would say that this is a lack of knowledge of everything.
And that lack of knowledge of everything (at least pertaining to the functions of subatomic particles) demonstrates an inability for us to formulate all possible logical explanations for it.
Therefore, the window is open for divine explanation and intervention.