• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Creationist Statements

daniel192

If God created the Universe, than who created God?
Dec 30, 2009
46
1
Ísafjörður
✟22,672.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Good for nature.

I'm talking about genetic engineering now --- inside of a laboratory.

Nature doesn't have a monopoly on creating mutants, does she?
Cherry picker.
As far as I know, yes, you can create a new race. Want a blue, green, red or violet one, be my guest.

Nature is a "she"? Then space is he?
 
Upvote 0

Agonaces of Susa

Evolution is not science: legalize creationism.
Nov 18, 2009
3,605
50
San Diego
Visit site
✟19,153.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life
Do you know what that means?
It means that Darwin was a proto-Nazi and Hitler was a Darwinist.
 
Upvote 0

FreezBee

Veteran
Nov 1, 2005
1,306
44
Southern Copenhagen
✟1,704.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Second, Darwinism and Nazism are the exact same thing.

Ok, if by 'Darwinism' you mean 'Nazism', why don't you just say 'Nazism'? That migh help people not to get you wrong.

Agonaces of Susa said:
"The deepest and ultimate reason for the decline of the old Reich lay in its failure to recognize the racial problem and its importance for the historical evolution of peoples. For events in the lives of peoples are not expressions of chance, but processes related to the self-preservation and propagation of the species and the race and subject to the laws of Nature, even if people are not conscious of the inner reason for their actions." -- Adolf Hitler, Führer, 1925

But what were these laws of nature?

(We'll save this question a short while).

Agonaces of Susa said:
"... struggle is always a means for improving a species' health and power of resistance and, therefore, a cause of its higher evolution. If the process were different, all further evolution would cease and the opposite would occur." -- Adolf Hitler, Führer, 1925

Let's take a bit more, shall we?

From Mein Kampf, Chapter 11:

[SIZE=+1]The consequence of this racial purity, universally valid in Nature, is not only the sharp outward delimitation of the various races, but their uniform character in themselves. The fox is always a fox, the goose a goose, the tiger a tiger, etc., and the difference can lie at most in the varying measure of force, strength, intelligence, dexterity, endurance, etc., of the individual specimens. But you will never find a fox who in his inner attitude might, for example, show humanitarian tendencies toward geese, as similarly there is no cat with a friendly inclination toward mice.
dot.gif
Therefore, here, too, the struggle among themselves arises less from inner aversion than from hunger and love. In both cases, Nature looks on calmly, with satisfaction, in fact. In the struggle for daily bread all those who are weak and sickly or less determined succumb, while the struggle of the males for the female grants the right or opportunity to propagate only to the healthiest. And struggle is always a means for improving a species' health and power of resistance and, therefore, a cause of its higher development.[/SIZE]

Look at the paragraph preceding the one quoted by you. As you can see from this paragraph, Hitler was an essentialist; that is, he believed that each species possessed an unalterable essence that could not change, whereas, as you know, Darwinists believe in common descent; that is that there is no speciel essence for every species, because all species have come from the same common ancestor and therefore share the same essence.

'The law of nature' that each species maintains its identity is certainly not Darwinist.

Agonaces of Susa said:
"National Socialism is nothing but applied biology." -- Rudolph Hess, Deputy Führer, 1934

"National Socialism is applied biology." -- Hans Schemm, Nazi Education Minister and president of the Nazi Teacher's Association, 1935

"Darwin would be astounded at the progress we're going to make in one year as we move the human race forward." -- Reinhard Heydrich, Chief of Police, January 20th 1942

Workin' in a quote mine
Goin' down down down
Workin' in a quote mine
Whop! about to slip down
Workin' in a quote mine
Goin' down down down
Workin' in a quote mine
Whop! about to slip down
Five o'clock in the mornin'
I'm all ready up and gone
Lord I am so tired
How long can this go on?

(Sorry Lee, I promise it won't happen again)
Agonaces of Susa said:
Adolf Hitler named his book My Struggle (1925) after Charles Darwin's book title The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (1859).

Of course he didn't. The title alludes to his struggle against the lies that his opponents were spreading about him.


- FreezBee
 
Upvote 0

Biologist

Regular Member
Jul 14, 2006
516
39
✟4,206.00
Faith
Pantheist
"... struggle is always a means for improving a species' health and power of resistance and, therefore, a cause of its higher evolution. If the process were different, all further evolution would cease and the opposite would occur." -- Adolf Hitler, Fuhrer, 1925

Site a source on this quote please!
Resolved.

alt+f "health and power"

They completely change the quote(which is why you can't find them) and thus the meaning. <staff edit>

[URL="http://www.christianforums.com/users/253233/" said:
Agonaces of Susa[/url]] Unlike Darwinists, I don't believe everything I read on the internet.
Doesn't look like it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Agonaces of Susa

Evolution is not science: legalize creationism.
Nov 18, 2009
3,605
50
San Diego
Visit site
✟19,153.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
But what were these laws of nature?
They aren't laws of nature.

Proto-Nazis like Charles Darwin and Darwinists like Adolf Hitler thought they were.
 
Upvote 0

Agonaces of Susa

Evolution is not science: legalize creationism.
Nov 18, 2009
3,605
50
San Diego
Visit site
✟19,153.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
They completely change the quote(which is why you can't find them) and thus the meaning.
The German word is Entwicklung which means evolution.

Illiteracy and ignorance for atheism strikes again.
 
Upvote 0

Freysinn

You're on my noughty list!
Dec 18, 2009
86
3
Reykjavík, Iceland
✟15,232.00
Faith
Atheist
The German word is Entwicklung which means evolution.

Illiteracy and ignorance for atheism strikes again.
The english word evolution means a slow change and where exacly does he say entwicklung in context with the supperiority of white men.

Ignorance of creationists strikes again.
 
Upvote 0

Biologist

Regular Member
Jul 14, 2006
516
39
✟4,206.00
Faith
Pantheist
The German word is Entwicklung which means evolution.

Illiteracy and ignorance for atheism strikes again.
It can actually mean several things.

Are you going to accept my challenge for a formal debate?

Better yet, I challenge you to a formal debate:

I will present the argument that Hitler was Christian when he wrote Mein Kampf and on the day that the first Jews were murdered. However, I will also make the point that his crimes were inspired by racism not his religion.

You can make the argument that Hitler was Atheist or Non-religious at the time of writing my Kampf and on the day the first Jews were murdered. You can also present a link between Darwin's writings and Hitler's killing.

This, has got to end somewhere. I will draw up the rules once I get of from work, but you can go ahead and start gathering sources and writing your thesis.
 
Upvote 0

Agonaces of Susa

Evolution is not science: legalize creationism.
Nov 18, 2009
3,605
50
San Diego
Visit site
✟19,153.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Are you going to accept my challenge for a formal debate?
Absolutely. What are we debating?

Better yet, I challenge you to a formal debate:

I will present the argument that Hitler was Christian when he wrote Mein Kampf and on the day that the first Jews were murdered. However, I will also make the point that his crimes were inspired by racism not his religion.

You can make the argument that Hitler was Atheist or Non-religious at the time of writing my Kampf and on the day the first Jews were murdered. You can also present a link between Darwin's writings and Hitler's killing.

This, has got to end somewhere. I will draw up the rules once I get of from work, but you can go ahead and start gathering sources and writing your thesis.
I don't accept the terms of this debate.
 
Upvote 0

Biologist

Regular Member
Jul 14, 2006
516
39
✟4,206.00
Faith
Pantheist
Absolutely. What are we debating?


I don't accept the terms of this debate.
I will draw up better terms later or you can draw them up now.

The theme will be Hitler and Evolution. Right now I'm at work so time is too limited for me to draw up good and fair terms.

Anyways, just an acceptance to debate with the theme Hitler and Evolution is all I want.
 
Upvote 0

Freysinn

You're on my noughty list!
Dec 18, 2009
86
3
Reykjavík, Iceland
✟15,232.00
Faith
Atheist
They aren't laws of nature.

Proto-Nazis like Charles Darwin and Darwinists like Adolf Hitler thought they were.

Charles Darwin, was not a nazi. You have absolutely no data to support that outragous claim! Have you no shame? Attacking a dead man with nothing to back it up is just sad. Showing your complete lack of evidence against evolution, a textbook example of godwins law and engaging in the ad hominem fallacy.
 
Upvote 0

Agonaces of Susa

Evolution is not science: legalize creationism.
Nov 18, 2009
3,605
50
San Diego
Visit site
✟19,153.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Charles Darwin, was not a nazi. You have absolutely no data to support that outragous claim! Have you no shame? Attacking a dead man with nothing to back it up is just sad. Showing your complete lack of evidence against evolution, a textbook example of godwins law and engaging in the ad hominem fallacy.
Charles Darwin was a racist and his cousin Francis Galton was even more racist. Those are facts not fallacies.

Anyway, the point is that the Nazi Party was a Darwinist Party.

"National Socialism is nothing but applied biology." -- Rudolph Hess, Deputy Führer, 1934

"National Socialism is applied biology." -- Hans Schemm, Nazi Education Minister and president of the Nazi Teacher's Association, 1935

"Darwin would be astounded at the progress we're going to make in one year as we move the human race forward." -- Reinhard Heydrich, Chief of Police, January 20th 1942
 
Upvote 0

Agonaces of Susa

Evolution is not science: legalize creationism.
Nov 18, 2009
3,605
50
San Diego
Visit site
✟19,153.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
I will draw up better terms later or you can draw them up now.

The theme will be Hitler and Evolution. Right now I'm at work so time is too limited for me to draw up good and fair terms.

Anyways, just an acceptance to debate with the theme Hitler and Evolution is all I want.
Sure.
 
Upvote 0

Freysinn

You're on my noughty list!
Dec 18, 2009
86
3
Reykjavík, Iceland
✟15,232.00
Faith
Atheist
Charles Darwin was a racist and his cousin Francis Galton was even more racist. Those are facts not fallacies.
Sources?
Anyway, the point is that the Nazi Party was a Darwinist Party.

"National Socialism is nothing but applied biology." -- Rudolph Hess, Deputy Führer, 1934

"National Socialism is applied biology." -- Hans Schemm, Nazi Education Minister and president of the Nazi Teacher's Association, 1935

"Darwin would be astounded at the progress we're going to make in one year as we move the human race forward." -- Reinhard Heydrich, Chief of Police, January 20th 1942
Yet the founder of this "darwinist party" said:​
"The fox remains always a fox, the goose remains a goose, and the tiger will retain the character of a tiger." - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, vol. i, ch. xi


Anyway, i smell quote mining on your half, source?
 
Upvote 0