Creation - The Micro & The Macro

[FreeinChrist]

ADVISOR HAT

This thread is closed for review. This forum is NOT the place for flat earth discussions or conspiracy theories. ​

 

[FreeinChrist]

ADVISOR HAT


This thread was moved to Conspiracy Theories which better its the contend of this thread. Reopening​

 

[Apple Sky]

At the end of days when the sky scrolls back, is this a new earth being born ?

 

[Strong in Him]

Could we be the cells within Gods body that have grown in number since the beginning ?

God is Spirit - he doesn't have a body.

Could the universe be the result of it being impregnated ?

What does Genesis say?

 

[T.i.m.o.t.h.y.]

At the end of days when the sky scrolls back, is this a new earth being born ?

No. The verses don't use the words 'new earth'. It instead describes an atomic bomb explosion. Watch a video that shows the exploding bomb, the heated clouds turns toward itself while the surrounding air outside it moves back from the mushroom effect like drawn curtains. So it fittingly depicts "the sky scrolls back". Rev.6:14, referring to Isa.34:4.

The new earth verse uses the words 'new earth' later in the narrative of Rev.21:1, referring to 2Pet.3:13, referring to Isa.65:17, 66:22.

 

[Apple Sky]

The Land of Luz

Just as the human body contains a series of chakras, or subtle energy centres, linked by the sushumna, a central channel in the spinal cord, so there may be corresponding energy centres on and in the body of the earth. Shambhala is sometimes described as the main power centre, with auxiliary centres scattered about the earth. In theosophy, the heart of mother earth is said to beat 'under the foot of sacred Shambhala', and we are told;

That teaching corroborates the popular tradition which asserts the existence of a fountain of life in the bowels of the earth and in the North Pole. It is the blood of the earth, the electro-magnetic current, which circulates through all the arteries; and which is said to be found stored in the naval of the earth.

Some Hebrew legends speak of a place called Luz. And this place can be found at the naval of the earth, which resides directly under the North Star (Polaris). This is where maybe we will find the Tree of Life Tree of Life .

The Tree of Life

The Tree of Life which is called by many names i.e. the Black rock, Mount Zion & Mount Muru. This tree of life may connect the earth to God's his throne, in this area we also have the Northen lights the ( Aurora borealis )

New King James Version
And He who sat there was like a jasper and a sardius stone in appearance; and there was a rainbow around the throne, in appearance like an emerald.

In the micro this tree of life may represent our spines which leads up to our brains, therefore in the Macro the tree of life may leads up the Brain of God, his throne.

 

[T.i.m.o.t.h.y.]

The Land of Luz

Just as the human body contains a series of chakras, or subtle energy centres, linked by the sushumna, a central channel in the spinal cord, so there may be corresponding energy centres on and in the body of the earth. Shambhala is sometimes described as the main power centre, with auxiliary centres scattered about the earth. In theosophy, the heart of mother earth is said to beat 'under the foot of sacred Shambhala', and we are told;



Some Hebrew legends speak of a place called Luz. And this place can be found at the naval of the earth, which resides directly under the North Star (Polaris). This is where maybe we will find the Tree of Life Tree of Life .

The Tree of Life

The Tree of Life which is called by many names i.e. the Black rock, Mount Zion & Mount Muru. This tree of life may connect the earth to God's his throne, in this area we also have the Northen lights the ( Aurora borealis )



In the micro this tree of life may represent our spines which leads up to our brains, therefore in the Macro the tree of life may leads up the Brain of God, his throne.

Your references are not biblical but pagan and therefore should not be believed or dabbled in by any Christian.

But concerning God and His word.. Provs.11:30 and 15:4 states what and where the tree of life is.
As well as Provs.13:14, 10:11, 14:27, 16:22 concerning the fountain of life. They are not in some geographic location but right under your nose. Psalms 36:9 says that God is the fountain of life. Jesus said in Jn.17:39 that out of our inner beings shall flow rivers of living water. Thus he spoke of the Holy Spirit.

Anyone who is looking outside themselves for a natural tree of life or for a natural fountain of life will not ever find them.

 

[Apple Sky]

Your references are not biblical but pagan and therefore should not be believed or dabbled in by any Christian.

But concerning God and His word.. Provs.11:30 and 15:4 states what and where the tree of life is.
As well as Provs.13:14, 10:11, 14:27, 16:22 concerning the fountain of life. They are not in some geographic location but right under your nose. Psalms 36:9 says that God is the fountain of life. Jesus said in Jn.17:39 that out of our inner beings shall flow rivers of living water. Thus he spoke of the Holy Spirit.

Anyone who is looking outside themselves for a natural tree of life or for a natural fountain of life will not ever find them.

This thread is all about hypothesizing/ theory & should not be taken seriously, I say this in my OP.

 

[Strong in Him]

This thread is all about hypothesizing/ theory & should not be taken seriously, I say this in my OP.

No, you said it's a theory.

Hypothesising and not taking something seriously are 2 different things.
A theory is an idea which may, or may not, be able to be proved.
Something which is hypothetical suggests it could become reality - "Hypothetically, if I were to say .... , what would your reaction be?"
Not taking something seriously suggests "this is a bit of a laugh, I'm having a joke, I clearly don't mean it."

Either your OP is a theory; you are undecided about it but are waiting for someone to say "spot on; you're quite right" or "that makes sense, and I can prove it."
Or your post was in the nature of "this is a good joke/fantasy; let's have a bit of fun and see how many people I can fool."

 

[Apple Sky]

No, you said it's a theory.

Hypothesising and not taking something seriously are 2 different things.
A theory is an idea which may, or may not, be able to be proved.
Something which is hypothetical suggests it could become reality - "Hypothetically, if I were to say .... , what would your reaction be?"

If this is the case then my post was a theory.

 

[T.i.m.o.t.h.y.]

This thread is all about hypothesizing/ theory & should not be taken seriously, I say this in my OP.

Then my post is merely a reminder.

 

[Apple Sky]

 

[Yttrium]

View attachment 357196

View attachment 357197

Ah. Very nicely timed with the Moon there.

For no particular reason...

 

[David Lamb]

View attachment 357196

View attachment 357197

I'm not sure what those pictures are supposed to prove. The first one has these words: "At the center of the North Pole is a whirlpool where four rivers breathe in and out every 6 hours. This is the reason for the tides." What's the "centre of the North Pole?" The North Pole is a point - it can't have a centre. As for four rivers and a whirlpool, it's surprising that the arctic explorers who have been to the North Pole don't seem to have noticed them - they'd be frozen anyway. Is this another case where you are going to say, "They are liars," about all those explorers who say they have been to the North Pole but have not seen even one river, let alone four?

 

[Apple Sky]

I'm not sure what those pictures are supposed to prove. The first one has these words: "At the center of the North Pole is a whirlpool where four rivers breathe in and out every 6 hours.

At the center ( the north pole ) there lays a sky high Back magnetic pillar called Rupes Nigra where there is a huge giant whirlpool which draws in the tides, in and out every six hours.
I reckon this could represent the macro for the heart of our bodies.

As for four rivers and a whirlpool, it's surprising that the arctic explorers who have been to the North Pole don't seem to have noticed them

The cartographer Mercator did,
In 1569, Mercator published his epic world map. This map, with its Mercator projection, was designed to help sailors navigate around the earth. They could use latitude and longitude lines to plot a straight route.

But the interesting feature, of course, is Mercator's depiction of the North Pole as a large magnetic rock, surrounded by four mountainous islands which are separated by four major rivers converging upon it.

Don't forget this thread is about the micro & the macro of the earth and our bodies.

 

[David Lamb]

At the center ( the north pole ) there lays a sky high Back magnetic pillar called Rupes Nigra where there is a huge giant whirlpool which draws in the tides, in and out every six hours.
I reckon this could represent the macro for the heart of our bodies.



The cartographer Mercator did,
In 1569, Mercator published his epic world map. This map, with its Mercator projection, was designed to help sailors navigate around the earth. They could use latitude and longitude lines to plot a straight route.

View attachment 357807

But the interesting feature, of course, is Mercator's depiction of the North Pole as a large magnetic rock, surrounded by four mountainous islands which are separated by four major rivers converging upon it.

Don't forget this thread is about the micro & the macro of the earth and our bodies.

I don't think the North Pole can be considered a macro for the human body. You say Mercator noticed the 4 rivers and the whirlpool, but that's strange, because he lived from 1512 to 1594, hundreds of years before anyone visited the North Pole:


"Roald Amundsen and Lincoln Ellsworth are considered the first people to reach the North Pole, having flown over it in the airship Norge on May 12, 1926."

 

[Apple Sky]

You say Mercator noticed the 4 rivers and the whirlpool, but that's strange, because he lived from 1512 to 1594, hundreds of years before anyone visited the North Pole:

Yes, he was an explorer, he even wrote to John Dee about it.

Google Search

 

[David Lamb]

Yes, he was an explorer, he even wrote to John Dee about it.

Google Search

But he didn't visit the North Pole - nobody did before the 20th century. I followed your link - it led to the results of a Google search. I did manage to find the letter, which was very long, but as far as I can see, in it Mercator didn't claim to have visited the North Pole. If you have read the letter, and found such a claim, perhaps you could quote it.

 

[Apple Sky]

But he didn't visit the North Pole - nobody did before the 20th century. I followed your link - it led to the results of a Google search. I did manage to find the letter, which was very long, but as far as I can see, in it Mercator didn't claim to have visited the North Pole. If you have read the letter, and found such a claim, perhaps you could quote it.

Later when I have time.

 

[Apple Sky]

But he didn't visit the North Pole - nobody did before the 20th century. I followed your link - it led to the results of a Google search. I did manage to find the letter, which was very long, but as far as I can see, in it Mercator didn't claim to have visited the North Pole. If you have read the letter, and found such a claim, perhaps you could quote it.

He must have done to map it so accurately & to have wrote a letter to John Dee.