- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,258
- 52,668
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Oh, sorry! My bad!I’m sorry, even though you may think I was replying to you because I quoted your post, I was not. Don’t be so naive in the future. Seriously…
As I said, "In general, it's considered better to start a new thread and - if necessary - link to or refer to the old one."How should this thread be handled then?
I'll bet you wouldn't think twice about quoting Charles Darwin, would you?
And his "thread" (The Preservation of Favoured Races) is much older than this one.
That's because we respond to the post, not the person.Well you were quoting them and responding to what they typed.
Shouldn't that be a Zombie Wizard? And it should deal at least one damage when tapped.
Two threads are better than one?How many times has this been explained? Create a new thread with a link to the old thread, fully disclosing it is a link to an old thread.
Adam and Eve did die for their disobedience.I've discussed this point in other forums and am curious about the opinions here.
If we examine the fable of Eden, we discover an interesting observation. God seems to have lied, and the serpent seems to have told the truth. God told Adam and Eve: (Genesis 3:3) But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die . And the serpent responded: (Genesis 3:4) And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die . Well, as the story goes, we know they both ate the fruit, and did not die.
Following along...
Next, who is God talking to in the following: (Genesis 3:22) And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us , to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever ? Who is he addressing as us? Also, was the "tree of life" another alternate (but forbidden to humans) means of eternal life in heaven?
Opinions?
Do you realize that this is exactly how the first sin came into being...questioning God's word>? That's satan's #1 way of leading people astray, "is that really what He meant?" "He didn't say that exactly" "He never said you couldn't..." etc. Anyway, just thought I would point that out
C. The fact that the Bible tends to be much more concerned with our eternal destiny
For those who think Moses authored (not edited) the book of Genesis, the book of Job is considered the oldest book in the Bible.That is a hard sell from an OT perspective. The OT shows very little concern about life after death. The idea hardly appears at all.
For those who think Moses authored (not edited) the book of Genesis, the book of Job is considered the oldest book in the Bible.
Job 19:25 For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth:
Where did he get that information?
Like some of the Psalms, the Book of Job came from Egypt and they sourced the teachings of the Salem missionaries of Melchizedek. Job is parabolic, it's a worldly wise reaction to the belief in providence.For those who think Moses authored (not edited) the book of Genesis, the book of Job is considered the oldest book in the Bible.
Job 19:25 For I know that my redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth:
Where did he get that information?
My point is that the plan of salvation begins in Genesis.Where did the author of Ecclesiastes get his information?
Assuming Uz is Egypt, what does that matter?Like some of the Psalms, the Book of Job came from Egypt ...
You do know that Melchizedek was Jesus Christ, do you not?Colter said:... and they sourced the teachings of the Salem missionaries of Melchizedek.
The Hebrews apropriated things from other cultures and made them their own.Assuming Uz is Egypt, what does that matter?You do know that Melchizedek was Jesus Christ, do you not?
Your boys from Chicago wrote that, did they?No, actually Macaventia Melchizedek was an incarnate Son of God under the authority of Christ Michael. Appearing as a full grown man he established a monotheistic evangelist center in Salem from which missionaries went out to the world. He was on the earth for 90 years on an emergency basis. He is of an order of emergency sons. It was Melchizedek who established the covenant with Abram.
You do know that Melchizedek was Jesus Christ, do you not?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?