Continuing to investigate the investigators.

[essentialsaltes]

but this is nowhere near the first time you have heard me say individuals from all parties concerned are involved.

Right, but you seem to be consistent in saying that Trump is the good guy. Are the GOP senators the bad guys? Are Trump's appointees throughout DOJ and the intelligence community the bad guys?

 

[LostMarbels]

Right, but you seem to be consistent in saying that Trump is the good guy. Are the GOP senators the bad guys? Are Trump's appointees throughout DOJ and the intelligence community the bad guys?

It really isn't hard to follow. There are individuals that are against Trump, because Trump fully intends on removing them from power. It cannot get any more simplistic. This close to the election, some individuals have chosen to reveal their true intent hoping Trump will be removed from office. I do not even see how this is hard to follow.

Do you believe Trump is Republican? Or is he just running on the republican ticket?

 

[essentialsaltes]

It really isn't hard to follow.

It is when you don't answer a simple question. I gather Haspel is not the bad guy, since Trump could remove her with a memo. And it can't be anyone at CIA, because Haspel could remove them with a memo. So I guess it must be the Republican senators. Let's help vote them out! Because I think Trump removing them would be unconstitutional.

 

[LostMarbels]

Sometimes things have to be allowed to play out. Again, not a hard concept. If you intend to catch someone who is in a drug ring for example, you do not put them to an immediate end... you get warrants to surveil their illegalities and even document them. Haspel, worked for Brennan. Sometimes you have to let people do what they are going to do in order to not only out them, but to prove the intent that goes along with the motive.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Sometimes things have to be allowed to play out. Again, not a hard concept. If you intend to catch someone who is in a drug ring for example, you do not put them to an immediate end... you get warrants to surveil their illegalities and even document them. Haspel, worked for Brennan. Sometimes you have to let people do what they are going to do in order to not only out them, but to prove the intent that goes along with the motive.

OK, so Trump gave her a job at CIA so that she would commit a crime that he would catch? Wouldn't it be safer to not put future criminals in leadership positions in our intel orgs?

 

[LostMarbels]

OK, so Trump gave her a job at CIA so that she would commit a crime that he would catch? Wouldn't it be safer to not put future criminals in leadership positions in our intel orgs?

How are you supposed to prove it? How do you intend Trump to prove the accusations he has made if you do not provide the accused with the opportunity? Haspel was given a job to do. She didn't have to conspire against the president. She chose sides... picked loyalties. Did you understand FISA doesn't just work one way? The Trump admin can get warrants... conduct investigations.... and the FBI is not the only law enforcement agency with the authority to do so.

 

[essentialsaltes]

How do you intend Trump to prove the accusations he has made

What accusations has he made?

 

[LostMarbels]

What accusations has he made?

Look, I'm done... have fun with whatever it is you want to believe....