The human mind radiates conscious energy that generates the electrical impulses in the human brain to produce human awareness so that we become conscious of our human experiences.
Human mind --> Conscious energy --> Brain activity --> Human awareness --> Conscious experiences.
In that order.
Consciousness alters or stops when the brain that transmits it alter or stop.
Consciousness takes on the form of potential energy when it stops.
That same evidence is also consistent with the brain being the transmitter of consciousness, and not necessarily the creator of consciousness.
You can, of course, believe whatever you like, but none of that makes any scientific sense. It's something made up to sound sciency but with no scientific content, i.e. pseudoscience. There is no scientific evidence consistent with the brain being the 'transmitter of consciousness'; the brain radiates heat and weak electromagnetic waves, but doesn't transmit anything (except in the sense of using the body to communicate with others via language & movement).
I’m sure you are aware that scientists have no idea of how a physical brain can create consciousness.
It’s called “
The Hard Problem”.
Chalmer's 'Hard Problem' is more a philosophical problem than a scientific one - it deals with the explanatory gap between a sequence of physical states and subjective experience. On the scientific side, we've made good progress with discovering the functional components of consciousness and where in the brain they variously originate (for example, see '
Self Comes to Mind' by Antonio Damasio). Personally, I think the explanatory gap is the fundamental irreconcilability of the subjective and the objective; I don't expect it to be closed anytime soon.
Yes, it’s called the human mind.
You misunderstood the question; if the human mind is somehow independent of the brain, there should be some observable aspect of it that is not affected by changes to the brain (that's the point of the TV analogy - the broadcast is independent of the function of the TV, so there are aspects of what the TV displays that cannot be affected by messing with the TV).
For example, a sense of self, or a sense of location, or emotion, are considered common aspects or features of the mind/consciousness. They can all be affected by messing with the brain, which suggests they're features of brain activity, not aspects of something independent of the brain.
I was asking if you could name any identifiable feature of the mind or consciousness that is not affected by changes to the brain.
The human mind is much more than just a physical brain. The human brain is just the physical mechanism through which information is transmitted from the human mind to our human awareness so that we become conscious of our human experiences.
You are simply relying on the correlation between our brain activity and our conscious experiences.
But this correlation would also exists if the brain was the transmitter of consciousness, and not the creator of it.
Well, as a believer in a conscious God who does not have a physical brain, I’m pretty sure that the existence of consciousness is not dependent upon a physical brain.
You may find that a helpful way to think about the mind and consciousness in abstract terms, but it has no scientific basis. Your description just can't work in a universe like ours; it implies that not just neuroscience, but the standard model of physics is completely wrong - and we have exhaustive empirical evidence that isn't the case at human scales & energies.
Making up sciency sounding stuff in an attempt to support a supernatural belief is pseudoscience.