Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Been there, done that. That's why we teach evolution in schools and not ID.
If the ToE was false we wouldn't have the medicine we have today. ID doesn't get us anything, it's completely useless.
Uh, no. Tomkins' comparisons of human and chimp genomic sequences was based on an incorrect methodology. That's it.
Usually when the term information is used with respect to life forms it refers to DNA content/sequences. For which the mechanisms described in the prior linked site explain how DNA can be duplicated and modified.
What exactly is evolutionary geology? Rocks don’t evolve.
First of all chimps don’t change into humans or visa versa . We share a common ancestor and all that took was for 2 populations of a species to diverge . Since creationists have this weird non scientific definition of information I’m not sure what you mean.
Junk DNA is a sort of inaccurate name for non coding DNA. We USED to think that it has no use but we’ve corrected that so long ago that your point in even bringing it up is silly.
Haeckels embryos ? The pharyngula stage in vertebrate development is obvious if you look at photos of it in different organisms.
Again that is some creationist taking an overstatement by a long dead researcher and making a tempest in a teapot out of it.
Any polyploid species is evidence of macroevolution. Don’t know why creationists keep lying about macroevolution
That is not evidence of anything, except maybe a common designer.
Very well. Explain macroevolution of a chimp to a human, or vice versa, based on the DNA content/sequences.
Since you provide no references, are you referring to this from 2012?
There are about 25 protohuman species . Here’s one that they think is one of the ancestors of both the other great apes and humans View attachment 230316
Is that really true?
Just so there is no misunderstanding, to a good approximation nothing Jeffrey Tomkins writes about genetics is at all accurate.Just so there is no misunderstanding by new-arrivals, humans and chimps are only about 70% similar. There are many millions of differences, as Dr. Jeffrey Tomkins, (PhD Genetics, Clemson U.) explains:
No, they've repeatedly lied, made elementary mistakes and obfuscated as much as possible.Baloney. Creation and ID scientists have exposed serious flaws in the evolutionary model,
Yup, Venema did indeed overestimate the time period during which we can rule out a unique starting couple for the human race. Turns out we can only rule it out for the last 700,000 years, not 7 million years. That's still long before the appearance of anatomically modern humans, and far longer than anything someone like Tomkins is talking about. And of course genetics provides no reason at all to think there was a first couple So why are you viewing this as support for creationism, or in any way undermining of evolution. (Note, by the way, that I'm one of the geneticists mentioned in this article.)Venema himself has been exposed as one who is more than willing to stretch the truth a bit:
https://evolutionnews.org/2018/05/d...the-genome-former-biologos-fellow-backs-down/
Perhaps Venema is more concerned with his dogma being exposed if creation scientists are allowed into the peer-review process.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?