My interest is not in evolution. I am interested in the Haggadah and the Talmud, Tanuak, and the Brit Ha' Dashai
Tanakh? I've never seen it spelled with a "U". Why are you on an evolution thread then?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
My interest is not in evolution. I am interested in the Haggadah and the Talmud, Tanuak, and the Brit Ha' Dashai
Why is an atheist on a Christian Forum ?
Neither of us have very good odds.
If there must be a creator god, you cannot dismiss Allah, Mbombo, Atum, Ptah, Unkulunkulu, Nanabozho, Brahma, Coatilique, Viracocha, Esenge Malan, Kamuy, Izanagi and Izanami, Marduk Vishvakarman, The sons of Borr, Rod or Ranginui and Papatuanuku.
El/Yahweh is not the only contender, so if any of these gods have a hell then your a dead cert to be there as well.
So I guess we're both playing roulette then.

I find it hard to believe, in a world where survival of the fittest is easy to see, that in-between species could survive...much less thrive.
And that is in the case of all the transitions you've listed.
Maybe the reason these links are missing is because they never existed in the first place.
![]()
A species of Genus A, daisy-chained* to a species of Genus B.You didn't answer my question. What particular lineage of transitional fossils would you like me to provide for you?
A species of Genus A, daisy-chained* to a species of Genus B.
* No missing links.
What kind of question is that?And how many fossils do you require to consider something "daisy-chained"?
Oh, please.If I give you 5, will you ask for 10? 100?
It appears you don't understand what I mean by asking you to daisy-chain your fossils.I also must point out that your questions is fundamentally flawed...
I totally disagree with this -- (but I don't understand neoevolution like it is taught today, either).... as species in one genus do not evolve into species of another genus, rather, they share a common ancestor.
I bet you would if your bible allowed it.Nice drawing, by the way, but I'm not going to connect dots that I don't think ever existed.
I totally disagree with this -- (but I don't understand neoevolution like it is taught today, either).
So it came by abiogenesis?You can disagree with it all you like but in no version of evolution has a species in one genus ever evolved into a species in another genus.
So it came by abiogenesis?
Why is an atheist on a Christian Forum ?
I was discussing ELOHIM CREATOR of the Universe, you were linking to your teachers of evolution which is your religion.
Evolution is Not a Religion.Like all evolutionists you leave out half of what is said. If you can not dazzle with brilliance, baffle with bull crap.They're Allowed.Why is an atheist on a Christian Forum ?
I don't know if you mean too, but you're coming across like a d-bag.Like all evolutionists you leave out half of what is said. If you can not dazzle with brilliance, baffle with bull crap.
Like all evolutionists you leave out half of what is said. If you can not dazzle with brilliance, baffle with bull crap.