- Oct 2, 2020
- 28,117
- 15,246
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Who needs Biblical exegesis when you have cute cartoons and humor, right?
Who needs Biblical exegesis when you have cute cartoons and humor, right?
What is it about universal redemption that annoys so many Christians? Shouldn’t we be happy that God’s love and mercy are wider, higher, deeper, and broader than we could ever imagine? We all sin at times so shouldn't we welcome the thought that God is not going to annihilate or eternally torment us if we don't “accept,” “trust,” “repent,” “believe,” well enough to appropriate the grace of God?
You would think so but it seems from the recent threads on Christian Universalism that this is not the case. Why is this?
Here are some of the reasons that have been expressed in the threads:
1. ”If everyone is or will be saved, what’s the point in following Jesus?”
To me, anyone who thinks this must see following Jesus as a heavy burden, one that needs the reward of heaven to make it worth the hassle. But shouldn't following Jesus and having a good relationship with him here and now be its own reward?
It's also a misunderstanding of Christian Universalism to think it says that we don't have to receive the saving grace of Christ in order to be reconciled to God and to each other. It just says that if we don't manage to do this in this life there will be boundless opportunities to do so in the next one and that eventually every one will accept forgiveness and repent of their sins... ”that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those in heaven, and of those on earth, and of those under the earth" (Phil 2:10)
2. "All my hard work at being a Christian has been undermined".
This is very much like 1. Shouldn't any work we do be done out of love for God, not for any personal eternal rewards?
3. ”If there is an 'us,' there has to be a 'them'"
This may be true about some things such as football: I support Manchester United so I hate Manchester City (I'm from the UK, apologies) but it needn't apply to matters of faith. If we are going to heaven when we die there doesn't have to be a group who go to hell.
These three reasons seem to have something in common and that's judgementalism. They're all essentially saying "Look, I'm a good Christian and my hard work and sacrifices has earned me membership into the very exclusive club of heaven and, sad to say it, but most other people haven't done anywhere nearly as enough as me and so, unfortunately, missed out on the opportunity." This makes you think of the work vs. faith debate ironically but, moving swiftly on from that, isn't it true that being judgemental is wrong and if that's the main reason behind our objection to Christian Universalism, shouldn't we consider that we might be misunderstanding it?
There are biblical arguments that can be made for and against Christian Universalism but there are plenty of existing threads discussing that so, assuming anyone wants to respond!, I'd be more interested in hearing what your gut, visceral reaction is, whether for or against, when you hear the words "Christian Universalism". For me, it's basically relief that God is a loving God and not a monster after all.
You have seen good exegesis. You refuse to accept it choosing instead to believe anything, everything that some UR believing "scholar" says, without question.This implies that we have seen good exegesis from Team Hell but all we've had so far are the "original" and non-expert theories you have spoken about. Humour and cartoons aren't a bad way to fill in the gaps.
Not every one will be saved since those under the earth in hell are not. They will bow anyway because Jesus is Lord.
The bio chip to buy & sell is already at work in Europe but it is not the mark of the beast yet because it is not the only means to buy & sell with. When it is the only way to buy & sell for every one in the coming New World Order, then that is the mark of the beast. If it was not a big deal, then there be no warning of the consequences, but there is and so Christian Universalism falls flat.
Doesn't society have prisons and death penalties? What for? To keep society safe.
That is the reality of the life we live in. If you seek a safe home for your family by not having a hardened criminal release into your home, then why should you expect God to be any different?
Where does scripture tell us that at some point al evil, unrighteous people "repent and gladly confess that Jesus is Lord?" I read where there will wailing and gnashing of teeth but no confessing.* * * You're right, I wouldn't want to see Hitler types in heaven unless they have repented and gladly confessed that Jesus is Lord because that would be disrespectful to all their victims. But, luckily, as we have seen, scripture tells us that one day they will. This obviously doesn't always happen in this life, so for some.it must happen in "hell".
Yes, but a life-sentence is not the only sentence available to the courts. Sentences are proportionate and ideally rehabilitative as well as punitive so that the prisoner can readjust back into society upon release. This is not the case with the one-size-fits-all approach of ECT where Hitler and Gandhi are given the same sentence and, worse, a sentence in which there is no rehabilitation and no end and therefore no purpose other than torment for torments sake.
Yes, every knee in heaven, on earth and under the earth shall bow and every tongue shall confess that Jesus Christ is Lord. But this means that everyone is saved because no-one can say that Jesus is Lord except by the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 12:3)
Where does Scripture mention bio chips? This sounds more like QAnon to me.
Yes, but a life-sentence is not the only sentence available to the courts. Sentences are proportionate and ideally rehabilitative as well as punitive so that the prisoner can readjust back into society upon release. This is not the case with the one-size-fits-all approach of ECT where Hitler and Gandhi are given the same sentence and, worse, a sentence in which there is no rehabilitation and no end and therefore no purpose other than torment for torments sake.
You're right, I wouldn't want to see Hitler types in heaven unless they have repented and gladly confessed that Jesus is Lord because that would be disrespectful to all their victims. But, luckily, as we have seen, scripture tells us that one day they will. This obviously doesn't always happen in this life, so for some.it must happen in "hell".
You have seen good exegesis. You refuse to accept it choosing instead to believe anything, everything that some UR believing "scholar" says, without question.
Not realizing that simply posting an opposing translation does not disprove what you reject.
I have posted a study of every occurrence of "aionios" in the N.T. showing how Jesus, Paul and other NT writers describe/define "aionios" which has not been reasonably addressed. And certainly not refuted.
I have quoted from the Eastern Orthodox Bible. Crickets.
The mark of the beast will be the bio chip soon to be revealed in the coming new world order after the rapture event for when a third of the earth will get burned up ( the entire western hemisphere ) for why resources will be pooled for survival and the world has to take the mark in order to buy & sell to survive.
The bio chip is one of umpteen theories. Remember, it was going to be a UPC code back when those came out.
Anyone can make the Bible say almost anything they want it to by quoting selective verses out-of-context as you have done here.I noticed, while reading the Law that God gave to Moses, that punishments were proportionate, and that the worst sentence for any sin/crime was simple death. Never was a punishment after death mentioned or hinted at. Many, many years later, Paul wrote, "For he that is dead is freed from sin." Romans 6:7, KJV
If you wish to contend that no one goes to hell or the lake of fire, then why are they there as beneath the earth?
Them taking the knee as beneath the earth is them accepting His judgment of eternal torment.
The mark of the beast will be the bio chip soon to be revealed in the coming new world order after the rapture event for when a third of the earth will get burned up ( the entire western hemisphere ) for why resources will be pooled for survival and the world has to take the mark in order to buy & sell to survive
Anyone can make the Bible say almost anything they want it to by quoting selective verses out-of-context as you have done here.
Paul also wrote,
1 Corinthians 6:9-10Twenty two groups of people, no inheritance. No ifs, and, buts, or maybes or saved by death. Do you suppose that Paul forgot what he said in Romans when he wrote 1 Cor 6:9-10, Ga 5:19-21, Eph 5:5 and 1 Cor 3:17 or vice versa.
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: [no wrongdoer] neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
Galatians 5:19-21
19 Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness,
20 Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies,
21 Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
Ephesian 5:5 For this ye know, that [no wrongdoer] no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.
1 Corinthians 3:17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.
Romans 11:21-23Note the Jews were cut off but can be grafted back in only if they they do not remain in unbelief. And the gentiles who were grafted in can only remain if they continue in the goodness of God.
21 For if God spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee.
22 Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God: on them which fell, severity; but toward thee, goodness, if thou continue in his goodness: otherwise thou also shalt be cut off.
23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again.
But I don't contend that. I'm saying that the fire is a purifying rather than a purely punitive one. It's not identical to a real fire that we experience on earth..Look at Moses and the burning bush. The bust wasn't destroyed was it? So, it wasn't a real fire but represents something about God, His purity and how we can't approach it while we are impure.
But don't forget the second part of the verse which says that we ("they" if you want but it may include you. Funny how we always assume it won't) all will confess that Jesus is Lord and this can only be done by the grace of the Holy Spirit. All shall confess by the Holy Spirit and so all will be saved. What's not to like?
Again, that's QAnon, not scripture.
And Henry Kissinger was going to be the AntiChrist...
Anyone can make the Bible say almost anything they want it to by quoting selective verses out-of-context as you have done here.
Is that a fact. Was the punishment that God administered to the all the people of the earth at the time of Noah, proprotionate. There there are all the people killed in Sodom, Gomorrah and the cities of the plains and let us not forget all the people in the cities of Canaan. In all three cases everyone young, old, men, women, children, infants were killed. Was that all proportionate?I noticed, while reading the Law that God gave to Moses, that punishments were proportionate, and that the worst sentence for any sin/crime was simple death. Never was a punishment after death mentioned or hinted at. Many, many years later, Paul wrote, "For he that is dead is freed from sin." Romans 6:7, KJV