• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Christian and Evolution

alexamasan

Newbie
Oct 18, 2009
66
0
United States of America
✟22,676.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I don't understand how some people can say they are Christian and also believe in evolution. The bible clearly states that God created Man from the ground and Woman from his ribs. Evolution supports that man evolved from a more primitive primate.

I just can't understand how people can be so inconsistent with their religion and atheist often look at these people as representatives of the religion and judge their religion as so. I consider these kinds of Christians the Lukewarm type of person mentioned in Revelation when they were talking about the people of Laodicea.
 

alexamasan

Newbie
Oct 18, 2009
66
0
United States of America
✟22,676.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
@xDenax

Too bad only Christians are allowed to reply to my post.

I go to bible studies and learn about why each book was written and understand what each verse means in the context that it was written. So in that context, you should take the bible pretty literally. If you don't, you are just making things up. The bible clearly states in genesis that God created man, and genesis is written as an account of what really happened. If you are a Christian and you don't accept what the bible says, then you are a terrible Christian.

And also, I am a Biology major, and I've been learning all about evolution ever since my freshman year, and I can tell you that the Bible and Evolution are inconsistent. There is absolutely no way you can believe in both. I did not just spend 5 minutes thinking on this.

Now, if you believe that you have a way to somehow mingle the two ideas together, I would like to hear that, though you should pm me and not reply here as your post may get deleted.

====

Yeah... well... the Bible says a lot of things.

what is that suppose to mean?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟52,334.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
If you are a Christian and you don't accept what the bible says, then you are a terrible Christian.

I consider these kinds of Christians the Lukewarm type of person mentioned in Revelation when they were talking about the people of Laodicea.

Once you get finished with the book of Genesis and revelations there is alittle bit written in Matthew about pulling the plank from your eye before you worry about the spec in your brothers eye..
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
I don't understand how some people can say they are Christian and also believe in evolution. The bible clearly states that God created Man from the ground and Woman from his ribs. Evolution supports that man evolved from a more primitive primate.
Not everything in any text should be read woodenly literally.


I go to bible studies and learn about why each book was written and understand what each verse means in the context that it was written. So in that context, you should take the bible pretty literally.
Says who? You want to read it that way - be my guest.



If you don't, you are just making things up.
That is simply false.

The bible clearly states in genesis that God created man, and genesis is written as an account of what really happened.
Says who?

If you are a Christian and you don't accept what the bible says, then you are a terrible Christian.
I do believe what Scripture says, I just do not agree with what you think it means.
 
Upvote 0

Adoniram

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2004
932
110
72
Missouri
✟24,287.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Now, you see, that just seems a little strange to me. I assure you that I have put considerably more than "five minutes worth of thought into" the subject. For the most part, the Bible was written by simple men, most of them uneducated, who wrote in simple yet profound terms as they were guided by the Holy Spirit. It doesn't take a genius to understand the Bible's simple message. Certainly though, there is depth in those simple words that a lifetime of study cannot fully unlock.

As a Christian, I don't want to, neither do I need to "reconcile" or compromise my belief in the Bible and it's simple explanation of our origins. This world's science does not offer a "better" explanation, or one that is more right; it's merely different. I have done the research, and I have read the books, and what I've found is that the disciplines supporting the current ToE (I say current because, although generally it holds to the basic common descent concept, it's specifics change almost daily) make far too many assumptions for it to be taken seriously. It's really surprising, considering that they call it "science," that these assumptions are allowed to be maintained.

Quite frankly, even if I were not a Christian believing in the Bible, I would have a hard time accepting the ToE as fact.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Coralie

but behold, there cometh one after me
Sep 29, 2009
1,220
213
✟24,857.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
I don't understand how some people can say they are Christian and also believe in evolution. The bible clearly states that God created Man from the ground and Woman from his ribs. Evolution supports that man evolved from a more primitive primate.

I just can't understand how people can be so inconsistent with their religion and atheist often look at these people as representatives of the religion and judge their religion as so. I consider these kinds of Christians the Lukewarm type of person mentioned in Revelation when they were talking about the people of Laodicea.

What's the question?

...if you're asking how a Christian can profess faith and accept that evolution probably occurred, that's pretty simple. The Bible is not to be taken literally, word for word. The Genesis story is an allegory of how human beings first became conscious, and rejected God for the first time.

Don't assume that because some Xians believe that the Bible is 100% literal (so when Jesus said "I am the gate" in John 10:9, he meant he was an actual gate, for example), that you're a "bad Xian" if you don't believe the same thing.

...also... are you seriously calling non-Creationist Xians "lukewarm" for not believing what you think "good Xians" are "supposed" to believe? How do Buddhists define a "good Xian"? Or even a "consistent" one?
 
Upvote 0

Supreme

British
Jul 30, 2009
11,891
490
London
✟30,185.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
The Greeks wrote plays, stories and theories that are still in common use amongst classical studies today. In those stories, the Greeks included philosophy, comedy, relationships and science. So I still think ancient mythology and the like has some place in our society.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Willtor

Not just any Willtor... The Mighty Willtor
Apr 23, 2005
9,713
1,429
44
Cambridge
Visit site
✟39,787.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I don't understand how some people can say they are Christian and also believe in evolution. The bible clearly states that God created Man from the ground and Woman from his ribs. Evolution supports that man evolved from a more primitive primate.

I just can't understand how people can be so inconsistent with their religion and atheist often look at these people as representatives of the religion and judge their religion as so. I consider these kinds of Christians the Lukewarm type of person mentioned in Revelation when they were talking about the people of Laodicea.

I call shenanigans. This does not strike me as the sort of thing a Buddhist would post. I may be wrong. But this post strikes me as too pointed. Are you actually a creationist posting from a sock account?
 
Upvote 0

Adoniram

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2004
932
110
72
Missouri
✟24,287.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Some people believe that because a Christian rejects the ToE that they reject all science. That is not the case and simply shows how narrow-minded some people can be. And some people mistake oral tradition for mythology. Strange that they can't recognize the difference even now in an age when the knowledge they receive through education is more advanced than at any time in history.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
Gentle reminder: only the Original Poster and Christians should be posting in this thread, and Christians should confine themselves to responding to the original poster.

People want a discussion on the pros and cons of evolutionary theory they must take that to an appropriate forum.
 
Upvote 0

Adoniram

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2004
932
110
72
Missouri
✟24,287.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Wow! So you really think that we reject the physics that makes a light bulb work. And that we reject the chemical and medical discoveries that allow scientists to make antibiotics that fight infection in our bodies. And that we reject the mathematics that are required for the production of this computer or putting a man in space. Amazing. The fact is that we recognize and applaud the sciences that make possible the multitude of things that we use everyday. But in recognizing good scientific work, one must also recognize bad scientific work, and ToE falls into the latter category. To base a whole scientific endeavor on unfounded assumptions is simply bad science.

I have to admit to a common misunderstanding which I fell into. According to the strict definition of mythology, and/or folklore, the Bible does indeed fall into that category...being stories of ancient times. However, and this is where I went astray, it is commonly assumed that myth equals falsehood, and as I found out, such is not necessarily the case.

From Wikipedia sources- "The term "myth" is often used colloquially to refer to a false story; however, the academic use of the term generally does not refer to truth or falsity....As sacred stories, myths are often endorsed by rulers and priests and closely linked to religion. In the society in which it is told, a myth is usually regarded as a true account of the remote past. In fact, many societies have two categories of traditional narrative—(1) "true stories", or myths, and (2) "false stories", or fables."

My mistake was in rejecting the use of the term "myth" because I too was under the impression that a "myth" was a false story with no basis in fact. I know now that is not the case. The Bible may be a collection of ancient stories, but that doesn't mean they are false. Many of them have been confirmed by independent sources.

2 Peter 1
16 For we did not follow cunningly devised fables when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of His majesty.

But I must assume that in your use of the word "myth," you did intend to convey the idea that the Bible is a collection of fables. For you...

2 Peter 3
1This second epistle, beloved, I now write unto you; in both which I stir up your pure minds by way of remembrance:
2That ye may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Saviour:
3Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
4And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
5For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
6Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
7But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
I don't understand how some people can say they are Christian and also believe in evolution.

Even if evolution could be proven as true, it wouldn't contradict God being the Creator of everything. For God could have simply created evolution (random mutation and survival of the fittest) as a natural mechanism by which new species would arise as part of his Creation.

And the existence of evolution would in no way forbid God to go outside of it whenever he wanted to and miraculously create from scratch new species (or new, individual members of already-existing species, whether those species had previously come into existence via natural evolution or via miracle), like when he miraculously created the individual man Adam from scratch, from the dust of the ground (Genesis 2:7), instead of evolving Adam from some pre-existing hominid.
 
Upvote 0
F

freeport

Guest
I don't understand how some people can say they are Christian and also believe in evolution. The bible clearly states that God created Man from the ground and Woman from his ribs. Evolution supports that man evolved from a more primitive primate.

I just can't understand how people can be so inconsistent with their religion and atheist often look at these people as representatives of the religion and judge their religion as so. I consider these kinds of Christians the Lukewarm type of person mentioned in Revelation when they were talking about the people of Laodicea.

I don't really judge much Christian evolutionists. There is evolution, just not inter-species evolution. Important distinction.

I don't believe it myself because there is no evidence for it and it is silly... in light of the fact that the Heavens and earth are created to wrap around our senses.

People want to be base animals, so they find themselves in control of gods, children of God.

That is the height of insanity, absurdity, ignorance, and foolishness... and they do not have any understanding of this.

They would rather be base beasts.

If we laugh at this, they have no cognizance of it.

I hate to sound cruel, but it is true. All... too... true...
 
Upvote 0

Jesusfreak93

Regular Member
Nov 4, 2009
127
10
31
Newberry, SC
✟22,798.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Check out these links, I believe they are self explanatory:
10 Dangers of Theistic Evolution - ChristianAnswers.Net
Apologetics Press - What's Wrong with Theistic Evolution?
Biblical Evidence Against Theistic Evolution - Top Ten Proofs (especially look at this one)

Theistic evolution is wrong, just as progressive creation is wrong.
God programmed each person with a knowledge of the language when He created them, so when He told man He created the world in a week, we knew exactly what He was talking about, in the same token, He could have told us that He created Adam from the animals quite clearly and understandably, but He didn't. He could have used evolution if He wanted to, but He did not.
 
Upvote 0

Willtor

Not just any Willtor... The Mighty Willtor
Apr 23, 2005
9,713
1,429
44
Cambridge
Visit site
✟39,787.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

I'm afraid these links have bogus information -- both about evolution and about theistic evolutionists. I don't know whether the authors are being dishonest or whether they are honestly misinformed, but I would not use these links as part of an argument.

Theistic evolution is wrong, just as progressive creation is wrong.
God programmed each person with a knowledge of the language when He created them, so when He told man He created the world in a week, we knew exactly what He was talking about, in the same token, He could have told us that He created Adam from the animals quite clearly and understandably, but He didn't. He could have used evolution if He wanted to, but He did not.

Actually, it seems like He _did_ use evolution to make us. And I don't think the interpretation of Genesis is as simple as modern creationist leaders would have you believe. Actually, it has been an ongoing discussion and debate among religious scholars since before Christ.
 
Upvote 0