Choosing a side?

[Mallon]

Par for the course, eh, gluadys?

 

[gluadys]

This was just given.

No, it wasn't.

Read it again.

Do you think the text will change?

This was in the links provided.

No it wasn't.

Conclusion: Claims of a hoax are unverifiable conjectures. And the legitimacy is maintained. Just another fossil find.

You can't have legitimate claims about a skull whose very existence has not been established. The skull that has been examined and dated is recent.

Par for the course, eh, gluadys?

You said it.