• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Chik-Fil-A and tolerance

stamperben

It's an old family tradition
Oct 16, 2011
14,551
4,079
✟61,194.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Wasn't prop 8 determined by a vote of the people rather than an edict from a single elected official? Rights can be granted/recinded through law correct?
Part of the problem with Calif. The initiative passed has to be Constitutional. Prop 8 wasn't. Same for a city's mayor's initiative. If it is allowed by the law of the land all well and good, if you don't like it vote the bum out.

For those of you with law degrees, file suit against those mayors who wish a business out of their city. Let the law decide. What's the problem with that?
 
Upvote 0

MachZer0

Caught Between Barack and a Hard Place
Mar 9, 2005
61,058
2,302
✟94,109.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
In Boston and Chicago over Chic-Fil-A, perhaps. But in California over Prop 8....

Exactly! And it cuts both ways.
There is no violation of rights in this case other than the attempts by mayors to ban Chick fil-A from their cities, and now a New York city councilman calling for them to be banned from campus
 
Upvote 0

OllieFranz

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2007
5,328
351
✟31,048.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Wasn't prop 8 determined by a vote of the people rather than an edict from a single elected official? Rights can be granted/recinded through law correct?

the Declaration of Independence said:
We hold these vruths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, ....
(emphasis mine)

The US Constitution recognizes certain of these unalienable rights, and the guardians of the Constitution (aka the Supreme Court) have added to the list rights that are not specifically spelled out in the text, but are alluded to in Amendments Nine and Ten. No legislation can repeal the government's recognition of these rights. It would take a Constitutional amendment to repeal their recognition.

So, no. Rights can not be granted/rescinded by law. They are unalienable. The government can recognize a right or try to ignore it, by passing laws, but once a right is recognized by the Constitution or by the Supreme Court, it takes the a change in the Constitution or the Supreme Court to rescind that recognition.
 
Upvote 0

Tomas de Torquemada

Active Member
Jul 3, 2012
383
10
✟600.00
Faith
Catholic
Anyone still in denial about the culture war, this is your wake up call.



Anyone else remember WAAAY back in the ancient days of 2004, when all the leftist pundits were claiming gay marriage was a red herring throw up by the right in order to distract the population from the real issues? That they were freaking out over "slippery slopes" and that the left had no intention of defiling marriage?


I guess 2004 is a bit too far back for the left to remember.
 
Upvote 0

OllieFranz

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2007
5,328
351
✟31,048.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Anyone still in denial about the culture war, this is your wake up call.



Anyone else remember WAAAY back in the ancient days of 2004, when all the leftist pundits were claiming gay marriage was a red herring throw up by the right in order to distract the population from the real issues? That they were freaking out over "slippery slopes" and that the left had no intention of defiling marriage?


I guess 2004 is a bit too far back for the left to remember.

What "the pundits" said then is still true today. How has Adam and Steve's marriage in Massachusetts defiled your marriage? Or how does recognizing the basic right of John and Joe to marriage and its rights and obligations defile the same right to Jim and Mary? Please be specific. Generic fear mongering does not advance anyone's understanding of the issue.
 
Upvote 0

MachZer0

Caught Between Barack and a Hard Place
Mar 9, 2005
61,058
2,302
✟94,109.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Is Chik-Fil-A now going to require that each customer swear to a "sexual orientation" oath before being served?
A better question is are mayors going to require every business to swear to a pro same sex marriage policy before giving business permits?
 
Upvote 0

MachZer0

Caught Between Barack and a Hard Place
Mar 9, 2005
61,058
2,302
✟94,109.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Here's a question. LGBTQRSXYZ groups are going to do a "kiss in" to protest, right? Can't Chick-fil-a just demand they order something or leave? And if they do, aren't they just helping their business?
I would say it will depend on where this protest is held. Inside the story they can be removed and possibly arrested. Outside the store, they can still be asked to leave and possibly arrested if on private property. On the public sidewalk, they can pretty much do as they please within the confines of the law.
 
Upvote 0

psalms 91

Legend
Dec 27, 2004
71,903
13,538
✟134,786.00
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
What "the pundits" said then is still true today. How has Adam and Steve's marriage in Massachusetts defiled your marriage? Or how does recognizing the basic right of John and Joe to marriage and its rights and obligations defile the same right to Jim and Mary? Please be specific. Generic fear mongering does not advance anyone's understanding of the issue.
What it does do is legalize sin which to me and many many others as witnessed by the mass support has no place in our society(legally I mean)
 
Upvote 0

Lee52

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2011
1,951
79
Normal, Illinois
✟2,645.00
Faith
Wesleyan
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Perhaps this is the one issue that can unite Christians and Islam in peace?

I doubt it, but who knows?

By the most recent demographics, conducted in a study by a liberal University of California campus, GLBT citizens in the USA make up smaller than 4% of the total population.

The two largest groups that do not support that <4% of the population's agenda are Muslims and Christians.

Stranger things have happened.
 
Upvote 0