And an insatiable appetites.You're in rare form here....
It's possible that they contracted a rare and dangerous disease from their own product known as "El Pollo Loco". It's known to cause erratic behavior in Christians.
Upvote
0
And an insatiable appetites.You're in rare form here....
It's possible that they contracted a rare and dangerous disease from their own product known as "El Pollo Loco". It's known to cause erratic behavior in Christians.
At it's core, I don't think that "voting with one's dollars" is a completely fruitless strategy...
I see this as a lesson in never catering to progressives because by definition they can never be content with what they have or how things are. Otherwise, they could no longer be "progressive". To compromise with a progressive is like giving a mouse a cookie while it is sliding down the slippery slope. So again I say that if CFA is going to cater to the left, they will not be catering at my events.
I understand.. when your food was once prepared with hate then suddenly no longer prepared with hate.. it's just not the same..
Did CFA actually try to stifle some LBTG groups? Or did they just have some people in charge with unpopular opinions?
I don't know much about the Chick-fil-a situation. Just think some people enjoyed hate eating that chicken, lol.
But in the end boycotting means putting thousands of chickens out of a job to say nothing of putting a dent in the wallets of chicken farmers. And at the end of the day, the LGBTQ folks will still be LGBTQ and still be pursuing their equal rights in a free society.
When a person says "by some folks," he has almost certainly insulated himself against being wrong...technically speaking. There are always going to be "some" exceptions to any observation like yours....to me, that seems like more of a dog-whistle/word-game tactic that gets played by some folks in the evangelical community by promoting policies that directly and negatively impact the gay community, but still wanting to claim "we're not anti-gay".
Did CFA actually try to stifle some LBTG groups? Or did they just have some people in charge with unpopular opinions?
Lol , I'm not into boycotts. But, I wont be going Chik-fil-A for a while. I prefer Chinese and sushi food. And I don't have a Chik-fil-A close to where I live.OK people, I have a Chik-fil-A solution!
1. Christians get to eat there Mon, Weds, Sat.
2. Gays get to eat there Tues, Thurs, Sun
3. Chik-fil-A is closed Friday for the Muslims.
You kinda gave up the high road of reason and justice there in favor of pointing fingers at some scapegoats, didn't you? Thus poisoned, your argument wound up being stillborn.And they should pursue their equal rights in this country. LGBTQ citizens are American citizens. There is absolutely no reason why they should be denied equality and rights just because some disgruntled conservative Christians disapprove of the LGBTQ sexual orientation and lifestyle.
They donated millions to groups that opposed SSM as their primary goal.
"It's weird to see people calling The Salvation Army an "anti-TBGL organization""
Salvation Army is a stranger organization than most suppose. To rise in the ranks, you must be married (but not gay married). Though they serve everyone, and have stopped AFAIK referring gay people to conversion therapy, the organization itself still discriminates against gay people in employment and benefits.
Drivers licenses are not a right. How would you feel if we made a law denying drivers licenses to Lutherans because we disagreed with their lifestyle choices?They do nothing of the sort. Especially the Dred Scott ruling. The 14th Amendment has nothing to do with marriage as marriage is a legal institution not a natural right.
You cannot deny it is conservative Christians that are the biggest group opposed to gay marriage. 60% of politically conservative Christians oppose gay marriage and only 10% that lean liberal politically are against gay marriage. If it was not for Christians gay people would have been able to marry long ago.You kinda gave up the high road of reason and justice there in favor of pointing fingers at some scapegoats, didn't you? Thus poisoned, your argument wound up being stillborn.
As much as we can generalize about a religion, Christianity is responsible for a shocking amount of suffering in this world re being gay in this world - from enforcing outcast status right up to horrific persecution.You cannot deny it is conservative Christians that are the biggest group opposed to gay marriage. 60% of politically conservative Christians oppose gay marriage and only 10% that lean liberal politically are against gay marriage. If it was not for Christians gay people would have been able to marry long ago.
Like?
Right ...it's a Christian organization. It's not a business...it's not part of the government. I get that you might not be happy about it...but they can do those things, right?