I was recently reading an old personality thread and I think that she might have said that she was an INTJ ...
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's interesting. Given that I'm a female T myself, I shouldn't have assumed the F. Statistically speaking though, more women are F's than T's.jan003 said:I was recently reading an old personality thread and I think that she might have said that she was an INTJ ...
ChristianGradStudent said:That's interesting. Given that I'm a female T myself, I shouldn't have assumed the F. Statistically speaking though, more women are F's than T's.
I'm an IXTJ by the way. My S and N are almost 50/50. I'm moderately a T, but I do have an F side (the only people that even catch a glimpse of that side of me are those I have a lot of trust in).
Dating an ESFP type would make me insane.jan003 said:Anyways invisiblebabe are you an INTJ...if so your opposite is an ESFP.
I'm also a social science-oriented T. A lot of people probably think its wierd that I'm going to be an elementary school teacher, but I see being a moderate T as an advantage in a way. I'm able to be very fair/objective a lot easier than many strong F teachers that I know. I just have to work harder at the emotional aspects of it. My F side does come out a little more eaily around kids though.invisiblebabe said:HiThanks for replying! IxTJ huh? Believe I've met one before, but that's all. The 4% stat I posted was combining all IN types, although I think my stats may be slightly off if INFP's alone make up 4% of the population
![]()
INxJ over here. Moderate I, extreme N, borderline T/F (I seem to come across as a T in natural expression and am extremely analytical, but am also quite relational and much more social science oriented than many T's who are hard science oriented), and low to moderate J. Most people think I come off as a T type though, except of course those who are stronger T types![]()
Dating an ESFP type would make me insane.My sister is one and though I love her, she can be very trying at times.
So I think it's safe to say I'll never end up dating or marrying one!! For me, extroversion is a turnoff, and combine that with a sensing type and he'll have nothing whatsoever in common with me even on a friendship level (more than "Hi how are you?").
In this sense I believe opposites do NOT attract. Certainly one person's strengths must complement the other's weaknesses to a degree, and vice versa.... but I think it's best for the two people to be more similar in key areas and have the differences in less fundamental areas. A difference on the T/F spectrum or J/P spectrum wouldn't be a problem for me, as I don't find those areas quite as fundamental in discerning who I relate to on a deeper level.
I've run into men like that too, but only the stronger E's. I've found that the slight E's tend not to turn me into a Pygmalion project. I don't come across guys who are slight E's too often though. It seems like most guys are pretty strongly one way or the other (or at least the ones I've run into are anyway).invisiblebabe said:I haven't met an extroverted guy who is interested in me romantically and can relate to me yet doesn't seem to have a notion that I somehow must be "fixed" or "changed" to become more like him.
From what I read in your profile (i.e. your love of sine waves, etc.), I'd almost be willing to bet money that you're either INTJ or INTP.renaistre said:LOL. No offense, but this almost sounds like a Christian version of asking "what's your sign?"I think I'm an INTJ, but I don't remember for sure.
Nico said:i think when you start dissecting the probability of finding someone who's right (which i do all the time) you get blown away at how the odds are so stacked against you and then reason and after reason compounds and builds and then you just say "oh forget it, i mean it's impossible".
I'm hoping.anyway, do the things that you like in group settings, if at all possible, and you'll probably end up meeting many quite similar to you. i wouldn't give up hope yet
ChristianGradStudent said:From what I read in your profile (i.e. your love of sine waves, etc.), I'd almost be willing to bet money that you're either INTJ or INTP.
I couldn't agree more. While 2 ESFJ's or INTP's may share many of the same characteristics purely because of their type, there is much to be said for things such as gender and environmental influences. A male who is an F or a female who is a T might show a lot of characteristics of their own gender. The male who is naturally an F might have been reared to act like a T and the female who is more of a T might have been reared to act like an F. An SP with 2 NF parents might have more of an ability to look at future consequences of actions than one who has 2 SP parents. Though MBTI type is definitely a good way to figure out how to communicate better with people or who you might get along better with, a person is much more than just 4 letters.invisiblebabe said:Yeah, me tooThe MBTI definitely has value to it.. however it is not the be-all and end-all of personality and relationships (but is anything?).
invisiblebabe said:I am moderately introverted and extremely abstract in thought and communication...I enjoy talking about all sorts of theories, ideas, and thoughts about God and about life and any other randomness I come up withI believe I would be best matched with a guy who shares these characteristics (and very obviously, along with a solid Christian faith and strong desire to follow God).
The caveat, though: According to the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (personality inventory that I have studied very extensively), only about 4% of the population is like me in this manner.Reduce that to males around my age and Christians only, and you're looking at even less. And how about reducing it even farther, to those guys who would be interested in me that way?
I guess what I am asking here is, though I know God can provide beyond our wildest dreams..... am I dreaming a bit too big here?
Like I said, it isn't about the test itself... that's just the most comprehensive way to put into words what I've found to be most compatiblecarmi said:God has plans for you (these plans may be according to your wildest dreams or they might go completely against your dreams). Love requires a choice. And you might one day stand in front of the choice to accept the man God says is right for you or to take someone who fits a type indicator. In other words, you need to choose whether you want a match made in heaven (made by God) or a match made by tests results (based on human knowledge).
I'm confused here... if a guy is not everything I need ("completely against my dreams," as you put it), how then could he be 100% right for me?You are concerned about your 4 % chances for a match (actually less because - as you already pointed out - you need to reduce this number by males in your age and males who are Christians). God does not give you a 4 % chance, He gives you one man who is 100 % right for you. Just one man.
invisiblebabe said:I'm confused here... if a guy is not everything I need ("completely against my dreams," as you put it), how then could he be 100% right for me?