- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,726
- 52,530
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
"Neo-Darwinism" anagrams to "weird mansion".Another quote from Marshall:
"Neo-Darwinism is actually dead..."
Another quote from Marshall:
"Neo-Darwinism is actually dead..."
Marshall boasts on his website about how his thread on the Internet Infidels was the longest in their history.Another quote from Marshall:
"Neo-Darwinism is actually dead..."
So Perry is a conspiracy nut, too. Who would of thought it?"You are fighting the economic machine of science itself..." is what Perry Marshall says about Michael Behe's work. I've never considered that aspect of the never ending debate.
<snort> This quotation strongly suggests (a) that Perry Marshall knows squat about real science and science funding, and (b) that Perry Marshall is not the brightest fellow on the planet."You are fighting the economic machine of science itself..." is what Perry Marshall says about Michael Behe's work.
Wow -- 4004-2242 BC -- then AD 1603-1625.
That's some dodging!
As opposed to James MMXIX?You really do love James I...
As opposed to James MMXIX?
([King] James McGraw-Hill)
IOW plant his tares?For all I know (or care) you might want to place him between you and God as well...
the Bible, King James... you have so many tares already between you and Him... are you browsing for another?IOW plant his tares?
Are you talking to me?I barely heard of any of these guys yesterday...
*stumbled across that video...
**Do you have a link to the thread(s) you mentioned?
So Perry is a conspiracy nut, too. Who would of thought it?
<snort> This quotation strongly suggests (a) that Perry Marshall knows squat about real science and science funding, and (b) that Perry Marshall is not the brightest fellow on the planet.
LOL -- too funny!
Accounting Error of the BeastDistant neighbor of the beast?
I believe he was referring to Darwinism...as being all that science has going for it right now, economically speaking, at least, in the minds of evolutionists.
His comments seem to suggest that he believes evolutionary scientists are afraid that they will lose funding (their jobs) if Darwinism is too well, and too furiously shown to be obsolete.
This is just how I interpreted the conversation of the video...I am not up on any of this stuff...so.
The "economic machine" of science provides very little incentive either to study or to accept evolution. It's tough to get funding for purely evolutionary studies -- if biologists want money they're better off studying cancer or baldness. Just who is supposed to be behind this economic pressure? The politicians who set funding priorities? The other scientists who judge competing grant applications? Why would scientists promote something they didn't think was valid?How so?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?