Could there be an evolution? Sure, but what about the forces that are driving it, where do they come from?
Variation (through mutation), passed on via heredity and conserved/exhausted through natural selection.
Where do laws of physics come from?
The 'laws' of physics are just human descriptions of observed physical phenomena.
It may be that universes capable of supporting intelligent life are only possible within a small range of certain physical parameters. Or, it may be that there are other universes that have different physical characteristics to our own.
How is it possible that gravity, energy etc can be messured? How can that there be equations so precise?
Math is a symbolic language (actually a series of languages) invented by humans to describe reality. It's not surprising then that it can be used to describe the universe.
If you say there is no God, then life is just a coincidence,
It may be 'just coincidence', it may be inevitable. There's no way (at present) to ascertain which.
and so is your brain, how can you then trust your brain, how can you trust your conclusions and judgement?
I don't. At least, not fully.
I've learnt to trust my brain through dint of repetition and intersubjective agreement. All my conclusions/judgements, except those involving labels/names and escoteric claims, are tentative. They are subject to revision should better or confounding evidence come along.
However, a chair is a chair. A rock is a rock. 1+1=2. And the available evidence supports life being at least 3.7 billion years old and having undergone constant evolution since then.
If you say we can trust our minds, that's the effect, what caused that? We trust ourselves because we were created, if we were not, why do people trust each other when everything is just random and nothing has any meaning?
Who said everything is just random? Evolution doesn't make any claims about the randomness (or otherwise) of the universe. Or of life.
Just because there's no externally defined meaning, doesn't mean that meaning doesn't exist.
If you can trust your thoughts, then it is because your brain was designed.
Evidence is needed to support this conclusion.
It is the reason why we trust our computers for example. Would you trust a computer if it was not designed?
Faulty comparison. All instances we have of computers are known to be designed. No instances we have of life are known to be designed. But all instanced we have of life are known to have evolved.
How can our bodies be complex if no one designed them?
How can our bodies be so poorly constructed if something designed them?
If there is no creator, how can there be life from no life?
Abiogenesis isn't a solved question, but there are several plausible pathways from non-life to life. The general outline is that under some environmental conditions basic chemicals are known to combine into amino acids. These interact, and in their interactions they can spontaneously combine into more complex chains. These chains form novel and complex shapes capable of self replication, and these have been show to subsequently combine into basic encapsulated "cells" (for lack of a better word).
Evolution (if you say there is no God) never made any sense in the first place. It's bunch of non-sense, because if we say we were not created, then everything is just random and so are our brains, so how can we trust them for science?
People are generally down on things they aren't up on. What's your level of education when talking about evolution?
Also, if you want to express your argument better, I suggest looking up Alvin Plantinga's 'Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism'.
Law of Biogenesis says that in nature, life comes from previously existing life of its own kind. Every single science experiment ever done in Biology proves this to be true.
The 'Law of Biogenesis' isn't a thing. It's an invention of creationists, and/or a retelling of Pasteur's refutation of spontaneous generation. There's no law in biology that states that life cannot come from simpler, non-living prebiotic molecules.
