david_x
I So Hate Consequences!!!!
There are two consistent ways for me:
1. I accept everyone as Christian who considers themselves to be one
2. I decide who of you guys are TrueChristiansTM.
I used to be under the impression that the first option was fairer and more respectful than the latter. However, if you want me to be the judge...any time.
Your "bank owner" analogy is apples and elephants.
Whether someone is a bank owner or not depends on one clearly defined criterium: does he own a bank?
Unless you can demonstrate how the definition of "bank owner" is under dispute (in the way the definition of "Christian" is under dispute among different branches of Christianity and any label for any ideology is under dispute among different branches of that ideology), your analogy ignores the very core of the problem.
Typically Christians don´t disagree who´s a Christian because they disagree who matches their definition, but because they work from different definitions, in the first place.
There is a very definitive group of Christians that are part of the Universal Church. These include most protestant, most Roman Catholic, and many Orthodox. (Can't say everyone because there are always the "Sunday morning Christians" and other fakers.)
Upvote
0