Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I am done with you wasting my time.
What is your wholly Divinely inspired infallible supreme standard?
Dream on. Genealogy does not establish validity of faith in the kingdom of God (Romans 2:28,29) while if being the magisterial stewards of Scriptures over the instruments of it meant such possessed ensured veracity and warranted unconditional assent then the NT church is invalidated.My Church IS the New Testament Church as the original Apostles established Her... The Eastern Orthodox Faith is the Faith Communion that gave you the New Testament... Mine happens to be the Church in Antioch, where the followers of Christ were first called Christians...
Do you know what they were called prior to Antioch being discipled by Paul?
I do not think it is mentioned in the Bible,
so you may want to reject it out of hand,
but the Followers of Christ prior to Antioch were called:
"The Followers of the Way..."
That Church, in which the Apostle Peter also served in his departure from persecutions by the Jews, later became one of the 5 major Apostolic Sees... Our Bible, you see, is the Greek Witness, of which you have but a VERSION...
The Woman at the Well had a name...
Do you know her name?
It was not written in the Bible, but it exists nonetheless...
Her name was Photini...
Do you know the name of the little child?
The one Christ took upon his knee?
"Permit the Children to come unto me..."
He became an Episkopos...
And was martyred in Rome...
In the circus, eaten by lions...
He wrote to the Churches enroute...
His name was Ignatius of Antioch...
What I am trying to slip into your understanding is this:
Christ did not FAIL to establish the Holy People of God on earth...
The Bible is a WITNESS of the Faith of that Holy People of God...
They are as a WHOLE [Kata Holon, Catholic] the Body of Christ...
Christ did not FAIL, you see, as you so insist that He did fail...
That He failed for 1500 years until the German Printing Presses came along...
And then lucky for us all, Luther also came along with a printed Bible...
And every man now can read for himself and determine for himself...
His very own private understanding of what the Bible says...
YOU, you see, claim I am denigrating and attacking the Bible...
Constantly do you shove that accusationin my face...
And you are right, if only by my sins in this life...
But the counter to this accusation of yours is more than triple...
For you are accusing God of failing to establish His Body upon the earth...
And that only now has the ingenuity of man...
The ingenuity inventing the printing presses...
Come to the rescue of God's failed attempt...
God did not fail...
And for YOU, my Brother, may I please be permitted to insist...
LOOK at the success of God for the first thousand years...
And THEN, looking at that success and explaining HOW it succeeded...
Show how Christianity today is superior in any way...
To that in the first, third and 9th centuries...
God did not fail until the printing presses saved His efforts...
Many of our greatest and miracle working Saints...
Could neither read noor write...
But they KNEW God...
Which is what Christianity is all about, or it is nothing...
Nothing but an anthropologist's "Belief System"
On a par with any other "belief system"...
Arsenios
Dream on. Genealogy does not establish validity of faith in the kingdom of God (Romans 2:28,29) while if being the magisterial stewards of Scriptures over the instruments of it meant such possessed ensured veracity and warranted unconditional assent then the NT church is invalidated.
And long before the printing press writing was manifest as being God's chosen most-reliable means of preservation of His authoritative word, for He did not fail to do so. (Exodus 17:14; 34:1,27; Deuteronomy 10:4; 17:18; 27:3; 31:24; Joshua 1:8; 2 Chronicles 34:15,18-19; Psalm 19:7-11; 119; John 20:31; Acts 17:11; Revelation 1:1; 20:12, 15; Matthew 4:5-7; 22:29; Luke 24:44,45; Acts 17:11)
And as abundantly evidenced that as written, Scripture became the transcendent supreme standard for obedience and testing and establishing truth claims as the wholly Divinely inspired substantive and assured Word of God.
Upon which the church was established,
and which is never shown to be wholly pure or wholly Truth or the basis for the Truth or the infallible standard of it, but the support of the Truth with instruments of it (and even the writers of Holy Writ are subject to what God is the real author if) - despite your erroneous extrapolation of 1 Timothy 3:15 ,
Which has been substantiated before but you still engage in your fallacious reasoning, for all to see.
Now before you successfully provoke me to provide you with a warranted rebuke that can get me banned...
And the king went up into the house of the Lord, and all the men of Judah, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem, and the priests, and the Levites, and all the people, great and small: and he read in their ears all the words of the book of the covenant that was found in the house of the Lord. And the king stood in his place, and made a covenant before the Lord, to walk after the Lord, and to keep his commandments, and his testimonies, and his statutes, with all his heart, and with all his soul, to perform the words of the covenant which are written in this book. (2 Chronicles 34:30-31)
You and your exaltation of your church (even Israel was a nation and royal priesthood and treated as His body and wife, but was subject to His word as supreme) and continued logical fallacies (God vs. His word etc.) and extensively refuted arguments are being ignored with no more than this, and will be as warranted.Well, it sure didn't under the Law of Moses, no question - But you cannot use OT Scripture to invalidate the New Testament Church...
There is no question concerning their value... But they have a Source, you see, and our Union with that Source is their object - eg As your Psalm verse affirms:
Ps. 19:11 "...in keeping of them there is great reward..."
You see, the Law was rarely kept, so that the "great reward", which is God Himself, was rarely attained, and in the OT, those who did attain God were the Prophets... But that all changed, you see, from the time of John the Baptist until now, for the Kingdom of Heaven is suffering violence... etc.
And Matt 4:5-7 simply shows that Satan used Scripture to [try, mind you.to] get Jesus to sin, and Jesus replied in kind, according to the "wiles of the enemy"... "Let them fall into their own nets"...
That is why I answer you from Scripture, because you believe in Scripture and only argue from it, "...and for the Sola's, I became as a Sola, becoming all things for all men, that I might save some..." Paraphrasing the Apostle... For which, of course, you accuse me of "resorting to Scripture" to prove my case! Lord have Mercy! Thereby proving that no good deed goes unpunished, I say!
Christ IS the Word of God, not Scripture... Scripture records God's WORDS...
The NT Church was established by God, Discipled by Christ-God, in obedience to God the Father, and empowered at Pentecost by God the Holy Spirit... Are we reading the Same Bible?
You mean where the House of God is identified by the Apostle as the Ekklesia of God which is the Ground [eg your "sure foundation"] and the Pillar [eg open display and proclamation] of the Truth, which we all know as the Body of Christ, Who is the Head of His Own Body? Is that the passage I am so erroneous about? I have not seen you ever actually engage those words... Maybe I missed something?
Pillars are there to be seen, no question...
Can you forgive me for provoking you with an understanding with which you simply disagree? I mean, it has a 2000 year pedigree, and much more than that, truth be known... Whereas your thesis that the Written is supreme, and not the God Who GAVE it to be written, is patently false on its face... eg Moses got the Written [in stones] FROM GOD, Who is VASTLY superior to both the stones and to Moses, and the Jews had to be shielded from Moses' holy face from that God-direct encounter... And THAT encounter is what Christians are discipled to attain in the New Testament Church... And the Written is a PART of that discipleship...
The Law kept is a wonderful start, and needs the King to command it for the people...
Who can argue against that?
But the Law was only a tutor -
The written Law is not supreme over God...
We disciple people for God in obedience to Christ as members of His Body, the Church...
Christ discipled His disciples...
Christ did not disciple Scripture to His disciples...
He fulfilled those Scriptures...
And we are called to follow Him...
So don't get all in a huff now and get yourself banned by what you will doubtless regard as giving me a well earned and perhaps soul-shattering rebuke... Because I like you here, even if you think I am some kind of Satan incarnate, and speaking with you gives me great Joy... But the truth be known, all things bring great Joy to this old man, and I recognize in you a similar Joy, but one which is perhaps a tad too easily provoked...
Love is patient, Love is Kind, Love is not easily provoked...
Thank you for the kindness of your prayers...
And for the goodness of your aging heart...
Gravity is a grave matter, I say!
For He hath remembered that we are dust...
And besides, by my geriatric standards, you, at a youthful and spritely mere 65, are still just a young whipper-snapper!
Arsenios
So God who quoting Scripture, commands us as it is written, "Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God" (Matthew 4:4) and abundantly invoked Scripture as the authoritative word of God, which He exalts above the church or individual as being wholly inspired and alive and powerful and instrumentally salvific and equipping for every good work, (John 6:63; Hebrews 4:12; 2 Timothy 3:15-17) and which is to dwell richly in believers, (Colossians 3:16) and by which man shall be judged, (John 12:48) does not provide a sure supreme source of that, by which Truth claims can be tested, or is the interpreter himself that sure supreme standard? Are you in a country without a Constitution simply because it can be interpreted?None exists. You always have to use reason and care.
Where in the Bible does the Bible state that the Bible is the Final Authority?
INSPIRED and USEFUL is hardly FINAL AUTHORITY...
This proves that God is the Final Authority, not the Bible... Because the Final Authority, God, CAUSED the Bible to be written by men...
This proves utterly and clearly that God is the Final Authority...
The Bible is not God's peer...
You complain that Latin Catholics make their Pope the Final Authority, and in that cause you now make a BOOK of paper and ink your Final Authority? I mean, are the STONES on which God inscribed the 10 Commandments the Final Authority?
Or is GOD the Final Authority?
I am having a hard time believing that I have to argue for this...
God, by His Incarnation, moved the arena of human salvation from the lifeless and cold stones of the Commandments and the Law into the living and fleshly warm hearts of real and living men and women walking this earth... And now you want to make the Holy Book of God Superior to God? And this when that Book itself tells all who will hear: "The Church is the Ground and the Pillar of the Truth - It is the Body of Christ Who is the Head of His Own Body."
I am not scandalized, exactly, but the whole idea is, after all, pretty crackers...
er... Make that TOTALLY crackers!
What makes it plausible is the fact that when one reads the Bible, God works through the Bible in the hearts of those who read and believe it... But the proper response is not to deify the Bible, but to glorify God, who needs no deification...
Mind you...
Lord have Mercy!
Arsenios
My Church IS the New Testament Church as the original Apostles established Her... The Eastern Orthodox Faith is the Faith Communion that gave you the New Testament... Mine happens to be the Church in Antioch, where the followers of Christ were first called Christians...
Do you know what they were called prior to Antioch being discipled by Paul?
I do not think it is mentioned in the Bible,
so you may want to reject it out of hand,
but the Followers of Christ prior to Antioch were called:
"The Followers of the Way..."
That Church, in which the Apostle Peter also served in his departure from persecutions by the Jews, later became one of the 5 major Apostolic Sees... Our Bible, you see, is the Greek Witness, of which you have but a VERSION...
The Woman at the Well had a name...
Do you know her name?
It was not written in the Bible, but it exists nonetheless...
Her name was Photini...
Do you know the name of the little child?
The one Christ took upon his knee?
"Permit the Children to come unto me..."
He became an Episkopos...
And was martyred in Rome...
In the circus, eaten by lions...
He wrote to the Churches enroute...
His name was Ignatius of Antioch...
What I am trying to slip into your understanding is this:
Christ did not FAIL to establish the Holy People of God on earth...
The Bible is a WITNESS of the Faith of that Holy People of God...
They are as a WHOLE [Kata Holon, Catholic] the Body of Christ...
Christ did not FAIL, you see, as you so insist that He did fail...
That He failed for 1500 years until the German Printing Presses came along...
And then lucky for us all, Luther also came along with a printed Bible...
And every man now can read for himself and determine for himself...
His very own private understanding of what the Bible says...
YOU, you see, claim I am denigrating and attacking the Bible...
Constantly do you shove that accusationin my face...
And you are right, if only by my sins in this life...
But the counter to this accusation of yours is more than triple...
For you are accusing God of failing to establish His Body upon the earth...
And that only now has the ingenuity of man...
The ingenuity inventing the printing presses...
Come to the rescue of God's failed attempt...
God did not fail...
And for YOU, my Brother, may I please be permitted to insist...
LOOK at the success of God for the first thousand years...
And THEN, looking at that success and explaining HOW it succeeded...
Show how Christianity today is superior in any way...
To that in the first, third and 9th centuries...
God did not fail until the printing presses saved His efforts...
Many of our greatest and miracle working Saints...
Could neither read noor write...
But they KNEW God...
Which is what Christianity is all about, or it is nothing...
Nothing but an anthropologist's "Belief System"
On a par with any other "belief system"...
Arsenios
None of those Scriptures comes even close to saying that the Bible is the final authority. They say that the Bible is an authority - nobody denies that. They do not say - they do not even suggest - that the Bible is the FINAL authority. You've cobbled together the primary tenet of your religion from spit and tissue paper, and it's false.
Since you're not going to repent of it, and I'm not going to ignore the error, it's best that we walk apart in peace. This difference cannot be reconciled.
Welcome to the club of people who like to say that. Over here we have Roman Catholics and over there Mormons, and of course there are the Landmarker Baptists. It's a diverse group but all bound together by their insistence that their own denomination is the one and only.My Church IS the New Testament Church as the original Apostles established Her
I've read this line before, but surely you must know that the Bible books existed in antiquity irrespective of the number of people who were literate. Or do you?God did not fail until the printing presses saved His efforts...
Many of our greatest and miracle working Saints...
Could neither read noor write...
But they KNEW God...
The church is made up of SINNERS and you are insisting that they are the ones to be believed and accepted over and above the Word of God.
That is why I can not believe you are arguing this point.
I agree. I find it implausible that you are arguing this case.
Isaiah 55:11.........
"So shall My Word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper [in the thing] whereto I sent it."
This is 'absolute authority' speaking. There are no conditions attached, no restrictions and no limitations.
This statement indicates the sovereignty of the One who spoke the Word and the absolute perfection of the Word spoken - it needs nothing added to it or taken from it.
To the Believer, the Holy Bible is the 'Divinely Inspired' Word of God;
the ultimate standard of measurement for Christian conduct, Church order and doctrine.
Psalms119:89.........
"Forever, O Lord, Thy Word is settled in heaven".
This is but another confirmation of the 'absolute authority', 'finality' and 'conclusiveness' of the Word of God.
It is impossible for us to improve upon the Divine revelation contained within it's pages.
So perfect is His Word that God issued this warning in Deut. 4:2......
"Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it,....."!
Forever, O Lord, Thy Word is settled in heaven.
Psalms ll9:89.
Now to suggest that I or anyone else who accepts the Word of God as found in the Bible makes us IDOL Worshipers is very disingenuous. YOU are condemning Bible believers because they accept the Bible as the Word of God BUT on the other hand you are saying that the CHURCH is the final authority.
The church is made up of SINNERS and you are insisting that they are the ones to be believed and accepted over and above the Word of God.
That is why I can not believe you are arguing this point.
Just so that there are no misunderstanding on this point, your exact words were........
"And now you want to make the Holy Book of God Superior to God ? "
NO ONE IS SAYING THAT. NO ONE HAS SAID THAT!!!!
It clearly needs to be established and understood that no one or no thing is equal to God. The Creator and Sustainer of the Universe is infinite in all of His glorious attributes. He alone is omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient.
The Son of God is the God - Man and He is God in the flesh the only accountable person never to sin as recorded in Hebrews 4:15. The one and only reason that we know those facts is because they are found IN THE WORD OF GOD!
It has always been wrong to attempt to put men, even Bible writers, the Bible or the Church on par with God.
Only the wicked try to elevate themselves to the status of deity.
Indeed it is this very Apostle Paul who ESTABLISHED the Church in Antioch over one winter...Acts 22:4...........
"I persecuted the followers of this Way to their death, arresting both men and women and throwing them into prison".
Welcome to the club of people who like to say that. Over here we have Roman Catholics and over there Mormons, and of course there are the Landmarker Baptists. It's a diverse group but all bound together by their insistence that their own denomination is the one and only.
I've read this line before, but surely you must know that the Bible books existed in antiquity irrespective of the number of people who were literate. Or do you?
I suppose you make your claim with the belief that Sola Scriptura means or requires that every last person read and understand the Bible from his own reading. It doesn't.
Major1 makes an interesting point here. Didn't Jesus asks sinners (the Apostles) to serve him? After His resurrection, didn't Jesus appear to them and commissioned them to be his evangelizers? (Mk.16:15) And they obeyed. (Mk.16:20)
Maj.1 is correct in saying the Church is made up of "sinners" ......as were all the apostles. So is he (Maj1) suggesting or insisting that they too are not to be believed or we are not to accept their writings because of their sinfullness? If Maj.1 thinks we must judge by others by their conduct, then he better toss out his bible, because all its authors were sinners.
And he has a hard time believing or arguing the point? Very interesting!
Bible-Alone cannot avoid IDIO-SYNCRATIC understanding...I agree with you and I do not blame you at all. If I were you and had all my religious theology turned upside down I would cut and run too.
Merely to claim that Sacred Tradition is equal and in agreement with the Bible does not make it so. Furthermore, to assert that Sacred Tradition is equal to Scripture effectively leaves the canon wide open to doctrinal addition. Since the traditions of men change, then to use tradition as a determiner of spiritual truth would mean that over time new doctrines that are not in the Bible would be added, and that is exactly what has happened in Catholicism with doctrines such as purgatory, praying to Mary, indulgences, etc.
Furthermore, if they can use Sacred Tradition as a source for doctrines not explicit in the Bible, then why would the Mormons or JW's or even Muslims then be wrong for having additional revelation as well?
I agree with you and I do not blame you at all. If I were you and had all my religious theology turned upside down I would cut and run too.
Merely to claim that Sacred Tradition is equal and in agreement with the Bible does not make it so. Furthermore, to assert that Sacred Tradition is equal to Scripture effectively leaves the canon wide open to doctrinal addition. Since the traditions of men change, then to use tradition as a determiner of spiritual truth would mean that over time new doctrines that are not in the Bible would be added, and that is exactly what has happened in Catholicism with doctrines such as purgatory, praying to Mary, indulgences, etc.
Furthermore, if they can use Sacred Tradition as a source for doctrines not explicit in the Bible, then why would the Mormons or JW's or even Muslims then be wrong for having additional revelation as well?
That did not make it into Ripley's, and I myself have clearly affirmed the supremacy of God - despite the apparent blindness of some to that as well as to their own illogic - while if we were follow the same logic that reasons that making the something on earth to be the supreme authority on Truth means they must be making this source Superior to God, then the church would be since Catholics make that the supreme authority, but which is nowhere ensured doctrinal infallibility.Now to suggest that I or anyone else who accepts the Word of God as found in the Bible makes us IDOL Worshipers is very disingenuous. YOU are condemning Bible believers because they accept the Bible as the Word of God BUT on the other hand you are saying that the CHURCH is the final authority.
The church is made up of SINNERS and you are insisting that they are the ones to be believed and accepted over and above the Word of God.
That is why I can not believe you are arguing this point.
Which should know by now never to supreme as the conclusions of some. The error here is one of category, in God is supreme over all, and within the Godhead the Father is greater in position than the Son, but in terms of revelation, God has made His word the supreme authority on Truth, and has even magnified it above His name. And had made writing the chosen mean of preservation of it, including that of Christ, the express visible revelation of the person of God, come in the flesh.Just so that there are no misunderstanding on this point, your exact words were........
"And now you want to make the Holy Book of God Superior to God? "
NO ONE IS SAYING THAT. NO ONE HAS SAID THAT!!!!
It clearly needs to be established and understood that no one or no thing is equal to God. The Creator and Sustainer of the Universe is infinite in all of His glorious attributes. He alone is omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?