Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You won't answer it because you can't.Are you kidding me? I will not answer your question. Sorry. You can find the answer on YouTube if you like.
Yeah. Whatever you say.You won't answer it because you can't.
According to the theory of evolution, through a process called speciation.According to the The theory of evolution, if a mother never gives birth to a child of a new species, then where do new species come from?
That’s not evolution. LolIndeed, this is the only way new species can come to be, at least according to evolution.
At least this we can agree on.They don't come from outer space.
And in the process of speciation, if a mother does not give birth to a baby of a new species, then where do new species come from?Yeah. Whatever you say.
According to the theory of evolution, through a process called speciation.
That’s not evolution. Lol
At least this we can agree on.
Face it, you're unable to answer the question.
Nice video btw. So if you watch the video, they go from 200, to 1200 to some very large number of generations. At some point in time, a bird will be born, a single individual, in which it's mating call would be rejected by the original species. All populations begin as individuals, the fundamental component of populations. Can't have a population without individuals.
I don't have to answer your question. The video does. Did you watch it? Did you understand it?Face it, you're unable to answer the question.
What you think is evolution is not evolution. What you think Genesis says is not what Genesis says. So go ahead and think what you think.Think about it this way. We are homo sapiens. We are members of a species. At some point in time, unless we were all simultaneously born instantaneously, according to evolution and the process of speciation, one of us must have been born first, right?
Exactly. By the ORIGINAL species. You know what a second cousin thrice removed is? Like that, only much more removed. The individual's own parents or brothers and sisters are the same species as the individual.Nice video btw. So if you watch the video, they go from 200, to 1200 to some very large number of generations. At some point in time, a bird will be born, a single individual, in which it's mating call would be rejected by the original species. All populations begin as individuals, the fundamental component of populations. Can't have a population without individuals.
Once the mating call is rejected by the original, the population is identified as a new species. Meaning that the bird making the mating call, is of the new species. Even if it's siblings are not rejected in the same way.Exactly. By the ORIGINAL species. You know what a second cousin thrice removed is? Like that, only much more removed. It's own mom or brothers and sisters are the same species as the individual.
Or, you could consider this as well. If the birds call was rejected, and it's siblings calls were rejected as well, we would identify them as members of a new species, but of course of the bird and it's siblings, one still had to be born first. Of the new species, one of the individuals came before the rest. Which is to say that one was born first of a mother of the original species.Once the mating call is rejected by the original, the population is identified as a new species. Meaning that the bird making the mating call, is of the new species. Even if it's siblings are not rejected in the same way.
It's siblings would be rejected in the same way. If it's siblings are not rejected in the same way, it's not a new species, it's just an awkward individual. The definition of species is a group of individuals that are able to interbreed. Different species - as in groups - do not interbreed.Once the mating call is rejected by the original, the population is identified as a new species. Meaning that the bird making the mating call, is of the new species. Even if it's siblings are not rejected in the same way.
And if it's siblings are rejected in the same way, as I've said, one still had to be born first. If you have 10 birds, all rejected and Identified as a new species, one was still born first. Just because they're of a new species, doesn't mean they weren't born of mothers.It's siblings would be rejected in the same way. If it's siblings are not rejected in the same way, it's not a new species, it's just an awkward individual. The definition of species is a group of individuals that are able to interbreed. Different species - as in groups - do not interbreed.
Look at, don't argue with me. I didn't invent this theory. Go argue with Darwin or something.Or, you could consider this as well. If the birds call was rejected, and it's siblings calls were rejected as well, we would identify them as members of a new species, but of course of the bird and it's siblings, one still had to be born first. If the new species, one of the individuals came before the rest. Which is to say that one was born first of a mother of the original species.
If you did not understand the video, how do you think I can explain it to you?In the theory of evolution, there is no other way for members of a new species to come into existence but through birth. They don't teleport in from space do they? No, they come from a mother. And one has to be born first, unless you think they all instantaneously appeared at the same time out of thin air.
Sounds like you don't understand the subject. Which is why you can't answer the question. If not born of mothers, where do you think members of a new species come from? According to evolution? They don't fly in from outer space. They don't spring up out of the earth. Members of New species, according to evolution, are born of mothers.Look at, don't argue with me. I didn't invent this theory. Go argue with Darwin or something.
If you did not understand the video, how do you think I can explain it to you?
Sure they had mothers. But their mothers (as gross as it may sound) would not have rejected them. So their mothers are the same species. Their cousins are the ones rejecting them. Speciation doesn't happen through mothers, it happens through cousins. After a very long time of being physically separated.And if it's siblings are rejected in the same way, as I've said, one still had to be born first. If you have 10 birds, all rejected and Identified as a new species, one was still born first. Just because they're of a new species, doesn't mean they weren't born of mothers.
And I'm not arguing with the theory, I'm arguing with your misunderstanding of it.Sounds like you don't understand the subject. Which is why you can't answer the question. If not born of mothers, where do you think members of a new species come from? According to evolution? They don't fly in from outer space. They don't spring up out of the earth. Members of New species, according to evolution, are born of mothers.
And I'm sorry if you're confused about how biology works.
No. Cousins.Sounds like you don't understand the subject. Which is why you can't answer the question. If not born of mothers, where do you think members of a new species come from? According to evolution? They don't fly in from outer space. They don't spring up out of the earth. Members of New species, according to evolution, are born of mothers.
LOLAnd I'm sorry if you're confused about how biology works.
And I'm not arguing with the theory, I'm arguing with your misunderstanding of it.
Sure they had mothers. But their mothers (as gross as it may sound) would not have rejected them. So their mothers are the same species. Their cousins are the ones rejecting them. Speciation doesn't happen through mothers, it happens through cousins. After a very long time of being physically separated.
That group of birds, sureOk so that bird that is rejected, we agree is of a new species,
The individual bird - noand that it is still the first of a new species.
It's mother is the same species as the birdAnd...it came from a mother. Right? We don't retroactively go back and change it's mother to the new species as well.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?