L
Leap
Guest
I think that it is both disingenuous and inaccurate to deny that egg-producing individuals are female whether sperm is needed for reproduction or not, especially as I have given citations for this assertion and you have not given any for your position.
An egg needs fertilising.
If it doesn't need fertilising, it is not an egg (even if it open to being influenced by sperm - which is not 'fertilization', as that would require it needing such sperm to become life).
I don't need to cite web sources. You can go to any biology text and find out that the male produces the sperm, the female produces the egg, and both are needed to make life. That is what the sexes are - the two roles in sexual reproduction, and the only attempt at an argument you can make relies on a tiny number of species a long way down the evolutionary chain that cross the boundary of sexual and asexual reproduction.
Seriously, if this is your argument you are just looking really quite desperate and silly.
Upvote
0