Now you are saying you did not argue this...
"and that it is downright "toxic" to believe that Jesus can help those who suffer." That is what I am saying you did.
In the OP -
"
Carl Emerson said:
At the same time, believers have access to the redemption of the soul through the Cross, including healing and deliverance - but not many seem to access this because the modern theology has moved on from these 'archaic beliefs'."
Your post 56 -
"
Carl Emerson said:
Personally I think a big part of the problem is that Churches have lost touch with the healing grace available through the Cross and abdicated responsibility for the flock to 'professional services'.
Elders are not seen as the 'go to' source of healing prayer because of poor or little biblical teaching.
Your response to him is "
Most of what you’ve written in this thread is nothing more than toxic, over-spiritualized nonsense"
I am under the impression that
Carl Emerson would like to see more people recieve Jesus' love, grace and healing from conditions we in the modern world call "mental health problems", and that he is not ashamed to share his own beliefs about what happened to him, as a testimony to Jesus helping with such things. I am also under the impression that you believe what he is doing is
toxic, over-spiritualized nonsense.
I am sorry if I have misunderstood, however, that the best I can do to explain what I thought you meant.