• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Can we estimate the probability?

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
Well, I don't think our existence explicitely indicates the existence of a deity- there are other plausible alternatives. From my point of view, our existence is just a one of plethora of personal evidence for the Creator.


personal evidence?
 
Upvote 0

SharpSolaris

in the mind
Apr 14, 2011
81
4
45
✟22,721.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
"So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them."

If we could create an artificial intelligence - AI1 and AI1 ​​could create an AI2 (and etc), probability that we are AI - increases​.
More the "levels", more the probability. If "levels" will become more and more... How we shall be able to justify our own uniqueness?
---
I do not expect any comments.
 
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
40
London
✟45,012.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
"So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them."

If we could create an artificial intelligence - AI1 and AI1 ​​could create an AI2 (and etc), probability that we are AI - increases​.
More the "levels", more the probability. If "levels" will become more and more... How we shall be able to justify our own uniqueness?
---
I do not expect any comments.

What relevance does our uniqueness have?
 
Upvote 0

Brak

Newbie
Jan 12, 2011
1,097
61
✟31,544.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Calculating the probability is a non-linear problem. I think about how I would calculate the probability by formulating a neural network. Granted, it's going to be a really, really big neural network, and there is no way the biggest supercomputer could ever compute it, but one can still theorize.

The problem with calculating the probability via a neural network is that you have to train the neural network. For that to occur, you have to feed it a bunch of inputs presuming that there is a God. And then, you have to feed it a bunch of inputs presuming there is not. And then you feed it some real inputs mirroring reality, and the neural net spits out a probability that there is a God. Except, we don't have the data where it is known for sure there is a God or when it is not. The latter--the reality--is the ONLY data we have. Unless you wish to say that in reality, it is known 100% there is a God, in which case there is no point doing any of this.

So I'm going to say no: there is no way to calculate the probability. Insufficient data.
 
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
40
London
✟45,012.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
AI didn't make ourselves too.

My mistake. I misread the question.

Fine, then it's the opposite. We weren't made by an AI.

Oh and btw:

"If we could create an artificial intelligence - AI1 and AI1 ​​could create an AI2 (and etc), probability that we are AI - increases​"

That is incorrect. Events that happened after an event occurred don't affect it's probability.
 
Upvote 0

SharpSolaris

in the mind
Apr 14, 2011
81
4
45
✟22,721.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
We weren't made by an AI.
That is the question! What makes us unique that we can say: "we weren't made by an AI". What is our feature?

That is incorrect. Events that happened after an event occurred don't affect it's probability.
What about - a statistical probability and statistical significance?
 
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
40
London
✟45,012.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
That is the question! What makes us unique that we can say: "we weren't made by an AI". What is our feature?

Not knowing anything about an AI as they don't yet exist, I couldn't tell you.

What about - a statistical probability and statistical significance?

It doesn't matter what you call it. Events in the future don't change the probability of something that occurred in the past.
 
Upvote 0

Brak

Newbie
Jan 12, 2011
1,097
61
✟31,544.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Brak, provided that the God = a human, we need only calculate the probability of a human.
If A=B and B=C then A=C. Easy?

Whether God is human or not is immaterial. You have to have 3 sets of data:
1) data known to hold true if there was a God
2) data known to hold true if there was no God
3) data which is known true

You have to collect data for 1) and 2) so as to train your equation to estimate the probability of there being a God. Then you feed it 3)--the actual data--correlate the actual data against the data which produces a known result, and out comes your probability. The problem is, 3) is all the data we've got. If we had either 1) or 2), there would probably be no point in coming up with such a silly equation in the first place. Thus the probability cannot be calculated.
 
Upvote 0

SharpSolaris

in the mind
Apr 14, 2011
81
4
45
✟22,721.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Not knowing anything about an AI as they don't yet exist, I couldn't tell you.
Rightly.

It doesn't matter what you call it. Events in the future don't change the probability of something that occurred in the past.
I may be mistaken. I didn't mind.
===
My mistake was that creation of AI is not casually (like tossing a coin). We can not say that we casually did AI. Here work other laws.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

SharpSolaris

in the mind
Apr 14, 2011
81
4
45
✟22,721.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Whether God is human or not is immaterial. You have to have 3 sets of data:
1) data known to hold true if there was a God
2) data known to hold true if there was no God
3) data which is known true

You have to collect data for 1) and 2) so as to train your equation to estimate the probability of there being a God. Then you feed it 3)--the actual data--correlate the actual data against the data which produces a known result, and out comes your probability. The problem is, 3) is all the data we've got. If we had either 1) or 2), there would probably be no point in coming up with such a silly equation in the first place. Thus the probability cannot be calculated.
Why we have to do it so hard? Enough for us to know the probability of favorable conditions for the appearance of human. Temperature, water, oxygen, etc.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

SharpSolaris

in the mind
Apr 14, 2011
81
4
45
✟22,721.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
We need to know 2 things:
1. What is the probability of human existence ?
2. What is the probability that human shall create AI?
Then we need to impose these probabilities. That's all.
===
And I want to say that this is not my belief or principled position. This is just my idle thoughts. Do not take too seriously.
:)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0