vanshan said:
It seems completely different to pay taxes (really just giving the money minted by the U.S. back to the U.S.), which are required by law,
Actually, you are not required by law to pay taxes -- you are required to file them. However, that is beside the point.
than to voluntarily bolster a candidate who will work diligently to insure that atrocities like abortion remain legal.
Cross off all candidates who might support the legality of abortion. Now you can not vote for a Democrat. Cross off all candidates who support providing money and assistance to organizations that promote Islam or Hinduism in the US. Now you can not vote for a Republican. Pick a party. I will be happy to find an immoral position which they support.
I would not necessarily extend this rationale to other areas like boycotting retail chains, because I am simply paying for goods or services and what they do with the money is up to them.
Even if they tell you upfront that the money you give them will be used for immoral practices?
I guess a valid question could be to what extent should we be involved with the political processes of this world, other than standing up for justice and the rights of the weak?
Indeed, it does.
I part of the debate on this subject is misplaced. One can be morally opposed to something without being legally opposed to it. I don't believe that a legal system, especially on that claims to be plural, can be based on morals.
Pre-marital sex is immoral, but I don't think it should be a crime.
Aduletry is immoral, but I don't think it should be a crime.
Homosexual activity is immoral, but I don't think it should be a crime.
Holding racist views is immoral, but I don't think it should be a crime.
Practicing Buddhism is immoral, but I don't think it should be a crime.