But it was still asked of a candidate who had nothing to pardon herself for. Just wait till the Trump pardons start rolling out. Then there will be something to discuss.
Upvote
0
Did you vote for her and consequently feel the need to defend her?But it was still asked of a candidate who had nothing to pardon herself for.
I think something is wrong with the election when it is discussed that both candidates might need to avail themselves of a self-pardon. Something is corrupt big time in both parties. And no, I didn't vote for either of them.Just wait till the Trump pardons start rolling out. Then there will be something to discuss.
Do you hate her so that you need to attack her? No legal authority has charged her with a thing. Is this about political support or a need to justify a prejudice? And, no, I don’t accuse you of any of that. I was just trying to demonstrate the cognitive dissonance of claiming that because someone doesn’t personally accuse someone of things he would have no way of actually knowing about, and that no legal authority has charged (not even the 8 or 9 republican led investigations could come up with a single charge,) that it means that the person has an ulterior motive.Did you vote for her and consequently feel the need to defend her?
I think something is wrong with the election when it is discussed that both candidates might need to avail themselves of a self-pardon. Something is corrupt big time in both parties. And no, I didn't vote for either of them.
Still a silly thing to waste time on. Jon Stewart doesn’t give it any credibility.Jon Stewart, a liberal, said HRC might have to pardon herself if she were to become president.
From Mar 2015:
Jon Stewart: 'Future President Hillary Clinton may have to pardon' herself
.
What do you think discredits him?Still a silly thing to waste time on. Jon Stewart doesn’t give it any credibility.
actually you have somewhat changed my mind. I do think asking whether “Hillary could have...” is a waste of time, but it could have been considered a legitimate issue when it was originally put on somebody’s talking points in 2016. And I wish the discussion had been more widespread then, because those discussions would cause some entertaining discomfort watching pundits on both sides try to figure out a spin to explain why they were all in on one side of the debate before november2018, and all in on the opposite side now. Because nobody puts partisanship ahead of country, do they? Ha.What do you think discredits him?
I don't know about the rest, but in fairness to Hillary, any disk should be scrubbed if it is no longer going to be used for its original purpose. I have seen way too much information that people have left behind on their devices. That someone had the good sense to scrub her server's hd is a smart thing. It does not NECESSARILY imply Hillary is a crook. That comes from other things, like her "with a cloth" comment.Why did Hillary scrub the hd on a server that was in her personal residence?
Are there any rocket scientist in the house?