• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

twin1954

Baptist by the Bible
Jun 12, 2011
4,527
1,474
✟94,054.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
I have and have read Calvin's "Insitutes" so there is no need. The fact is that you want to argue with Calvin but not against the theology that goes by the name of Calvinism. The theology has for a long time evolved and grown into what is now known as Calvinism. If you are honest, which you should be if you are going to claim to be a believer, you would actually find out what the theology called Calvinism actually is instead of building straw men which you can easily tear down. What you have done so far is nothing but a misrepresentation of the truth.
 
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
It is a shame that you didn't actually quote the context of my statement. Scared to? Or are you building a straw man?
I only commented to Patmos on a very short quotation from you that Patmos supplied for me in another conversation.

If it was taken out of context - it was Patmos who did so.

I have no idea, other than that one supposed quotation from you, what you believe.

If you'd like to tell me other things about what you believe - I may well comment on them.

We may well be in agreement on them.

I have no idea where you are coming from with the "scared to" and "straw man" concepts.
 
Upvote 0

Hoghead1

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2015
4,911
741
78
✟8,968.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I have never found any Calvinists yet who have disagreed with Calvin's concept of predestination, not one. If they did, I should wonder why they are called Calvinists. Also, just what are you assuming I am claiming to be a believer in? I never told you anything about my beliefs.
 
Upvote 0

twin1954

Baptist by the Bible
Jun 12, 2011
4,527
1,474
✟94,054.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
I am sorry I meant my post to be directed at Patmos not you.
 
Upvote 0

twin1954

Baptist by the Bible
Jun 12, 2011
4,527
1,474
✟94,054.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
I disagree with Calvin on more than one issue. I actually believe the Scriptural doctrine of predestination which mean that God never predestines things He predestines people. He foreordains things. I call myself a Calvinist because it is much easier than explaining all the doctrines of grace that I hold to without compromise or apology to everyone I speak to. Calvinist seems to relate the basic truths I believe and rest my soul on as being Scriptural.

I did not assume anything but simply responded to what you wrote and the implications of it.
 
Reactions: Marvin Knox
Upvote 0

EmSw

White Horse Rider
Apr 26, 2014
6,434
718
✟74,044.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
"I do believe that God allows us to make choices that impact our salvation.
Neither I nor any Calvinist would say differently."

What choices do the reprobates who have been foreordained to hell have concerning their salvation?

Can they choose differently than what God foreordained for them?
 
Upvote 0

Hoghead1

Well-Known Member
Oct 27, 2015
4,911
741
78
✟8,968.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
In Calvin, God predestines absolutely everything. Calvin is very, very clear on that.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,262
✟583,992.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
The formulas may have relied, to some extent on, extra-Biblical material for their EXPLANATION, but the fact of three persona (or something in that vein) being one God is entirely Scriptural. The Nicene Creed even makes an acknowledgment to Scripture.

I'd argue that if there is some awkwardness in all of this, it owes to our inability as humans to fully comprehend the nature of God. What we have is what He has revealed to us, and we need not press beyond that in order to know his Will and Intentions for us.
 
Reactions: GillDouglas
Upvote 0

nobdysfool

The original! Accept no substitutes!
Feb 23, 2003
15,018
1,006
Home, except when I'm not....
✟21,146.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution


God does allow men to make decisions for themselves, while knowing with absolute certainty (Foreknowledge) of what those choices will be, without influencing them, or making those decisions for them, as is falsely accused. Man is in a linear progression of temporal time, where cause precedes effect, and decisions are not made in a vacuum, but are built on previous decisions and choices, and their outcomes. Factor in man's nature and sometimes even we can deduce what decisions a man is likely to make in a given situation. But God knows with a certainty that we cannot even understand, and can work with those as yet undecided decisions and choices, to move events, people, and situations in the direction He has decided they should go. He IS God, after all...
 
Reactions: GillDouglas
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
How people can say that God's determining beforehand exactly what He would and would not allow to take place in history means somehow that those things cannot include the choices that men make is beyond me.

That isn't a logical conclusion.

It's as if "anti-Calvinists" think that somehow God just deciding what He will allow just as He faces the decision in history is more to be preferred than God deciding before history what He will allow.

Probably someone will jump in and talk about how Calvinists extend this idea right down to every atomic event. But then - to deny that is to deny the very Biblical truth that everything consists, in some mysterious way, of the Word of God and that it has it's existence "in Him".

For some reason some people think that railing against John Calvin and those of the same general philosophy will get them off the theological hook on this issue and issues like it.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: nobdysfool
Upvote 0

Patmos

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2016
471
53
New York
✟893.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

I not arguing against what you believe, rather that what you believe is not that Calvinistic. E.g your description of TD. Despite whatever you call yourself and whatever I call myself, we are very much in accord (I think).

Anyway, be blessed.
 
Upvote 0

Patmos

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2016
471
53
New York
✟893.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Copied from :- BobRyan in the GT thread
==========================

Predestination in its broadest conception is the doctrine that because God is all-powerful, all-knowing, and completely sovereign, he "from all eternity did by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass," (Westminster Confession).

http://www.theopedia.com/predestination

==========================
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

EmSw

White Horse Rider
Apr 26, 2014
6,434
718
✟74,044.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Marvin, did God predestine you to be a lost sinner?
 
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Patmos -

Do you see something in that confession that says anything about those things that come to pass not including the fact that God creates men with wills and includes what they choose to do in His predestination.

I don't. I'm sure that the framers of the Westminster didn't either. Nor do I think that John Calvin would if he had lived to see the WCF.

If you do - please tell me take me through your train of logic.

How much the fall has effected man's ability to choose correctly regarding spiritual things and how God remedies that condition are different theological points and deserve addressing separately.

I'm just referring to the over aching concept of predestination here. Not "fairness", "election", or any other thing that may be brought up.

I'm just asking about this one statement about the meaning of predestination - since so many seem to think that it means men are just robots etc. (which they are clearly not - being created in the image of God).
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

EmSw

White Horse Rider
Apr 26, 2014
6,434
718
✟74,044.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

Albion, where has the following been revealed to man?

Chapter III
God from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass; yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established.

How can man know God's will from all eternity? Where did God reveal to man that He unchangeably ordains whatsoever comes to pass?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

sdowney717

Newbie
Apr 20, 2013
8,712
2,022
✟117,598.00
Faith
Christian
2 Peter 2:19
They promise them freedom, but they themselves are slaves of corruption. For whatever overcomes a person, to that he is enslaved.

As did Jesus also tell some Jews, they were not free but slaves of sin having Satan as their father.
Man in his natural unregenerated condition has a certain freedom of will, but chooses according to that which he is enslaved, so then they willfully choose the sinful desires of the flesh. Those are the logical choices of the natural enslaved mind. Such a mind will not take up and bear the cross of Christ willingly to crucify the passions of the flesh.

But those who belong to Christ will with God's transformative power working within them. That is a fact, those who are in the flesh can not please God, all unregenerate persons can not please God, they are natural man, not spiritual man. We are be worshipping God in SPIRIT and in TRUTH, something the world can never know.

Galatians 5
24 And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires.
 
Reactions: nobdysfool
Upvote 0

Patmos

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2016
471
53
New York
✟893.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The doctrine of predestination was for Calvin a “horrible decree” but, even more, it was “very sweet fruit.” He did not pretend to understand it fully, for that would require that he comprehend God. Yet he could confidently pronounce, “even though… predestination is likened to a dangerous sea, still in traversing it, one finds safe and calm—I add also pleasant—sailing.”


“Let this be our conclusion,” Calvin writes at the close of his discussion of predestination in the Institutes, “to tremble with Paul at so deep a mystery; but, if froward tongues clamor, not to be ashamed of this exclamation of his: ‘Who are you, O man, to argue with God?’ ”


http://www.christianitytoday.com/hi...oth-horrible-decree-and-very-sweet-fruit.html
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

EmSw

White Horse Rider
Apr 26, 2014
6,434
718
✟74,044.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It's as if "anti-Calvinists" think that somehow God just deciding what He will allow just as He faces the decision in history is more to be preferred than God deciding before history what He will allow.

Allow? Why do you now include this word within the confines of predestination? Of all the sites I've visited, NONE include 'allow' in their definition of predestination. The word I see used most is 'decide'. Deciding is not allowing.
 
Upvote 0

Patmos

Well-Known Member
Mar 11, 2016
471
53
New York
✟893.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Allow? Why do you now include this word within the confines of predestination? Of all the sites I've visited, NONE include 'allow' in their definition of predestination. The word I see used most is 'decide'. Deciding is not allowing.
Neither is decree.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.