- Mar 12, 2007
- 4,436
- 543
- Country
- Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Pentecostal
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- AU-Labor
I have written before from my reading Wikipedia and other learnings that I doubt the NAR or new apostolic reformation actually exists. It centres around C Peter Wagner. I like Randy Clark who uses Wagner Institute and I like Che Ahn little, he is said to support it and others. But the idea of stoning homosexuals to death is something I reject and show from scripture is not God's will. I hear that NAR wants literal stoning?
I find Randy is a caring positive man, and stoning sinners is not the kind of thing he supports.
NAR is said to support dominionism, that Christians should seem employment as rulers. That seems to be a good idea looking at what secular politicians are doing.
NAR seems to hold the idea that God restores offices lost in the dark days of persecution followed by the doctrines of demons era of church. Teacher, evangelist, preacher, prophet and apostles. That seems a good thing.
Does NAR exist, what is true and false, good and bad about it?
I find Randy is a caring positive man, and stoning sinners is not the kind of thing he supports.
NAR is said to support dominionism, that Christians should seem employment as rulers. That seems to be a good idea looking at what secular politicians are doing.
NAR seems to hold the idea that God restores offices lost in the dark days of persecution followed by the doctrines of demons era of church. Teacher, evangelist, preacher, prophet and apostles. That seems a good thing.
Does NAR exist, what is true and false, good and bad about it?