• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

But it was not a Choice...

WashedBytheSon

Active Member
Jul 2, 2007
183
9
MN
✟22,949.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I didn’t. You are mitigating child sexual abuse, the gang rape of children to justify your petty personal prejudices.


Lot offering of his daughters to be gang raped is as sick and morally degenerate as your defense of such things.


And now you are justifying rape. Again…you must be horribly desperate to justify hatred to stoop so low.



Interesting statement coming form someone using the bible to justify personal prejudice

Ignoring the multiple times this has been done…and what was you response to them? Oh yes…you chose to ignore them because they didn’t back up your prejudice.

I am not 'mitigating' child sexual abuse. Did I ever say that Lot offering his daughters was moral? NO. I DID say that he was affected by the wickedness of his neighbors, which is why he offered his daughters INSTEAD. I said that shows the vexation of spirit the towns were under. He was still more MORAL than the rest of the cities. God was the judge of that, so it MUST be true.

I'm not 'personally prejudiced' against anyone. You are the one who is prejudiced against God and God's word. After all you believe that God thinks rape is OK, which by the way those verses actually DON'T have anything to do with condoning rape, you just take them out of context to support your hatred of God.
 
Upvote 0
M

MrPirate

Guest
I am not 'mitigating' child sexual abuse.
You have taken time and effort to justify and excuse the rape of children.

Did I ever say that Lot offering his daughters was moral? NO. I DID say that he was affected by the wickedness of his neighbors, which is why he offered his daughters INSTEAD.
If the men of Sodom were homosexual why was Lot offering up his daughters?

I said that shows the vexation of spirit the towns were under. He was still more MORAL than the rest of the cities. God was the judge of that, so it MUST be true.
This is my point. Since God had no trouble with Lot promoting his daughter’s gang rape and God’s representatives, who were standing right there BTW, didn’t seem to think anything was wrong with having little girls be raped in the streets…then it stands to reason that the rape/sexual abuse of children is not immoral.

I'm not 'personally prejudiced' against anyone. You are the one who is prejudiced against God and God's word. After all you believe that God thinks rape is OK, which by the way those verses actually DON'T have anything to do with condoning rape, you just take them out of context to support your hatred of God.
wow you are desperate arn't you
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheManeki
Upvote 0

david_x

I So Hate Consequences!!!!
Dec 24, 2004
4,688
121
36
Indiana
✟28,939.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
If the men of Sodom were homosexual why was Lot offering up his daughters?

He didn't have any sons and he was being a good host.

This is my point. Since God had no trouble with Lot promoting his daughter’s gang rape and God’s representatives, who were standing right there BTW, didn’t seem to think anything was wrong with having little girls be raped in the streets…then it stands to reason that the rape/sexual abuse of children is not immoral.

In the tradition of the time he would sacrifice all he had to protect his guests. He was being selfless.
 
Upvote 0

WashedBytheSon

Active Member
Jul 2, 2007
183
9
MN
✟22,949.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
You have taken time and effort to justify and excuse the rape of children.


If the men of Sodom were homosexual why was Lot offering up his daughters?


This is my point. Since God had no trouble with Lot promoting his daughter’s gang rape and God’s representatives, who were standing right there BTW, didn’t seem to think anything was wrong with having little girls be raped in the streets…then it stands to reason that the rape/sexual abuse of children is not immoral.

wow you are desperate arn't you

No, I have not 'justified' the rape of anybody. I said Lot was more moral than the people of Sodom and Gomorrah but also still tainted by living next to them, meaning susceptible to doing immoral things thinking it would be the 'lesser' evil.

Lot didn't have any sons.

You must really have some grudge against God to think that He condones rape of any sort.
 
Upvote 0