- Jan 7, 2003
- 41,866
- 19,861
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Unitarian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
theHill said:“You know, I’ve been aligned with Marjorie and accused of believing a lot of the things that she believes in,” Boebert told conservative commentator Charlie Kirk at a Turning Point USA conference when asked about Greene’s support for McCarthy. “I don’t believe in this, just like I don’t believe in Russian space lasers — Jewish space lasers and all of this.”
No, she is calling out her outrageously ridiculous statements and alliances. There is no evidence at all that Greene is stupid, or that she actually believes all that she says in public.
Is Boebert calling Greene stupid?
It’s as if Congress has turned into Representative High (School) and the cool yet poor kids are after the rich popular kids! Tune in next week!No, she is calling out her outrageously ridiculous statements and alliances. There is no evidence at all that Greene is stupid, or that she actually believes all that she says in public.
Boebert is a far right wing politician. I strongly disagree with almost everything that she has done in politics. Greene is another type of politician entirely.
I have no allowable words to describe Greene and her allies.
Are you saying that either she’s stupid or a liar? I mean; that’s what it sounds like you are saying.There is no evidence at all that Greene is stupid, or that she actually believes all that she says in public.
imho, there's ample evidence that would suggest both (at the minimum).Are you saying that either she’s stupid or a liar? I mean; that’s what it sounds like you are saying.
We are in an age where each side defines its own facts.Are you saying that either she’s stupid or a liar? I mean; that’s what it sounds like you are saying.
Raskin will likely be kicked off the committee by the Speaker.....and Greene wants to be on the House Oversight Committee (committee's won't be announced until after the House leader vote occurs):
Picture this:
Jordan and Greene vs Jaimie Raskin (recently chosen to lead the minority on the committee).
Given her district, that seems a reasonable approach. Aren't a large percentage of Republicans "Q adjacent", supporting some conpsiracy theories?Boebert was chastened by her near defeat. She thinks backing down to merely Q adjacent is sufficient to look "moderate".
Each party nominates its members to standing committees, then there is a floor election. The Republicans could band together to refuse Raskin his assignment, but it would be purely spite and hyper-partisanship.Raskin will likely be kicked off the committee by the Speaker.
Are you suggesting that the voted against Green wasn't hyper-partisan. How many Republicans supported the actions.Each party nominates its members to standing committees, then there is a floor election. The Republicans could band together to refuse Raskin his assignment, but it would be purely spite and hyper-partisanship.
Greene was voted out of her assignments 230-199 for anti-Semitic remarks and for her support of violence against Democrats.
Eleven.Are you suggesting that the voted against Green wasn't hyper-partisan. How many Republicans supported the actions.
If you're saying those things in Public it proves your stupidity whether you agree with it or not.No, she is calling out her outrageously ridiculous statements and alliances. There is no evidence at all that Greene is stupid, or that she actually believes all that she says in public.
If you think that Greene is "stupid", I submit that you don't understand the meaning of the word. Ditto for Boebert.If you're saying those things in Public it proves your stupidity whether you agree with it or not.
I suspect that swearing at a fellow member is not the worst behavior that will occur in this Congress.They're still at it.
I don't know if I can link to it, but apparently Boebert swore at Marjorie after being told, "You need to stop" after the 14th vote for House Speaker. Boebert was one of the 20 Republican holdouts.
The NYPost headline from 1/8/2023 reads "Lauren Boebert accused of swearing at Marjorie Taylor Greene during House speaker vote" for the curious to google.
I could see the House not wanting Raskin on the Oversight Committee, after leading the effort to impeach Trump.Each party nominates its members to standing committees, then there is a floor election. The Republicans could band together to refuse Raskin his assignment, but it would be purely spite and hyper-partisanship.
1) Well I have seen very little from either of those two to suggest an admirable intelligence. Conversely, they have said many things I haven't found overly intelligent; some which I think could NOT be said by a reasonably intelligent person.If you think that Greene is "stupid", I submit that you don't understand the meaning of the word. Ditto for Boebert.
Apparently, I am "stupid" for disagreeing with your views. Such nonsense in common when discussing politics.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?