I understand that, but (without trying to be graphic) I've also heard many priests talk about how other "forms" of sex acts in marriage are okay as long as they aren't degrading....so does that essentially mean it's okay but then you have to [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] inside the wife? Sorry just trying to understand
As to which acts are okay and not, well, depends on who you ask, which priest/theologian. They all seem to have their own ideas to what is okay and not. But in any event, what ever the act, it must, it has to, no two ways about it, it has to end with [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] inside the wife. Period. The act as to be open to at least the possibility of life, even if you do not want it to happen... putting on a condom is not being open to at least that possibility. Not having sex when you are fertile, IMO only is not being open either but that is where the teaching goes much deeper. You are permitted to not get pregnant if for legitimate reasons you can't, you just can not do anything mechanical to the act itself to accomplish that.
People do not understand this but the sin of contraception and not being open to life is two fold. It is not one dimension. Its both/and the means we use and, together, it's the attitude, the belief that every act must be open if it were to happen, even if your very life is on the line. So even if you are infertile and can not conceive, you have to be open to accepting life if it were to happen. If you are fertile and use NFP and do all the right things physically, if you do them for the wrong reason, you are in sin to certain extent.
Upvote
0