• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Birth Control

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟59,834.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Isn't preventing conception going against God's word to be fruitful and multiply? Putting the chance of pregnancy in our own hand's rather than God's?
How so? "Being fruitful and multiply" was not accompanied with a number of children one must produce. Nor was the command be fruitful and multiply every time you come together. Further more that command was given to specifically to Adam and Eve in Genesis 1:28. As it was written "we" have full filled that verse.

Be fruitful and multiply is a verse that sanctifies those who can have children. It does not condemn those who do not, or can not.
 
Upvote 0

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟59,834.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Cannot is one thing, what about choosing not to by obstructing natural reproduction?


That is precisely why i said that the "Command" to be fruit full and multiply was not a command made to condemn those who were not doing so, it was permission for those who did.

If it were meant to be taken as a negative for those who were not having babies then there would be at least one mentioning somewhere else in scripture where contraception would be shown as a sin. What we do have in scripture is all manner of blessings for those who choose to have children. This reinforces the Idea that the "command" found in Gen 1 was God's blessing on this activity rather than a quota for all married couples to have children every time they came together. Or that every woman would be held accountable for every unfertilized egg she passed while being married.
 
Upvote 0

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟59,834.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You have to consider that birth control/use of contraceptives, was available in the time of Jesus, and some biblical scholars believe it to have existed long before. There were several methods used, they even employed "sheep skin." Even with this knowledge Jesus, Paul nor any of the other writers of the new testament said anything against these practices.
 
Upvote 0

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟59,834.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
Taking out of the equation that verse, what of couples who are purposefully preventing pregnancy with unnatural contraceptives? Birth control pills?
I for one don't see any distinction between so called natural family planning and using contraceptive devices. The goal and result is the same. Nowhere in scripture does it tie absolutely sex and procreation: Genesis 1 talks about blessing and procreation, but not sex. Genesis 2 talks about sex but not about procreation. We get to Genesis 4 before the two are mentioned together, and then it is simply as a statement of what happened "Now the man slept with his woman, Eve, she became pregnant,..."
 
Upvote 0

angrylittlefisherman

the worst of sinners
Jun 22, 2008
524
57
occidental ca
✟30,926.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Also many people feel that sex is for procreation however I was reading the songs Solomon and that seemed very recreational!!
If it were not enjoyable being fruitful and multiplying would probably not occur. I think that the intimacy and pleasure of intercourse probably has some direct correspondence with the unity of marriage. A marriage is made whole by consummation, it is the physical demonstration of becoming one flesh, this is one reason why fornication (and adultery) is so destructive to the soul. One must be careful to never make intercourse about recreation. I am not suggesting that that one cannot or should not enjoy or take some recreation from the act but to make about recreation is selfish.
As for birth control I do not like most forms of medical birth control, the pill etc as they all contain abortifacients, essentially the "birth control" pills and other pharmaceutical options will allow conception to occur but can still induce an abortion. So we do not use them.
 
Upvote 0

cowboysfan1970

Forum Regular
Aug 3, 2008
975
71
✟31,470.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Also many people feel that sex is for procreation however I was reading the songs Solomon and that seemed very recreational!!
People that feel that way will view the Song of Solomon as purely allegorical and putting a sexual meaning on it is perverse and worldly. The procreation only crowd more often that not bases their beliefs on personal feeling or convictions and won't or can't site Biblical passages to back it up. The ones that do site passages often either have a poor understanding of them or are twisting them to fit their beliefs, instead of the scriptures forming their beliefs.
 
Upvote 0

JCFantasy23

In a Kingdom by the Sea.
Jul 1, 2008
46,753
6,386
Lakeland, FL
✟509,627.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Cannot is one thing, what about choosing not to by obstructing natural reproduction?


If we were all meant to have children, I'd think we'd all be good parents. Or all of our bodies could handle it. :thumbsup: We're all created differently, and in different stages of our life it's not the best idea to have children. Sometimes even dangerous for the child or parent.
 
Upvote 0

chingchang

Newbie
Jul 17, 2008
2,038
101
New Braunfels, Texas
✟25,259.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Any sources you can cite?

BTW, I'm neutral on the subject I just think it's an interesting topic =]

One would have to prove that birth control IS as sin rather than proving it is not a sin since the scriptures make no mention of it. My belief is that God is omnipotent and if it is His will for someone to be born into this world...then no man-made birth control can stop it. BTW...last time I checked the world's population was over 6.6 BILLION:

Google - public data

...I'd say the Earth has been filled. Just sayin'...

Hugs,
CC
 
Upvote 0