Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
... when face with satans evolution lie, etc....
But Jesus answered him, saying, “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.’ ”
Creation was a supernatural event, a miracle. By definition miracles are outside of science, that is why they are called miracles.
Not to say certain parts cannot be looked at by science, but a true scientist guided by the Holy Spirit understands that some things are not testable but are to be taken on faith.
If you have to re-write God's word to make it acceptable to you, that should be a pretty good clue for you.
Too bad you do not follow the Messiah's example. Satan couldn't have managed to make evolution. Only God can create that way.
If you have to re-write God's word to make it acceptable to you, that should be a pretty good clue for you.
Too bad you do not follow the Messiah's example. Satan couldn't have managed to make evolution. Only God can create that way.
If i am rewriting the Bible
prove evolution from the Bible.
Maybe one should study why they differ. I find that suggestions such as "Matthew traces the legal line of Jesus, while Luke gives the biological line through Joseph." to be one of the best suggestions.It's easy enough; the two genealogies disagree with each other.
That's what adding new things to the Bible means. You're rewriting it to suit your own ideas.
Can you prove protons from the Bible? Why would you expect it to be a science book? It's about God and man and our relationship. That should be enough for you.
That is about as sorry of a defense of the evolution lie as the interpretation route you Bible evolutionist use.Can you prove protons from the Bible? Why would you expect it to be a science book? It's about God and man and our relationship. That should be enough for you.
Maybe one should study why they differ. I find that suggestions such as "Matthew traces the legal line of Jesus, while Luke gives the biological line through Joseph." to be one of the best suggestions.
From this link ( Jesus' Right to David's Throne by Dr. Arnold Fruchtenbaum. A messianic Bible Study ) a short writing on the geologies in Matthew and Luke by Arnold G. FruchtenbaumMaybe one should study why they differ. I find that suggestions such as "Matthew traces the legal line of Jesus, while Luke gives the biological line through Joseph." to be one of the best suggestions.
We cannot fail if our search involves more Bible Study in a exegesis manner.
prove evolution from the Bible.
While both Matthew and Luke give us the story of the birth of Jesus, they tell the story from two different perspectives; Matthew tells the story from Joseph's perspective, while Luke tells the story from Mary's perspective.
It doesn't say that. In fact, they both claim the same thing.
Exegesis is not a process of papering over problems with literal interpretations.
From this link ( Jesus' Right to David's Throne by Dr. Arnold Fruchtenbaum. A messianic Bible Study ) a short writing on the geologies in Matthew and Luke by Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum
Of the four Gospels, only two give us a genealogy, the same two that deal with the birth and early life of Jesus. Both Mark and John do not deal with the birth of Yeshua or His early life. Matthew and Luke do record those events, so it is natural that only these two would bother recording a genealogy. While both Matthew and Luke give us the story of the birth of Jesus, they tell the story from two different perspectives; Matthew tells the story from Joseph's perspective, while Luke tells the story from Mary's perspective. In Matthew, we are told what Joseph is thinking, what is going on in his mind; but we are told nothing of what Mary is thinking. We read of how angels appeared to Joseph, but there is no record of angels appearing to Mary. On the other hand, when we go to Luke's gospel, we see this same story told from Mary's perspective. In the Gospel of Luke, it is Mary who plays the active role while Joseph plays the passive role. We find the angels appearing to Mary, but no angels appearing to Joseph. We are told several times what goes on in the mind of Mary but we are never told anything about what Joseph is thinking. From this context, when we have these two genealogies and these two Gospels only, it should be very evident that since Matthew tells the story from Joseph's perspective, we have the genealogy of Joseph; whereas when Luke tells the story from Mary's perspective, we have the genealogy of Mary instead.
I've always thought of the Bible as recording God's word.
That is about as sorry of a defense of the evolution lie as the interpretation route you Bible evolutionist use.
What does exegesis mean exactly?
Exegesis is the exposition or explanation of a text based on a careful, objective analysis. The word exegesis literally means “to lead out of.” That means that the interpreter is led to his conclusions by following the text.
Nothing about "papering over problems"
To bad you do not follow The Messiahs example, when face with satans evolution lie, etc....
But Jesus answered him, saying, “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.’ ”
Another possibility....one belongs to Joseph and the other belongs to Mary.The genealogy in Luke doesn't match the one in Matthew. So either God got it wrong once, or these are not intended to be literal genealogies.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?