Bible-Creation-Evolution (2)

[TheReasoner]

And yet it is interesting that it was a rabbit that was used as an example of what would falsify the theory of evolution.

huh?

I must have missed that one. Another one of your 'falsifications' by which I mean nonsensical mental gymnastics akin to 'entropy falsifies evolution!!!!11!1!"

 

[Hespera]

Yea... That was my last reply to him. I'd hate to feed hia paranoia and make him act it out in a dangerous manner.

Good that you noticed that.

 

[mzungu]

And yet it is interesting that it was a rabbit that was used as an example of what would falsify the theory of evolution.

You talking about me bud? Cause I did no such thing!

 

[AV1611VET]

You talking about me bud? Cause I did no such thing!

No, sir! Not at all!

I was referring to what is called rabbits in the precambrian.

I just didn't respond to FG because of how he appended his post.

There are some things I just don't feel like dignifying with a response.

 

[AV1611VET]

​

 

[TheReasoner]

No, sir! Not at all!

I was referring to what is called rabbits in the precambrian.

I just didn't respond to FG because of how he appended his post.

There are some things I just don't feel like dignifying with a response.

Ah, why is that? Did I point out that your claims make no sense in a manner you dislike? Your claims are nonsensical. Please tell me why I should give them any more respect than I give claims of a flat, square world?

 

[AV1611VET]

Ah, why is that? Did I point out that your claims make no sense in a manner you dislike? Your claims are nonsensical. Please tell me why I should give them any more respect than I give claims of a flat, square world?

Makes no sense to whom? you?

Evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins said that the discovery of fossil mammals in Precambrian rocks would "completely blow evolution out of the water."

SOURCE

 

[sandwiches]

And yet it is interesting that it was a rabbit that was used as an example of what would falsify the theory of evolution.

Well, to be fair, dad's knowledge of reality does appear to be stuck in the Precambrian.

 

[AV1611VET]

Well, to be fair, dad's knowledge of reality does appear to be stuck in the Precambrian.

[sign]In my right to have an opinion:[/sign]
​

There is no such a thing as this 'precambrian' and 'postcambrian' and 'mesozoic' and whatever -- only on paper.

 

[sandwiches]

[sign]In my right to have an opinion:[/sign]
​

Everyone has the right to have a wrong opinion, AV.

There is no such a thing as this 'precambrian' and 'postcambrian' and 'mesozoic' and whatever -- only on paper.

I rather believe a single piece of paper backed by one solid piece of verifiable, demonstrable evidence than one thousand pieces of paper backed by thousands of ad hoc arguments, semantics games, special pleading, and other fallacious wind.

 

[mzungu]

[sign]In my right to have an opinion:[/sign]
​

There is no such a thing as this 'precambrian' and 'postcambrian' and 'mesozoic' and whatever -- only on paper.

I finally got you AV; It is not only on paper but on my screen . Also don't forget that Genesis is also only on paper!

 

[Nathan Poe]

Also don't forget that Genesis is also only on paper!

And before it was on paper, it was passed around by word-of-mouth.

 

[Delphiki]

[sign]In my right to have an opinion:[/sign]
​

There is no such a thing as this 'precambrian' and 'postcambrian' and 'mesozoic' and whatever -- only on paper.

Sigged for awesomeness.

 

[dad]

That's because there's no point in trying to teach someone who sticks their fingers in their ears and ignores what I say.

You obviously need to focus on learning here.

 

[rjc34]

Sigged for awesomeness.

Ah, beaten to the punch! Ah well, enjoy it. That there is pure gold.

 

[AV1611VET]

Ah, beaten to the punch! Ah well, enjoy it. That there is pure gold.

Here, don't be disappointed:

There is no such a thing as 'prehistoric' -- it's a concept made up by evolutionists.

 

[selfinflikted]

Here, don't be disappointed:

There is no such a thing as 'prehistoric' -- it's a concept made up by evolutionists.

Only if you ignore reality.

 

[AV1611VET]

Only if you ignore reality.

Really?

 

[selfinflikted]

Really?

Yes, AV. The evidence shows us that there was a long (really long) period of time before written recordings began. This is what we call "prehistoric."

Though, I know that you have your embedded age thing. I don't know why I even bothered to post, honestly.

 

[Nathan Poe]

Yes, AV. The evidence shows us that there was a long (really long) period of time before written recordings began. This is what we call "prehistoric."

Though, I know that you have your embedded age thing. I don't know why I even bothered to post, honestly.

Certainly not for AV's benefit, but to illustrate the perils and pitfalls of magical thinking to others.