Been told

[Frogster]

so how do you feel?

it is true, if this were live, and u did some of this stuff, acting like u answered, you would feel the pressure of the audience, because you are not behind a screen. dude, countless times, your post avoid things, while u raise new questions, to divert, it is just like a plate of spaghetti! Confusion, for diversion.

 

[Frogster]

thanks for reading the bible for us froster.

proves a point though, that you seek to avoid. Why didn't he say we are led by law? Or we wait under law, or we walk in law?

Aaaaaannnnnd kaboomski! it says fruit of the SPIRIT not LAW...

 

[Frogster]

explain this verse to me.

Galatians 5:18 ( NKJV ) 18But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law.

you explain! most Americans don't need to go to college to undertsand that one!

 

[from scratch]

explain this verse to me.

Galatians 5:18 ( NKJV ) 18But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law.

I would really love to but first you must come to terms with the word under. Then maybe we could graduate to the word not.

 

[JohnRabbit]

you explain! most Americans don't need to go to college to undertsand that one!

well, unfortunately i do, so, explain.

 

[JohnRabbit]

I would really love to but first you must come to terms with the word under. Then maybe we could graduate to the word not.

all you have to do is explain it to me. go with the "abc" technique so i'll be sure to get it.

 

[from scratch]

ok man, let's cut through it.

state my case for me.

What do you take me for?

 

[JohnRabbit]

What do you take me for?

???????????

 

[Frogster]

What do you take me for?

he does not want to dicuss galatian, so he is just going to do this stuff...

 

[JohnRabbit]

he does not want to dicuss galatian, so he is just going to do this stuff...

no explanation from you frogster? remember, i'm the one "lost".

 

[Frogster]

well, unfortunately i do, so, explain.

oh..see how u want to ask me this, but you do not want to ask about fruit of the spirit, and how it was not by law?

keep going, your mo is soooo clear.....

Why don't u want to finish that conversation? lol!

 

[from scratch]

the scripture was right there in the post!

here again:

Matthew 5:27-28 ( NKJV ) 27“You have heard that it was said £to those of old, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ 28But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

and another:

Matthew 5:21-22 ( NKJV ) 21“You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder, and whoever murders will be in danger of the judgment.’ 22But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment. And whoever says to his brother, ‘RacaRaca!’ shall be in danger of the council. But whoever says, ‘You fool!’ shall be in danger of hell fire.

He says when your're angry with your brother..., think about it.

Sure thing! Neither of these Scriptures state or imply that Jesus came to explaing the intent of the law. They do show changing the law though. In regards to your first verse I would ask when a thought becomes a sin? Is it your thought or one that has been placed there by the enemy of your soul. In the second case it is not even your thought - that is generated by you. You can take possession of that thought though and let it enter your heart.

The second citation you underlined and emphasized anger and seem to forget about without a cause.

While Jesus may have shown just a deeper meaning to the law, it doesn't show or prove that is Jesus' purpose for being on the planet.

 

[JohnRabbit]

a Shout Out To Frogster Or From Scratch:

Please Explain Gal 5:18 To Johnrabbit So He Can Understand It!

 

[JohnRabbit]

Sure thing! Neither of these Scriptures state or imply that Jesus came to explaing the intent of the law. They do show changing the law though. In regards to your first verse I would ask when a thought becomes a sin? Is it your thought or one that has been placed there by the enemy of your soul. In the second case it is not even your thought - that is generated by you. You can take possession of that thought though and let it enter your heart.

The second citation you underlined and emphasized anger and seem to forget about without a cause.

i'm sorry, the underline should have went there too.

 

[JohnRabbit]

oh..see how u want to ask me this, but you do not want to ask about fruit of the spirit, and how it was not by law?

keep going, your mo is soooo clear.....

Why don't u want to finish that conversation? lol!

you guys always want me to answer, so that you can chop my answers up.

but notice that i answer.

however, you won't answer anything i ask you.

so i'm asking you again, will you explain gal 5:18?

 

[from scratch]

answer one of my questions.

Isaiah 2:3 ( NKJV ) 3 Many people shall come and say,

“Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord,

To the house of the God of Jacob;

He will teach us His ways,

And we shall walk in His paths.”

For out of Zion shall go forth the law,

And the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.



what law will go forth from Zion?

Nothing in this post shows anything about the meaning you have been asked for. We want some definitions. Please provide them. You said we don't understand and ask for a definition and you refuse. Why?

 

[Heavens]

answer one of my questions.

Isaiah 2:3 ( NKJV ) 3 Many people shall come and say,

“Come, and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord,

To the house of the God of Jacob;

He will teach us His ways,

And we shall walk in His paths.”

For out of Zion shall go forth the law,

And the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.

what law will go forth from Zion?

This is the New Changed law that has been going forth from Zion/Jerusalem for 2000 years now;

(Heb 7:12) For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

(Rom 8:2) For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.

(Jas 1:25) But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.

Which has nothing to do with THIS old worthless law...

(Gal 3:21) Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.

Scratch and Frog and I are under the Law of an endless life. Not the siniatic law of carnal commandments;

(Heb 7:16) Who is made, not after the law of a carnal commandment, but after the power of an endless life.

(Heb 12:22) But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,
(Heb 12:23) To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,

The blind are still waiting for that law because they can't seem to shake being in bondage from the old law out of Sinai. Are you one of those Mr Rabbit?

PS, I notice you are altogether unable to state anything about why Jesus would keep that old widowed harlot "Jerusalem from beneath" old law around, while Jesus is enjoying His New Jerusalem Bride in His bedchamber. Why is that?

This is the third or fourth time I've put this forward. Would you care to comment?

 

[JohnRabbit]

Nothing in this post shows anything about the meaning you have been asked for. We want some definitions. Please provide them. You said we don't understand and ask for a definition and you refuse. Why?

bump what i'm saying.

you explain gal 5:18 to me.

 

[JohnRabbit]

This is the New Changed law that has been going forth from Zion/Jerusalem for 2000 years now;

(Heb 7:12) For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

(Rom 8:2) For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.

(Jas 1:25) But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.

Which has nothing to do with THIS old worthless law...

(Gal 3:21) Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.

Scratch and Frog and I are under the Law of an endless life. Not the siniatic law of carnal commandments;

(Heb 7:16) Who is made, not after the law of a carnal commandment, but after the power of an endless life.

(Heb 12:22) But ye are come unto mount Sion, and unto the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable company of angels,
(Heb 12:23) To the general assembly and church of the firstborn, which are written in heaven, and to God the Judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect,

The blind are still waiting for that law because they can't seem to shake being in bondage from the old law out of Sinai. Are you one of those Mr Rabbit?

PS, I notice you are altogether unable to state anything about why Jesus would keep that old widowed harlot "Jerusalem from beneath" old law around, while Jesus is enjoying His New Jerusalem Bride in His bedchamber. Why is that?

This is the third or fourth time I've put this forward. Would you care to comment?

and again, i really don't understand what you are talking about.

 

[from scratch]

well, i wish i was as good as you, at communicating, but it seems i'm not!

Well I'm sorry that you took it as a slam. I already in a prior post said that I consider that I have failed in communicating my idea and try again. Why won't you?