Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
We all know why you set up this thread.The article does not claim that all Muslims are terrorists. If you can find something in the article that isn't true I think that would be better than to demand that the thread be closed regardless of if it's the truth or not. And the same so-called "academics" get Catholicism wrong.
You are proving my point that the only way to argue against the article is to use the ad hominem. If I were "Islamophobic" would I have said that we should try to work with Iran to fight against ISIS? And would I have consistently defended Syria's President Assad?We all know why you set up this thread.
Do the decent thing and close it now...
You are proving my point that the only way to argue against the article is to use the ad hominem. If I were "Islamophobic" would I have said that we should try to work with Iran to fight against ISIS? And would I have consistently defended Syria's President Assad?
Because Iran and Syria's President Assad are Muslims. And if I were "Islamophobic" I'd be afraid of all Muslims, right?Why not..?
Fine. Let's say all that's true. The question still remains, what have they said that's wrong?
Because Iran and Syria's President Assad are Muslims. And if I were "Islamophobic" I'd be afraid of all Muslims, right?
Why would it be wrong to post a recipe, just because you disagree with the source?
What you've done is a very common tactic. It's commonly called "poisoning the well". You can't refute what they say, so you just demonize them and make them the bad guy so that the ignorant will not listen to them and judge for themselves.
But the fact remains that you cannot refute anything they've said.
What part of what is said in the article is hate? Can you provide an example?Not necessarily at all, as you well know.
Now do the right thing and close thise Muslim hating thread please...
How is Jihad Watch a hate site?
Pointing out that someone engages in a logical fallacy is not flaming.
I know. That's what I just said. You can't refute them so you demonize them, instead.
The way that my mind works is I need evidence for a claim that is given. If this thread gets closed just because of a claim of it being "hate" and without anything to back up that claim it will convince me even more that what is in the article is the truth. If the website's stated purpose was to convince people to kill or to hate Muslims, then I would agree that it is a hateful website. But I haven't seen any evidence of that.I didn't expect you to close it but just thought I'd try and make yu see how muslim hating threads like this have no place in OBOB...
The SPLC says they are a hate site.
The way that my mind works is I need evidence for a claim that is given. If this thread gets closed just because of a claim of it being "hate" and without anything to back up that claim it will convince me even more that what is in the article is the truth.
They are a left-wing partisan organization which also listed the conservative Family Research Council as a "hate group."The SPLC says they are a hate site.
The SPLC labels anyone who disagrees with them to be a hate site.
I'm part of three groups they've labeled hate groups and I can tell you from first hand experience that none of them have anything whatsoever to do with hate and that, in one of them, one of our officers is black and two are Hispanic. So, who they think we hate, I have no idea.
In any event, I came here through the "new posts" tab and didn't realize I was on the OBOB forum so I'm leaving, since I'm not Catholic.
Even though I've deleted my previous posts, I'll go and await my infraction for unwittingly stumbling into the wrong forum.
They are a left-wing partisan organization which also listed the conservative Family Research Council as a "hate group."
Instead of just criticizing the source of the article, got anything better? And BTW, what part of what LivingWordUnity posted is not true? Was there NOT a Battle of Badr? Do the Muslims NOT practice Taqiyya and is it NOT religious deception? (Seems to me that what was stated is very much like the left's "the ends justifies the means" and we KNOW that concept isn't very Christian.) And do the Muslims NOT practice the doctrine of Aborgation? Do they NOT practice Sharia Law? Stoning and "honor killing" is NOT part of it? Is Ramadan NOT a fast? Does Zakat exist? Is the pilgrimage that each Muslim is supposed to take to Mecca called Hajj? And since the news speaks of ISIS requiring Christians to pay Dhimmni (tax for being a non-Muslim), is the article WRONG concerning what Dhimmni is?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?