I think I may have worshipped Santa for a bit when I was a kid. But I gew out of it. I mean, for heaven's sake, Santa is for children! He's not evil, like Martin Luther, or Pope Pius IX. And he's made up! Oops, sorry I said that. Does the anti-Santa crowd prefer that we go back to the Puritan times, when Santa was pushed away, and instead children got to witness witch-hanging for a holiday treat? Goodness.
Yes, the commercial insanity of Christmas giving has reached new heights (I mean lows) these days. And here are the stark economies of it: retailers generally depend on Christmas sales to get them through their year. If they have a bad Christmas, they have a bad year. Retailers place orders through the manufacturers and wholesalers for Christmas in hopes of maximizing the profits. It seems the spirit of Christmas giving gets lost in the dutiful frenzy to buy, buy, buy.But Santa isn't made up. He's based on historical figures, like Saint Nicholas, who were very charitable and giving and gave out of a Christian heart and tradition. The stories behind the people who became the tradition of Santa are facinating.
Perhaps more people just have to remember the charitable and kind motives behind Santa and Christmas giving, rather than the "Stand in line for a video game console for six hours and fight when the store runs out" tradition that has developed over the past 20 years.
Santa is a western European tradition associated with St. Nicholas. And there are certainly options to teach children about the history of St. Nicholas as well, that focus on a more spiritual presentation of his legend.
While I'm somewhat impressed with the stories behind this St. Nicholas, I am much more impressed with the stories behind the saints in the Bible. You know, the ones who gave their lives for the furtherance of the Gospel.
Don't get me wrong. We certainly need more St. Nicholas' out there, and he was probably more of a giving man than I'll ever be, but when St. Nicholas overshadows Jesus Christ - (especially on His birthday) - I draw the line.
While I certainly agree that the materialism in the Christmas spirit has reached a point of bile overflow, I will have to disagree that focusing on Christian martyrdom is a good tradition to inundate children with on Christmas. I would rather my child sit on Santa's lap (which the little ones love), then say, hurl stones at an effigy of St. Stephen in rembrance of his stoning (I made that up).
I'm working from the premise that Santa was conjured up by a mindset of an entity that wanted to usurp God at one time, failed in his attempt, and now goes around either outright blaspheming Him, or supplanting Him in the minds of little children.
They say "anti-" meaans either "against" or "in place of".
The one antichrist (beast) is going to be against God.
The other (false prophet) is going to be like God.
On that same note, why not take back CHRISTmas by being more CHRISTlike.
Instead of making Christmas about gifts (I'm sorry, but it is), why not make it about giving to those that are actually in need? Why not de-commercialize it? Why not take a Christmas where your familly says, "Christmas has become about "what did you get for Christmas" and materialism, and generally giving each other things we want, rather than things that we need.
Except December 25th isn't the day Christ was born, as has been mentioned repeatedly. The fact that the Bible mentions that that shepards were out with their sheep when he was born should be enough of a clue in on that as no shepard (even those located in the middle east) would be out with their sheep in the winter. No one knows the exact date, but Christ was born sometime in the spring.While I'm somewhat impressed with the stories behind this St. Nicholas, I am much more impressed with the stories behind the saints in the Bible. You know, the ones who gave their lives for the furtherance of the Gospel.
Don't get me wrong. We certainly need more St. Nicholas' out there, and he was probably more of a giving man than I'll ever be, but when St. Nicholas overshadows Jesus Christ - (especially on His birthday) - I draw the line.
My proposition to all the Christians that are upset about the current state of this holiday is this...
I suppose it's never too early to polish up that persecution complex for some people. It would say so much more for Christians if they would simply shrug and continue wishing everyone a "Merry Christmas" even if someone wishes them "Happy Holidays."
I don't understand this at all. Except that my suggestion is at least half serious.This is some sort of attempt at an ironic joke, right?
You prefer Stalin to Santa, I gather.
Some people never lose a persecution complex.
At another forum I posted at you would have thought the da vinci code was the first sign of the apocalypse. That as they typed non-christians were out there forming armies getting ready to pull them out of their houses and throw them into concentration camps.
It was very pathetic.
Is this what evangelism has become in the computer age? Some guy with a digital Bible who uses the keyword search function?"Santa" is much more than just an anagram of "Satan".
Santa lives at the North Pole.
Santa goes --- HO HO HO!
Santa gives gifts.
- [bible]Zechariah 2:6[/bible]
Santa knows who's naughty and who's nice.
Santa is semi-omnipresent.
Santa is ageless.
- 6,000,000,000 / 24 hours / 60 minutes / 60 seconds = 69,444 persons per second.
Santa has coal for those who've been bad.
I submit that Santa Claus is more than just a cultural icon --- he's a divine wannabe that takes the place of Christ at Christmas time.
- [bible]Psalm 11:6[/bible]