• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Atheists debates - is it worth it?

2PhiloVoid

Critically Copernican
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,751
11,564
Space Mountain!
✟1,365,788.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
In other words those biblical stories about gods and talking snakes and talking bushes have no more credibility than the Dreamtime stories about the Rainbow Serpent.
You keep spurting out this same cyclic regurgitation. See an epistemological doctor!

Why would you doubt the veracity of the bible if gods physically showed up all the time? Or do you only believe in fantasies and not empirical evidence?
For starters, the statement attributed to Jesus offered by the writer of John's Gospel at John 1:18 indicates an epistemic starting point for us. Of course, if you think the writer is incorrect, then I'm going to assume you'll be consistent and say that you don't believe anything else he wrote in the rest of his gospel, correct? I'd hate to see an atheist backtrack and be inconsistent in his use and affirmation of biblical statements; we wouldn't want to have to surmise that an atheist, like yourself, is just trying to play both sides of the semantic and cognitive field when dealing with issues involving in our attempt to understand the biblical writings.

By the way, if you need a good primer on the rudiments of ancient Jewish cultural idiom which plays a part in the language of the New Testament, I'd suggest you check out the book by Lois Tverberg, Reading the Bible with Rabbi Jesus: How a Jewish Perspective Can Transform Your Understanding (2017).
 
Upvote 0

Mitty

Active Member
Mar 4, 2020
212
39
78
Victoria
✟27,312.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Which is why less than 10% ever bother to go to church now, and why more than 30% said they had no religious beliefs on the recent national census compared to 22% for the previous census

What kind of scientist were you?
Plant physiologist.

Why would I bother to do that, given that I'm familiar with the English language? And afterall one of my father's cousins was an Anglican Archbishop for Melbourne, although i understand his surviving children no longer believe.

But why did he want to be executed for sedition and claiming to have an inherited right to be the Jewish king, and why did he curse his god when he unsuccessfully appealed for help (Matt 27:46)?
 
Upvote 0

Mitty

Active Member
Mar 4, 2020
212
39
78
Victoria
✟27,312.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
So why should I believe the biblical stories about talking snakes and talking bushes or that the universe was created about 6000 years ago, given the unequivocal evidence that the universe is billions of years old?

And why do you just attack the messenger and not the message?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Critically Copernican
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,751
11,564
Space Mountain!
✟1,365,788.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Which is why less than 10% ever bother to go to church now, and why more than 30% said they had no religious beliefs on the recent national census compared to 22% for the previous census
Yes, I'm familiar with the stats, Mitty. But it's not my fault that a whole host of folks misinterpret and also misrepresent the biblical message in asserting that God is somehow a Genie-in-a-Bottle just ready to take our orders. It's not surprising that when people falsely form this expectation in their God-given brains that they're setting themselves up (and perhaps others) for massive disappointment. The truth of the matter is, though, that Jesus never said we could write blank checks on faith. When people interpret Jesus to have meant this kind of thing, that's just wishful thinking a a lack of the application of proper, more educated Hermeneutics.

Plant physiologist.
Well great. Come over and help me plant a garden then!

Why would I bother to do that, given that I'm familiar with the English language? And afterall one of my father's cousins was an Anglican Archbishop for Melbourne, although i understand his surviving children no longer believe.
This bit of response from you doesn't even make sense given what I said and to which you're attempting to respond here.

But why did he want to be executed for sedition and claiming to have an inherited right to be the Jewish king,
... what do the New Testament writers say? Surely you've read their work, right?

and why did he curse his god when he unsuccessfully appealed for help (Matt 27:46)?
With this kind of question, I'm beginning to wonder if you've actually read the New Testament yourself, or you're just picking out bits and pieces from some particular Skeptic's book. Obviously, Jesus never cursed God, His Father. But you know this already. And you know already how ancient Jews would cite their sacred scriptures, right?

Here's what you might do. You might read Matt 27:46 and ask yourself, where in the Old Testament might we find these exact words? And then, you might crack open that book by Lois Tverberg I just mentioned earlier.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Critically Copernican
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,751
11,564
Space Mountain!
✟1,365,788.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So why should I believe the biblical stories about talking snakes and talking bushes or that the universe was created about 6000 years ago, given the unequivocal evidence that the universe is billions of years old?
You don't. Who said you had to? I don't, and furthermore, I'm more or less a fan of the BioLogos group, although as a philosopher myself, I'm probably just a bit more liberal on the front where science and the bible meet than even those at BioLogos are.

And why do you just attack the messenger and not the message?
... because Your message is wrong, and I don't think you're being honest. But, see here! I'm not placing you on ignore because I have a policy of grace which prohibits me from doing that to anyone. But I will and often do counter atheistic smugness with sheer candor if the need arises, and in your case, the need is arising. Then again, you could chose to allow for education, and being that you're a former scientist, I'm under the impression that you value learning. Or am I wrong in your case?
 
Upvote 0

Mitty

Active Member
Mar 4, 2020
212
39
78
Victoria
✟27,312.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
That's your choice if you want to believe in talking snakes and talking bushes, or just use a cherry picker to ignore all the numerous biblical contradictions and inconsistencies and scientific untruths.

So how do you know that Jesus didn't curse his god when he was being executed for sedition and claiming to be the Jewish king as described in Matt 27:46 before the rotting corpses crawled out of their graves and wandered around down-town Jerusalem (Matt 27:52-53)?
And how do you know that Jesus even existed?
And either way, what relevance is it to the 21st century anyway?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Francis Drake

Returning adventurer.
Apr 14, 2013
4,002
2,518
✟200,265.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Independence-Party
The atheist's argument is not with you, but with the Holy Spirit. That's what Paul says in Romans1.

It is the Holy Spirit that convicts men of the creator God, not intellectual arguments for the existence of God. Despite all his arguments, the atheist is arguing against the God he knows to be true in his heart because God reveals himself to all men including that atheist!

That's why I don't waste time on them.

Romans1v18For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness,
To suppress truth, you must first possess it, so who gave it to them?

19because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them.
There it is, God gives every man sufficient truth to know him.

20For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse,
So the invisible God is made visible in every man's heart, leaving the choice of acceptance or rejection up to each man.
At the judgement, no excuses will hide a man's rejection of God.
 
Reactions: coffee4u
Upvote 0

Mitty

Active Member
Mar 4, 2020
212
39
78
Victoria
✟27,312.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
That's just your personal opinion and just another example of attacking the messenger and not the message.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Critically Copernican
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,751
11,564
Space Mountain!
✟1,365,788.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
That's your choice if you want to believe in talking snakes and talking bushes
... I didn't say I 'believe' in talking snakes, now did I? Of course, the writers of the bible didn't believe in that either, nor did they believe in talking bushes or talking donkeys. We both know from basic biology that these various organisms don't talk, now don't we? So, what are we ACTUALLY reading in the bible, with hermeneutics applied and contexts considered?

So how do you know that Jesus didn't curse his god when he was being executed for sedition and claiming to be the Jewish king as described in Matt 27?
Psalm 22, which is what Jesus was referring to on the cross in Matthew 27, wasn't a curse upon God. Of course, you knew this already, I'm guessing. If not, you better read that book by Lois Tverberg.

And how do you know that Jesus even existed?
I don't, but I'll take the reasoning of Bart Ehrman over that of Richard Carrier on this basic point ...

And either way, what relevance is it to the 21st century anyway?
.... oh, if anything, I'd surmise it has something to do with ... this!

 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Critically Copernican
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,751
11,564
Space Mountain!
✟1,365,788.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
That's just your personal opinion and just another example of attacking the messenger and not the message.

I like to attack both message AND messenger, when the circumstances necessitate it. Besides, sometimes criticism of a messenger is suiting and appropriate, especially if the the 'messaging' interlocutor is being belligerent and not really rational or sociable. And no, this ISN'T just my opinion.

Y'know, on one level, Massimo Piggluici agrees with me, or rather, I agree with him.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Mitty

Active Member
Mar 4, 2020
212
39
78
Victoria
✟27,312.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
In other words those biblical stories about gods are just imaginative fantasies with no more credibility than the Dreamtime stories about the Rainbow serpent.

Psalm 22, which is what Jesus was referring to on the cross in Matthew 27, wasn't a curse upon God. Of course, you knew this already, I'm guessing. If not, you better read that book by Lois Tverberg.
Which is just a plagiarism by the gospel writers of the stories about David who was his god's begotten son (Psalm 2:7) even though David was an adulterous murderer who said that Jonathon's love was more wonderful than with any of his wives and concubines (2Sam 1:26).


 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Critically Copernican
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,751
11,564
Space Mountain!
✟1,365,788.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
In other words those biblical stories about gods are just imaginative fantasies with no more credibility than the Dreamtime stories about the Rainbow serpent.
Perhaps, but a wise man said not so very long ago,"That's just your opinion!"

Whatever. I can see I'm going to go nowhere with you and your peanut gallery commentary ...

Best Wishes, then! Read that book by Lois Tverberg, if for no other reason than to see what another biologist might think about the nature of the writings of the Bible. Of course, you probably could also read something from Francis Collins for that as well.
 
Upvote 0

Mitty

Active Member
Mar 4, 2020
212
39
78
Victoria
✟27,312.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Perhaps, but a wise man said not so very long ago,"That's just your opinion!"

Whatever. I can see I'm going to go nowhere with you and your peanut gallery commentary ...
That's your choice if you don't want to be enlightened and believe that the bible is just a peanut gallery.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: LoG
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Critically Copernican
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,751
11,564
Space Mountain!
✟1,365,788.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Perhaps you could actually read the bible instead of those biblical apology books.

I'm not sure I understand this statement of yours ... it seems to beg for a special application of hermeneutics, especially if you were to be known to give a damn about the context of the person you're talking to. Obviously, you don't.
 
Upvote 0

Mitty

Active Member
Mar 4, 2020
212
39
78
Victoria
✟27,312.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I'm not sure I understand this statement of yours ... it seems to beg for a special application of hermeneutics, especially if you were to be known to give a damn about the context of the person you're talking to. Obviously, you don't.
Nope, it just means actually reading the bible and not exigesic hermeneutic apologies for all the numerous biblical contradictions and inconsistencies and scientific untruths.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BigV

Junior Member
Dec 27, 2007
1,093
267
48
USA, IL
✟49,404.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What????!! How do you 'know' this?

Not only is this 'anti-christ' speech, it's something I know you can't and haven't validated one way or another.

Are you seriously not getting it? Jesus in the Old Testament gives NO second chances to people working on a Saturday (See Numbers 15). And then, Jesus comes to this earth, meek and mild. Nobody punished for sins. Forgives adulteries, doesn't care about Sabbath observance, even changes his own dietary laws! And then, goes back up and boils with wrath?

So, where is the real Jesus?
 
Upvote 0

RBPerry

Christian Baby Boomer
Site Supporter
Oct 14, 2013
808
302
76
Northern California
✟111,732.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives

I'm afraid your not getting it. Jesus didn't create the Mosaic law, Moses did. God gave us the ten commandments. I truly understand the confusion between the old and new testament. The Gnostic Christians believed that the God of the old testament wasn't the same as the God of the new because they couldn't rationalize the differences.
As Christian we believe we are to love all people, when you look at what Jesus taught primarily the sermon on the mount, (Mathew 5) it is pretty hard to argue against his teachings.
Christianity hangs on one main issue, the empty grave, meaning the resurrection.
The bible is a collections of writings spanning over a 1500 year period by people that had little or no scientific knowledge or understanding compared to what we have today, so yes you are going to find scientific errors. The history of the Israeli people that is documented in the old testament does seem to allow slavery, genocide, and some pretty barbaric practices that I have difficulty reconciling within myself. I have seen genocide first hand My Lai, Vietnam and it is horrible to say the least.
The bible literalist will insist that the bible is without error, coming from a literal reading they are wrong in my opinion. We must remember who gave us the original cannon, the Catholic Church and I'm sure Constantine had his fingers in the creation of the new testament, at least the early versions. Then when we look at how the Catholic Church attempted to control people by distorting what Christ taught it is no wonder there are problematic areas.

What non believers can't understand is the personal relationship, if you are touched by the Holy Spirit you may walk away, but you will never deny the existence of God because you will have felt his existence. No one can give you that, only the Holy Spirit, and if you don't seek Him, he most likely won't bother you. Some people have been given a glimpse of existence beyond the grave, and most are forever changed and many have encounters with Jesus.
I suppose the only reason I waist my time on debates like this is I do deeply care about non believers because I was there at one time.
 
Upvote 0