franklin
Sexed up atheism = Pantheism
"Franklinlogic".
Which "law of logic" makes the assertion that you don't need to prove a negative assertion of belief.
Perhaps you need to do your homework and find out for yourself. Suppose I were to ask you to prove the nonexistence of invisible unicorns. As you can see, you can't prove a negative. BTW, it's not my logic. It's logic governed by reason. My atheism isn't based on belief there is no God. My atheism is the denial of the assumptions of theism. Gods, devils, ghosts, spirits, wizards and even those unicorns you keep hearing about that are all related to one another. They are all impossible entities invented in the minds of humans that are not part of objective reality, fact and truth. In short, you can't prove something that is not based on fact and reality. A negative isn't something provable objectively. So here's your homework assignment little boy. Look up the terms, logic, reason, objective, reality, fact, absolute, knowledge, perception and truth. Keep me posted when you learn something and are able to engage in a more logical discussion. Looks like you have your work cut out for you.
Last edited:
Upvote
0