Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Excuse me, Raithie, that's bologna.However, so far you have not brought anything to the table, other than stating that you don't need to defend your position.
There were no atavisms present when creation was finished.
And saying there were no atavisms is not the same thing as saying I don't need to defend my position.
If you're willing to explain to me how atavisms would fit in with your beliefs (why they're there etc.), I'm all ears.
Excuse me, Raithie, that's bologna.
Even science recognizes nothing as something; and I'll state this again:
There were no atavisms present when creation was finished.
And saying there were no atavisms is not the same thing as saying I don't need to defend my position.
I don't.Where do you fit them into your version of reality?
So now that I answer you honestly -- you reciprocate with this?Where do you fit them into your version of reality?
And you expect me to dignify this with an answer?How do those fit in with your alternate version of reality, AV?
Take the science inquisition elsewhere, please.
Why should it?Your version of reality doesn't acknowledge atavisms, AV.
I guarantee you, Tomatoman, I'm not the one who is looking ignorant here.You don't like being skewered do you?
I guarantee you, Tomatoman, I'm not the one who is looking ignorant here.
How would you explain it if your child displayed a prominent atavistic trait?
Why should it?
Any attempt to retrofit atavisms into the Creation Week should be denied by even a 5 year old.
Assuming these atavisms are what you guys are guessing they are, perhaps the gene pool was messed up by the fallen angels of Genesis 6 performing genetic engineering?Essentially the question is 'if animals are descended from special creations that evolution cannot change significantly, why do some animals occasionally display atavisms, which seem to indicate a complex evolutionary history.'
Assuming these atavisms are what you guys are guessing they are, perhaps the gene pool was messed up by the fallen angels of Genesis 6 performing genetic engineering?
I'd much rather stay within the confines of the Creation Week, since creationists were targeted in the OP.)
Ya -- and I'd like an auto mechanic to explain why currents drift clockwise in the N hemisphere and counterclockwise in the S hemisphere.The question has nothing to do with the story of creation. Regardless of whether atavisms did or did not occur during the Creation Week, they happen now, in the present day. The OP is asking creationists to explain them.
1.3 MILLION posts from the triangle since June 2006?
Wow!
-- thank you.
(And it's 1.3 from the rectangle --)
Yep, corrected it between post.
He did mean the Bermuda Triangle.I thought you maybe meant the Bermuda triangle...
He did mean the Bermuda Triangle.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?