A point that is central to this conversation and seems to be something you are perhaps predicating your argument on is: that which is popular is valid.
I do not agree with the 'majority are right' view, or the 'everyone is doing it so it must be good/right' view.
That which is popular is popular, nothing else.
Tynan,
Neither do I agree with the 'majority are right' view, it is not my argument the that which is popular is valid. For if this were the case, then in the 1st Century I would have a very difficult time validating my own beliefs as the fledgling Christian Church was very much in the minority.
The point I am trying to make is that the preponderance of evidence would suggest that there is a supreme being, as this, for some reason, is a very natural instinct for human beings. I would argue that even atheists feel this natural instinct and put this 'faith' into what ever it is that satisfies this need, be it science, family, or one's self.
For I do not believe that a true atheist actually exists, one may convince themselves and others that they do not believe in a god, but they do place something in the god role. That is my argument.
Did the Christian god (the one I persume you follow) ingrain on the people of central African the natural desire to sarfice children to the ocean to stop the tides ?
Why did he not just make himself visible, why the child sacrifice ?
Or did he just ingrain his wishes a little poorly ?
But how could he ? He is omnipotent, he is omniscient, he is omnipresent, he must have engrained perfectly, he must have engrained clearly and with exacting purpose, he must have wanted the children wrapped in cane leaves an drowned.
Good questions. As a Catholic I believe that God has made himself visible through his creation and that whatever truth exists in the plethora of religions, it is the truth of this one God. How human beings interpret this divine being varies on time, culture or location.
God, for whatever reason, chose to reveal Himself fully and completely in Jesus Christ, He chose the Jewish people to bring this revelation to is completion.
So, did God advocate human sacrifice for the Mayans? No, but God was there, revealed imperfectly, and interpreted incorrectly, but He was there. This of course is my belief and has no bearing on the OP or our conversation.
PAX