• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Ask a physicist anything. (7)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Dinner time?

The animal kingdom is brilliant and quite scary too. The BBC has a brilliant range of TV shows recently on them (Frozen Planet, The Great Barrier Reef and Earthflight).
I'm watching the Great Barrier Reef as we speak! Spooky :thumbsup:.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
What are the methodes used in order to date uncovered traces of ancient towns?
Human settlements are good in that they're unlikely to be older than 50,000-70,000 years, which means we can use good old-fashioned carbon dating. Calibration has to be performed as [sup]14[/sup]C levels are not constant - things which are 6000 years old are carbon-dated as 7000 years old, if uncalibrated.

Interestingly, radiocarbon dating hits a problem for things from between 400 and 800 BCE - we can't be more accurate that that. So, if something was made in 600 BCE, radiocarbon dating will only be able to say that it's true date is 800-400 BCE.
 
Upvote 0

acropolis

so rad
Jan 29, 2008
3,676
277
✟27,793.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Classic victim mentality. Blame every one else.

So scientists shouldn’t take any responsibility for the state of the world today?

Are scientists unwilling or just unable to make the world a better place.

Scientists are one of the few groups of people working to make the world a better place, they just don't have the power to do much. It's the politicians and generals and religious zealots that work tirelessly to drag with the world into more chaos and suffering.
 
Upvote 0

Chalnoth

Senior Contributor
Aug 14, 2006
11,361
384
Italy
✟36,153.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
How is it that when I turn on the water facet at home, there's pressure that shoots it all out.

Does this pressure come locally or is it from the water company?

Sorry for the dumb question this time. :)
It's a combination. There are pumps spread throughout the water system that keep the pressure high enough that the water comes out. Friction in the lines means that you have to have pumps in different places, and if you live in a larger building, they will have to have pumps on the higher floors to keep the water flowing. Pumps are also obviously used to push the water uphill.
 
Upvote 0

acropolis

so rad
Jan 29, 2008
3,676
277
✟27,793.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Well, that's one way. It's not universally used.

Certainly not. I'm curious why water towers wouldn't be used, however, since it seems like an elegant way to provide an even pressure even in the case of temporary power outages. The only city I've lived in that didn't use water towers had naturally occurring hills throughout the area, so they just built massive tank on those hills.
 
Upvote 0

Chalnoth

Senior Contributor
Aug 14, 2006
11,361
384
Italy
✟36,153.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Certainly not. I'm curious why water towers wouldn't be used, however, since it seems like an elegant way to provide an even pressure even in the case of temporary power outages. The only city I've lived in that didn't use water towers had naturally occurring hills throughout the area, so they just built massive tank on those hills.
My guess would simply be space requirements. But yes, elevated tanks are quite efficient forms of energy storage, allowing the water company to only pump water into the tanks when it's cheapest.
 
Upvote 0

Zippy the Wonderslug

Well-Known Member
Jun 6, 2015
622
6
55
✟927.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
I once was watching a pastor on TV trying to explain the concept of time.

He did something weird.

He took the size of the universe and divided it by it's age and came up with 365, the same number of days we have in a year.

Anyone have a guess as to what theory this might be or was it most likely his own personal take on time?
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I once was watching a pastor on TV trying to explain the concept of time.

He did something weird.

He took the size of the universe and divided it by it's age and came up with 365, the same number of days we have in a year.

Anyone have a guess as to what theory this might be or was it most likely his own personal take on time?
It sounds like dodgy mathematics to me. What where his units? I can divide my weight by my height and get any number I want - provided I choose the correct units.

Moreover, there's the rather glaring flaw that we don't actually know how big the universe is. There is an observable horizon beyond which we can't see, because anything beyond that is too far away for its light to have reached us. I'd be interested in what figure he used for the size of the universe, as that would be another flaw in his argument right there.
 
Upvote 0

Zippy the Wonderslug

Well-Known Member
Jun 6, 2015
622
6
55
✟927.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
It was something I saw like 10 years ago.

He was trying to explain the 6,000 years, historical account in the Bible.

His main point was on the perspective of the author.

So 6,000 years could be several billion depending on where you're observing Earth's history.

He said something like one could send out a constant beep, beep, beep signal.

When planet Y receives the first beep, it could be a 100 years before they heard the next one.

Other than that, I don't remember much, he was a little hard to follow. Sorry.
 
Upvote 0

Chalnoth

Senior Contributor
Aug 14, 2006
11,361
384
Italy
✟36,153.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I think I found something on this.

Age of the Universe

I'll have to read it later since that page is a little too intensive for my tablet.

Can you poke any holes to this theory?
"The world may be young and old simultaneously" is just a bad use of language. Either it's young, or it's old, or you've redefined young to mean old in which case your statement as lost all meaning.

As the rest just seems like an exercise in talking about what people thought some thousand years ago or so, I just don't see the point in bothering with it. What people talked about back then is completely irrelevant to the nature of reality. The world simply doesn't care what we humans talk about.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.