• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Ask a physicist anything. (6)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Davian

fallible
May 30, 2011
14,100
1,181
West Coast of Canada
✟46,103.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

chris4243

Advocate of Truth
Mar 6, 2011
2,230
57
✟2,738.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I don't think this exactly falls under Physics, but what exactly is Cold Fusion and why does it only work theoreticaly? I have a general understanding, I just wanted some clarification.

As far as I understand, it doesn't work theoretically, and only "worked" experimentally for a couple of guys. Either they made some mistake, or made up a story. Atoms need a lot of energy input to move close enough to fuse.

Wait, what? This has to be different from nuclear energy we use?

To add to what Wiccan_child said, the fusion process results in light atoms that are not radioactive, though depending on your starting materials you probably get a lot of neutrons emitted, which could make your fusion contraption itself radioactive. But in theory you can capture the neutrons on certain kinds of material to get something that is not radioactive and potentially beneficial.

As for nuclear fission, it splits heavy elements into lighter atoms. The number of neutrons a stable isotope has increases as the atom gets heavier, and so the heavy atoms split into smaller atoms which contain a large excess of neutrons, and are therefore radioactive. Furthermore, the split is not any specific split but it could break into many different kinds of fragments. Add to that the number of intermediates produced by the chain of decay, and you get so many different isotopes of so many elements that it's a real mess and you can't really isolate them. Even so, nuclear power plants produce less nuclear material than coal power plants release, due to the small quantity of radioactive stuff in coal ash and the large amount of coal burnt per unit of energy. But that's OK, we can use it to make construction materials.
 
Upvote 0

chris4243

Advocate of Truth
Mar 6, 2011
2,230
57
✟2,738.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Depleted uranium is denser than lead, and I've also heard that it's self-sharpening. As such it makes a great armor piercing projectile. Uranium can also burn into uranium oxide under certain conditions. Breathing any kind of dust is bad for you, and being in an enclosed area such as an armored vehicle means you get to breathe any dust or smoke produced there. Plus, as a heavy metal uranium is toxic and has no decent mechanism for removal from the body. As I understand it, any radioactivity it might have is nothing compared to the chemical toxicity.
 
Upvote 0

Naraoia

Apprentice Biologist
Sep 30, 2007
6,682
313
On edge
Visit site
✟23,498.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
According to evolution, at any time, did atom2adam evolution pass through a vermiform stage?
Yes.

Pretty much everything between this and these could be called "vermiform", if that means long, generally sausage-shaped animals.

Now my question: why do you ask?
 
Upvote 0

Chalnoth

Senior Contributor
Aug 14, 2006
11,361
384
Italy
✟36,153.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
So the universe could be a branch of mathematics?
Well, in a sense, I suppose.

Basically, mathematics is about the development and investigation of self-consistent symbolic structures. That is, mathematics is a set of descriptions of these self-consistent entities which we describe through the use of a set of symbols of some sort or other.

And it seems very likely that our own universe is one particular self-consistent structure, because a universe that isn't self-consistent would be nonsensical. Therefore, our universe very likely is a mathematical structure. We don't yet know which one, and we may never know. But we'll see.
 
Upvote 0

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Approximately how much physical resistance does the average human body have with weight placed against it?

Like how many pounds of weight would it take to completely squish a person?

Thanks! :)

I've been inside the ram of a punch press that could reduce any one of us to a puddle and a little white powder. (Except I was in the crush zone while it was coming down, defying every safety protocol :help:

So the answer is, less than 550 tons.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,597
52,508
Guam
✟5,127,478.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Chalnoth

Senior Contributor
Aug 14, 2006
11,361
384
Italy
✟36,153.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

chris4243

Advocate of Truth
Mar 6, 2011
2,230
57
✟2,738.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
So what is going on with the neutrinos at CERN?

News from The Associated Press
Neutrinos work in very strange ways. Either the discovery of the century or some large error is hidden. Personally, would prefer it the speed of light could be violated, makes life a bit more interesting ^_^

I agree that it would be the discovery of the century if confirmed, and it would be really exciting to shake things up. However, I don't believe it -- it almost has to be a mistake.

On a different note, "neutrino beam"? I'm pretty sure neutrinos don't get put into a beam.
 
Upvote 0

chris4243

Advocate of Truth
Mar 6, 2011
2,230
57
✟2,738.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
ftl-00.gif
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.