• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Ask a physicist anything. (3)

Status
Not open for further replies.

corvus_corax

Naclist Hierophant and Prophet
Jan 19, 2005
5,588
333
Oregon
✟29,911.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Wiccan Child, TSI, AV- Hey guys, thankee. I emailed her today and (very nicely I hoped) reminded her of our conversation, in addition to the statements made here (no, I didn't mention CF specifically) Apparently, and I'm not going to go into any specifics, she was having a multiple case of a bad day, and just kind of (and I quote) lost it. She admitted that I was correct, apologized for her rudeness, and then asked in her email if I had ever thought about taking a teaching position (she is aware of my background as a technical trainer and eventual training manager at Sykes Enterprises), to which I (hopefully) kindly said that that will never likely happen. So yay! (and for some reason, CF is not formatting correctly right now, so forgive my lack of paragraphs)
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,435
52,722
Guam
✟5,182,747.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Wiccan Child, TSI, AV- Hey guys, thankee. I emailed her today and (very nicely I hoped) reminded her of our conversation, in addition to the statements made here (no, I didn't mention CF specifically) Apparently, and I'm not going to go into any specifics, she was having a multiple case of a bad day, and just kind of (and I quote) lost it. She admitted that I was correct, apologized for her rudeness, and then asked in her email if I had ever thought about taking a teaching position (she is aware of my background as a technical trainer and eventual training manager at Sykes Enterprises), to which I (hopefully) kindly said that that will never likely happen. So yay! (and for some reason, CF is not formatting correctly right now, so forgive my lack of paragraphs)
Who in the world are you talking about?
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
To say that blacks and Asians are racial groups, don't we have to define race first of all? 'We know it when we see it' doesn't really cut it in science I imagine.
Arguably, a race is a distinct sub-group of human. I'm tempted to say 'breed' or 'sub-species', but they have horrible overtones. For example, white people are arguably a different breed to black people, given that there are distinct racial characteristics. Obviously it's not a perfect split, since people actually exist in a spectrum from whiter-than-white to blacker-than-black. But, like I said, discrimination would only be possible if there were characteristics people could discriminate against.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Wiccan Child, TSI, AV- Hey guys, thankee. I emailed her today and (very nicely I hoped) reminded her of our conversation, in addition to the statements made here (no, I didn't mention CF specifically) Apparently, and I'm not going to go into any specifics, she was having a multiple case of a bad day, and just kind of (and I quote) lost it. She admitted that I was correct, apologized for her rudeness, and then asked in her email if I had ever thought about taking a teaching position (she is aware of my background as a technical trainer and eventual training manager at Sykes Enterprises), to which I (hopefully) kindly said that that will never likely happen. So yay! (and for some reason, CF is not formatting correctly right now, so forgive my lack of paragraphs)
Yay! For some reason I imagined your conversation with her happened years ago, so you emailed a lil' old lady ^_^
 
Upvote 0

corvus_corax

Naclist Hierophant and Prophet
Jan 19, 2005
5,588
333
Oregon
✟29,911.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
But why doesn't it thunder and lightning during a winter blizzard?
I've seen that happen. I called in dead because I thought it was the end of the world. I mean seriously, even in the biblical hail and fire events, thunder and lightning was never described during a snowstorm. Im pretty sure they would have written than messed up stuff into their scrolls. (yeah yeah yeah, hail fire got nothing on something like this :D )
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Stupid, stupid question.

But why doesn't it thunder and lightning during a winter blizzard?
Hmm, good question actually. I suspect it's because the severe cold that causes a blizzard doesn't make for lightening, since lightning requires cool (but liquid) water to interact with ice crystals to generate the static charge. So, in a blizzard, too much water vapour crystallises into ice instead of water drops, so not enough charge is built up.

That said, you can get blizzards that are lucky enough to be able to generate a charge, called thundersnow.
 
Upvote 0

corvus_corax

Naclist Hierophant and Prophet
Jan 19, 2005
5,588
333
Oregon
✟29,911.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
That said, you can get blizzards that are lucky enough to be able to generate a charge, called thundersnow.
And it seriously messes with your reality when you see it :S More so than purple/violet lightning. Seriously. Just wow :S
 
Upvote 0

corvus_corax

Naclist Hierophant and Prophet
Jan 19, 2005
5,588
333
Oregon
✟29,911.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Yay! For some reason I imagined your conversation with her happened years ago, so you emailed a lil' old lady ^_^
Nah, she's in her 50's or so, happened a few months ago during the school year. Granted she is a 5th grade teacher, but you'd think she would have immediately understood the symmetry of a simple equation (although, see above she did apologize).
 
Upvote 0

Maxwell511

Contributor
Jun 12, 2005
6,073
260
42
Utah County
✟31,130.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Well, race may be hard to define, but there's no denying that it has some basis. After all, we can tell whether someone is black, white, Asian, Caucasian, etc, to a degree.

Just because something has a basis does not mean it correspond to a physical reality. The Caloric theory has a basis it is still made up nonsense.

Racial segregation wouldn't be possible if there weren't real characteristics by which people could be segregated.
Of course racial segregation is possible. But that is because there are almost infinite possibilities of defining race. Personally I want to define race on the colour of facial hair and marriage should be only between people of the same facial hair colour*.

I'm not saying it's right, or that it's even relevant in the modern world, just that we can't deny the existence of something for fear of the Political Correctness police.
My view is not PC. The PC view would be something like "Derp people should have the same should have the same rights as anyone else". My view is "Derp people don't exist".

*Obviously we might have a problem here since women tend not to have facial hair but I would assume that evolution would take care of that eventually.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Just because something has a basis does not mean it correspond to a physical reality. The Caloric theory has a basis it is still made up nonsense.
The theory behind it may be nonsense, but the thing it tried to explain is still real. Heat and heat flow are real phenomena. Likewise, though the rationale for racial segregation has illogical, race itself exists, in a broad sense. There genuinely are groups of people with a consistently lighter skin colour than other groups. If I go to Africa, I daresay I'll see more black people than I currently do.

Of course racial segregation is possible. But that is because there are almost infinite possibilities of defining race. Personally I want to define race on the colour of facial hair and marriage should be only between people of the same facial hair colour*.
You're free to do so, but race is not typically defined as such.

My view is not PC. The PC view would be something like "Derp people should have the same should have the same rights as anyone else". My view is "Derp people don't exist".
"Derp people should have the same should have the same rights as anyone else"? Eh?

*Obviously we might have a problem here since women tend not to have facial hair but I would assume that evolution would take care of that eventually.
Or you could just go gay. I know a stunning bloke if you're interested.
 
Upvote 0

Maxwell511

Contributor
Jun 12, 2005
6,073
260
42
Utah County
✟31,130.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
The theory behind it may be nonsense, but the thing it tried to explain is still real. Heat and heat flow are real phenomena. Likewise, though the rationale for racial segregation has illogical, race itself exists, in a broad sense. There genuinely are groups of people with a consistently lighter skin colour than other groups. If I go to Africa, I daresay I'll see more black people than I currently do.

I daresay you will. I am just curious about why you would think that skin colour is an appropriate way to group people.

"Derp people should have the same should have the same rights as anyone else"? Eh?

I'm going to say Derp.

Or you could just go gay. I know a stunning bloke if you're interested.

I have a natural attraction to boobs so I need to ask how fat he is before I show interest.:)
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I daresay you will. I am just curious about why you would think that skin colour is an appropriate way to group people.
Unless I'm very much mistaken, I never said it was appropriate, merely that it can be, and is, done. I know of several ways to commit suicide painlessly, but that doesn't mean it's polite dinner conversation.

I have a natural attraction to boobs so I need to ask how fat he is before I show interest.:)
Don't be so close-minded you homophobic bigot! God! Jeez! Kuh, pfft! :p
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.