• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Ask a Christian philosopher a question

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
You are imbuing an incorrect meaning to the word "assumption." To assume something, is to accept it as true or reality, it is a positive response. The question then becomes, how do we determine our assumptions are true, or not. Reality is "real" whether you believe it to be so or not and your beliefs have nothing to do with it. It's a fact you can't prove you're not part of the Matrix, but you assume/believe that you're not, as do I. Again, belief has nothing to do with this fact, and since we're unable to demonstrate we're not part of the Matrix, we have to begin with the assumption that we're not. Next step, compile evidence. The part you're chronically having trouble with is, determining which assumptions/beliefs are "real." What you have engaged in is picking the reality that best fits your beliefs, then have selectively ignored all evidence contrary to you preconceived "truths."
 
Upvote 0

Chriliman

Everything I need to be joyful is right here
May 22, 2015
5,895
569
✟173,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

I understand you think believing something is the same as assuming something. I simply disagree.

When I say I believe something, I'm confident that what I'm claiming to believe is actually true because I have sound reason to believe it. When I say I assume something, I'm not confident that what I'm claiming to assume is actually true because I admit my reasoning may not be completely sound, that's why it's an assumption, it's open to being wrong.

We claim beliefs when we are certain of our reasoning about a truth. We claim assumptions when we have good reasoning, but we could be wrong about a truth.
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
There's zero reason to not have confidence in one's assumptions if they're based on sound reason. This is why you're confused. You simply don't understand what an "assumption," is.
 
Upvote 0

Chriliman

Everything I need to be joyful is right here
May 22, 2015
5,895
569
✟173,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
There's zero reason to not have confidence in one's assumptions if they're based on sound reason. This is why you're confused. You simply don't understand what an "assumption," is.

I understand it's different than a belief and that's the point I'm trying to make.
 
Upvote 0

Aelred of Rievaulx

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2015
1,399
606
✟19,731.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
So you don't think it was a story? You think it actually happened? The bible contains a lot of stories which didn't actually happen and you're naive to think that they all did happen.
 
Upvote 0

Chriliman

Everything I need to be joyful is right here
May 22, 2015
5,895
569
✟173,201.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
But your point is a strawman. I'm truly baffled how you can't understand this.

Let me ask you this, do you believe "assumptions" are the same as "beliefs" or do you assume "assumptions" are the same as "beliefs"?

I claim to know "assumptions" are different than "beliefs" and I have sound reason for this claim.

I also know that when I became self-aware I was unable to make assumptions and had to subconsciously accept the truth that reality is real. Subconsciously accepting the existence of reality is not the same as assuming reality exists, therefore, my reasoning is not based on assumptions, but rather based on the subconscious acceptance of the truth that reality exists.

I understand this contradicts what atheists normally claim, which is that all beliefs(acceptance that something exists) are provisional because they rely on provisional assumptions, but this simply is not true considering we all subconsciously accept that reality exists when we become self-aware, thus this acceptance comes before any assumptions are made.
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Can you prove you're not in the Matrix?
 
Upvote 0

anonymous person

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2015
3,326
507
40
✟75,394.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
So you don't think it was a story? You think it actually happened? The bible contains a lot of stories which didn't actually happen and you're naive to think that they all did happen.

The Bible is a collection of different types of literature. This is a fact.

Parables, allegory, didactic passages, prose, poetry, historical records, epistles, ancient biographies, apocalyptic literature, prophesies, and so on and so forth.

Whether or not we interpret something recorded in scripture as actually having happened depends on the context in which the author provides it. Obviously I do not think the events described in Jesus' parables took place, for they are parables, for example.

The event in question recorded in Numbers is not to be taken metaphorically or figuratively. It is recorded as an historical event which the author intends for his readers to view as something actually having taken place. I have good reasons to think it actually took place and therefore, I believe God actually caused a voice to come from the mouth of the donkey on which Balaam was riding. I believe God created the universe and all therein ex nihilo. Him causing a voice to come from a donkey would have been well within His power.
 
Upvote 0

HitchSlap

PROUDLY PRIMATE
Aug 6, 2012
14,723
5,468
✟288,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I believe God actually caused a voice to come from the mouth of the donkey on which Balaam was riding. I believe God created the universe and all therein ex nihilo. Him causing a voice to come from a donkey would have been well within His power.
Totally.
 
Upvote 0

Aelred of Rievaulx

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2015
1,399
606
✟19,731.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Whether it's within God's power to do so is irrelevant. It is a story that serves a particular motif, most serious scholars wouldn't take it literally.
 
Upvote 0

anonymous person

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2015
3,326
507
40
✟75,394.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Whether it's within God's power to do so is irrelevant. It is a story that serves a particular motif, most serious scholars wouldn't take it literally.

I agree. It serves a particular motif. I see no reason to conclude from this however, that it never happened.

I never approached the Numbers account of the speaking donkey as a fictitious story just serving a particular motif.

After reading it, I did not come to the conclusion that it was just a fictitious story serving a particular motif. Nothing in the passage and the context within which it is found led me to conclude this.

The context led me to conclude that it was an historical account of something that happened. Peter alludes to it, and confirms it being something that actually happened.
 
Reactions: oi_antz
Upvote 0

Aelred of Rievaulx

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2015
1,399
606
✟19,731.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Because Peter would know? He's studied history, right?
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
If a story looks mythological it probably was intended to be read that way. Why don't you consider mythology an intended genre, why consider it an accidental (at best) or malicious (at worse)?


Whoa...where did you get the idea I don't consider myth an intended genre? Was it something I said?
 
Upvote 0

Aelred of Rievaulx

Well-Known Member
Nov 11, 2015
1,399
606
✟19,731.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Whoa...where did you get the idea I don't consider myth an intended genre? Was it something I said?
I misread this sentence: "If they never intended their myths to be read as literal history but allegory instead...then no they weren't liars."
Apologies, disregard my comment!
 
Reactions: oi_antz
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

I just realized when I originally wrote this post I lost your quote. Here it is again...

"This extraordinary evidence is ourselves(Which as I noted above is completely removed by atheistic scientists who are only focused on observable reality). The fact that we exist in the way that we do, is extraordinary evidence for the existence of God."


You said this...and unsurprisingly, you failed to mention what you meant by "the fact that we exist in the way we do". So...what did you mean by that? What is the "way that we exist" that is so extraordinary to you?

I've seen a lot of atheists discuss human anatomy and all of its myriad flaws in conversations with christians who believe in intelligent design....so it's certainly not as if "atheists" or "scientists" haven't considered mankind and the possibility that a god has created us. The evidence would seem to favor the view that we evolved and weren't miraculously created by something "intelligent". Somehow though, I don't think this is what you were referring to when you wrote about "the fact that we exist in the way we do".

So what do you mean?
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I misread this sentence: "If they never intended their myths to be read as literal history but allegory instead...then no they weren't liars."
Apologies, disregard my comment!

No apologies necessary...easy mistake to make. I sometimes write in a confusing manner.
 
Upvote 0

anonymous person

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2015
3,326
507
40
✟75,394.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship

I agree with what you said. The church has pushed for me to buy into or accept a particular narrative or view of reality.

I agree with that statement.
 
Reactions: oi_antz
Upvote 0