Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
so science still didnt proved that the earth isnt flat?
If there are actual UFOs then design of one kind of another is pretty much the only option.
You believe in God - you don’t believe he is capable of an incredibly imaginative and mind boggling-ly complex act of creation?
so a motor doesnt need design?You assume that all motors or motor-like things are the product of design in order to claim that they can't evolve naturally. Then you use this to justify your conclusion that all motors or motor-like things are the product of design.
Circular logic.
We're tetrapods, aren't we?No, some apes speak, some dont.
Some mammals have hands, some dont.
If your definition of "motor" includes objects found in nature which are not human productions then you have not shown that they need design. Just because they resemble human products in function is not evidence of design.so a motor doesnt need design?
now im a bit confuse since you said before that: "There isn’t any way to demonstrate or prove design"
so we can prove design or not?
On the other hand, if all we know about "flying saucers" is seeing them fly overhead (which is the context of Xianghua's thought experiment) we cannot rule out, for instance, that they are living creatures who have evolved the the ability to fly in space.It's a question of the evidence particular to the case - is there evidence that birds have evolved? Yes. Is there evidence that flying craft with aliens inside them evolved? No. If one lands on my lawn and some aliens walk out of it, I would assume unless some other evidence was produced that they designed and built it. If I'd never read about any evidence of evolution then I would probably assume that birds were either designed or just popped into existence somehow, but there is a wealth of evidence to support the idea that they evolved. We can go all round the houses but I'm not sure what your issue with that last part is.
On the other hand, if all we know about "flying saucers" is seeing them fly overhead (which is the context of Xianghua's thought experiment) we cannot rule out, for instance, that they are living creatures who have evolved the the ability to fly in space.
Silver Surfer?
sure that god can make the world by evolution since he can do anything he want. the question is if there is any real evidence for it or not.
Please, creationists cannot claim to use "logic". Speech is a minor part of our biological make up. And other apes can "speak" they just can't pass the information of complex thought through speech. You are grasping at straws. There are differences between all of the apes. There are far more similarities than differences.and apes cant speak but human can. the same logic.
That doesn't change the fact that every component of the human body (bones, muscles, nerves, etc.) has its counterpart in the bodies of apes, so anatomically we are apes. Also, apes communicate with each other by sound, although they can't form articulate words. Finally, basenjis can't bark - https://petcube.com/blog/dogs-dont-bark/- but that doesn't mean that they are not dogs.