Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just a FYI - the thread screen here is elongated. I don't have to scroll back and forth to do so - but it is stretched.Oh yea I don't catch that.
I couldn't agree more! Both organizations are a joke IMHO. They are competing to be the "Roman Catholics" of Messianic Judaism.
I'm well aware of that, which is why I asked the question. The portion I quoted made it sound like there are elements of ritual circumcision found in Scripture, but there aren't...Traditionally it's how a Bris is performed(mohel etc) which isn't found in scripture.
"taking away elements of the traditional service that are rabbinic and not scripturally founded"
No question about it. MJ [as a whole] has very little in common with traditional Judaism. This forum should make that abundantly clear. Having "Judaism" in the title was definitely a mistake, and is very misleading in my opinion.Perhaps the name Messianic Judaism was a mistake?
No question about it. MJ [as a whole] has very little in common with traditional Judaism. This forum should make that abundantly clear. Having "Judaism" in the title was definitely a mistake, and is very misleading in my opinion.
The title implies Judaism is not Messianic, which it is, and implies traditional Judaism recognizes Messianic Judaism as a legitimate branch of Judaism, which it doesn't. You can not get much more misleading than that.
Unfortunately, wishful thinking is as far as it will, or can, go. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for MJ taking on more of its parent's doctrines, but at the same time I'm a realist too. In many core doctrines they are very opposed to one another, and neither side will ever budge.I'm referring to in it's initial birth of the modern Messianic Jewish movement. There are organizations that are moving towards being more traditional Judaism. So to say the name is a mistake presently is not necessarily true as it pertains to being more traditional. Which could be Judaism+ Messianic doctrine or Messianic doctrine+ Judaism, depending on what the primary focus is.
Your making plenty of sense. Your just not being very realistic is all. And I most certainly share your desire for MJ to be closer to traditional Judaism. Nothing would make me happier.....if I'm making sense.
MadMaxData said:Your making plenty of sense. Your just not being very realistic is all. And I most certainly share your desire for MJ to be closer to traditional Judaism. Nothing would make me happier.
Seriously? How is that?I think I'm being more unbiased than you with all due respect, looking at both sides of the pendulum with honesty.
No question about it. MJ [as a whole] has very little in common with traditional Judaism. This forum should make that abundantly clear. Having "Judaism" in the title was definitely a mistake, and is very misleading in my opinion.
The title implies Judaism is not Messianic, which it is, and implies traditional Judaism recognizes Messianic Judaism as a legitimate branch of Judaism, which it doesn't. You can not get much more misleading than that.
The forum was named after the movement. The movement, though, should not be understood to reflect current realities. It is more of a hope.
From the late 1800's Jewish followers of Jesus went by the name "Hebrew Christian", and the religious practice was "Hebrew Christianity". Which is why I routinely apply that term to to people who reflect a priority on Christian theology, with a little bit of Jewish flair as an adjective.
It was in the 1970's when Jewish followers of Yeshua set as their goal the idea that we should embody a Judaism, with the addition of re-inviting Yeshua back into the Jewish fold. That was how we got the name "Messianic Judaism". It is a goal, not an end.
The forum was named after the movement. The movement, though, should not be understood to reflect current realities. It is more of a hope.
From the late 1800's Jewish followers of Jesus went by the name "Hebrew Christian", and the religious practice was "Hebrew Christianity". Which is why I routinely apply that term to to people who reflect a priority on Christian theology, with a little bit of Jewish flair as an adjective.
It was in the 1970's when Jewish followers of Yeshua set as their goal the idea that we should embody a Judaism, with the addition of re-inviting Yeshua back into the Jewish fold. That was how we got the name "Messianic Judaism". It is a goal, not an end.
Historically..From it's initial birth the modern Messianic Jewish movement came from Hebrew Christianity. The article compares the 2 well known organizations. I guess you can say that one group chooses to stay in it's Hebrew Christian roots and the other organization wants to move away and has been from it's Hebrew Christian roots.
Now what makes Hebrew Christian Messianic Judaism? The main think is Hebrew Christianity was IN the Church, part of the Church. There was a movement that wanted autonomy say to speak, so Messianic Judaism was created as a means for Jewish believers to maintain a higher level of Jewish identity.
ALthough both groups have had differing ways of evolving, it is thankfully the case that focusing on Yeshua has not led to fundamentally taking away from who He is as many have done in the name of Messianic Jewish culture. This is something many Messianic Jews - on both sides of the fence with UMJC and MJAA - have had to contend with when it comes to the goal of outreach, as they've noticed how often others who are counter-missionaries came in....said they were interested in being identified as Messianic Jewish/helping to bridge others with Judaism ...and yet in the end, the real goal was exposed that they never believed Yeshua was God nor did they want anything else except getting other Jews in the MJ Movement to begin advocating that Yeshua was not God incarnate.There are organizations that are moving towards being more traditional Judaism. So to say the name is a mistake presently is not necessarily true as it pertains to being more traditional. Which could be Judaism+ Messianic doctrine or Messianic doctrine+ Judaism, depending on what the primary focus is.
I'm for more of a balance with primary focus on the centrality of Yeshua then traditional Judaism, Which both groups in the article haven't gone or not going in my opinion.
Hi mishkan you have real life experience and I only have the people who I talk to that were there. Perhaps being from different regions makes a difference.
What I'm told is the goal wasn't Judaism but more of being able to autonomously maintain Jewish identity from the various denominations that Hebrew Christians were part of.
Hebrew Christians kept Passover as an example but was a separate thing from the Church. Now with Messianic Judaism completely autonomous and being able to have a Seder in the Messianic synagogue.
I'd like to say and this is important that the pioneer's I talked from what I'm told never in their wildest dreams that non Jews would be attracted.
What happens to movements is that different views start happening then you have Baptists, Lutheran etc.
I'm well aware of that, which is why I asked the question. The portion I quoted made it sound like there are elements of ritual circumcision found in Scripture, but there aren't...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?