• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Deadworm

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2016
1,061
714
77
Colville, WA 99114
✟75,813.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Single
When I first read the thread's title, I thought it was about Art Model, the controversial deceased owner of the Cleveland Browns, who on the one hand was very generous in his active support of social causes, but on the other hand was reviled by Christian residents of Cleveland for moving the team to Baltimore. Someone spit on his grace for this! So I had to scrap my preliminary research into Model and his detractors. I can't believe the OP fails to specify whether the model and painter are of opposite sexes.
 
Upvote 0

PollyJetix

Well-Known Member
Feb 15, 2017
1,128
1,241
Virginia
✟50,433.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I believe the OP mentions it was for a class, which would presumably include both males and female.

However, considering our day and age, I am surprised to see this particular objection.
With the LGBTQIA agenda in full swing, don't be surprised to see gay men enjoying painting a nude male.
 
Upvote 0

dms1972

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 26, 2013
5,193
1,364
✟725,698.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

A hunk is always a hunk of something, as a lump is always a lump of something. ;-) As a human being you're more than that.

Artists want to become proficient at rendering the human form in some medium, not putting 'hunkiness' (a subjective, emotional appraisal of someome else) on a page, for that reason it does not matter if the model is good looking or plain.

You seem to be engaging in an ad hominem and 'mind reading' by saying people who disagree are insecure, and cover that up with rationales for this being wrong. The reasons given if they are sound have to be considered in themselves without judging the individual.

I also disagree that this can be removed from the spiritual or religious realm. Why discuss it at all then. To so separate it is to abdicate the responsibility of developing a christian mind on these matters, something that is amongst christians very undeveloped.

Humans are spiritual and bodily creatures, made in God's Image and likeness. And I think that even in non-christians there is some aspect of the imprint of the Image of God remaining.

A drawing class is no doubt about being able gain confidence in drawing the human form, and in some areas of the medical professions that is necessary at times, though I would say less so since the advent of photography.

I would guess also that it would be counterproductive to good rendering to be caught up in a lustful fantasy, or a fit of giggles so if the artists career progress is on the line, they will not want to be immature about it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Johnnz

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2004
14,082
1,003
84
New Zealand
✟119,551.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
It is not a sin. A wrong view of nudity has been established from a poor exegesis of the early Genesis story. Many great Christian artists have painted nudes, thereby demonstrating a positive view of the human body.

Cranach was a "Reformation painter:' as Dad called him. Cranach was also a close friend of Martin Luther, and his nudes are proof that whatever else Luther was, he was no prude and would have been excoriated by American-style Evangelicals for encouraging his friend to produce the soft -core porn of that day. (source F Schaeffer)

John
NZ
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Sammy-San

Newbie
May 23, 2013
9,020
848
✟119,589.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

When people say marriage is a sacrament, what about in other time periods like Pre-Columbian America or other places like the islamic countries, where there isn't Christianity or Judaism?
 
Upvote 0

Sammy-San

Newbie
May 23, 2013
9,020
848
✟119,589.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

Isn't all nudity, except for a husband and a wife, shameful and stealing what isn't yours?
 
Upvote 0

Galatea

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2016
2,258
1,891
45
Alabama
✟77,581.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Isn't all nudity, except for a husband and a wife, shameful and stealing what isn't yours?
Art is different, in my opinion. It is not a photograph, or film of a real person. Art is representation of a real form. It's not a real person.

I think that is an important distinction. I realize there is some animated pornography- I'm not talking about that. I am talking about art.

His problem is, should he pose nude for an art class since he is a Christian and married.

Personally, if I were married, I would not want him to do it. And be insulted if he was okay with me doing it.
 
Reactions: wyatt1111
Upvote 0

Galatea

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2016
2,258
1,891
45
Alabama
✟77,581.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
When people say marriage is a sacrament, what about in other time periods like Pre-Columbian America or other places like the islamic countries, where there isn't Christianity or Judaism?
Sure, God gave marriage to the human family. He gave it to Adam and Eve and it persisted through the ages.
 
Reactions: wyatt1111
Upvote 0

Sammy-San

Newbie
May 23, 2013
9,020
848
✟119,589.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Sure, God gave marriage to the human family. He gave it to Adam and Eve and it persisted through the ages.

Do you find the definition of marriage confusing at all or not really? The rights/privileges/benefits/obligations that people had in the circumstances I mentioned are very different from what we have in America.
 
Upvote 0

Galatea

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2016
2,258
1,891
45
Alabama
✟77,581.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Do you find the definition of marriage confusing at all or not really? The rights/privileges/benefits/obligations that people had in the circumstances I mentioned are very different from what we have in America.
No, I don't find it confusing. I know people groups have changed marriage from what God originally intended- one man and one woman, but the institution survives- even in a perverted form. Even the Israelites practiced polygamy- which is not what God intended. So if God's people twisted marriage, it should come as no surprise that pagans changed the form, too.

I'm rather MORE amazed that so many cultures do define marriage as between one man and one woman. It sure has lasted a long time.
 
Upvote 0

Sammy-San

Newbie
May 23, 2013
9,020
848
✟119,589.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

I'm not talking about a man and a woman or multiple spouses, I'm talking about marriage itself. Do you think marriage is the same or different in other contexts? Like in the middle east or native americans in the past or indigneous cultures.
 
Upvote 0

LinkH

Regular Member
Jun 19, 2006
8,602
671
✟58,853.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It is a sin for a man to look on a woman to lust after him. We are told to pray 'lead us not into temptation.' Should we pray that, and then put ourselves in a situation to be tempted like that? The Bible also says to flee fornication.

For me personally, it would be a temptation to me, unless, possible, if I found the models absolutely and totally unattractive. I would imagine they do not get models like that for these classes. By tempted, I don't mean tempted to do anything with the models, but temptation in terms of being tempted to look with inappropriate desire. Would being a porn inspector who decides what materials come into a country be an appropriate job for a Christian? Probably not for most Christians, and not for porn of the opposite sex. But there would actually be a reason to perform this job. Artists can draw or paint something else.

There is a lot in the field of the arts that isn't acceptable for Christians. Art critics may love Venus de Milo, but this was probably the state of some false goddess, the sort of thing God would have had the Israelites destroy. Art is no excuse.

Acting is no excuse for blaspheming God, either. There are lots of challenges actors face where their work could conflict with their faith. Some fields are like that.
 
Upvote 0

1stcenturylady

Spirit-filled follower of Christ
Site Supporter
Feb 13, 2017
11,190
4,185
78
Tennessee
✟476,152.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
I love God foremost and I love art. I think it would be sinful to model in the nude.

1 John 5
19 And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness.

1 Thessalonians 5
22 Abstain from all appearance of evil.

Thank you for posting this verse. I had been looking for the second one, but couldn't think of a key word to look it up. Here it is again:

1 Thessalonians 5:22
"Abstain from all appearance of evil."

The next verse seems to apply also. 1 Thessalonians 5:23 "Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you completely; and may your whole spirit, soul, and body be preserved blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. 24 He who calls you is faithful, who also will do it."

I would think just asking the question is cause for alarm. His conscience is already at work.
 
Upvote 0

Zoii

Well-Known Member
Oct 13, 2016
5,811
3,984
24
Australia
✟111,705.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
I think a lil differently to Galatea but respect what she writes. For me its about intent. Its art class not a sex class so... You could be a model patient for a class of med /nursing students.... same thing. I think we should NOT focus on "what if I stimulate someone" and instead on the benefits of what you're doing for students.
 
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0

Martyr's Crown

Sunflower Jewel
Feb 10, 2017
1,928
2,477
42
The Netherlands
✟85,964.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I am not sure if it is sinful for a man, since your nude body is not likely to stimulate the ladies drawing you (no offense, women just imbibe pornography through the framework of a story and not so much as just seeing a naked man).

I think you stereotype all women as thinking the same as you and your friends, it would be the same as saying all men are doomed to get into pornography as well as sleep around with tonz of women just because they are ALL wired this way. There are many women out there who can also struggle with seeing men without a shirt, or just in a tiny swimsuit as well as in the nude. I myself don't like seeing other men without a shirt on, I don't feel comfortable with this. Except of my husband, of course.
 
Upvote 0

faroukfarouk

Fading curmudgeon
Apr 29, 2009
35,915
17,131
Canada
✟287,108.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Hi; so what do you think of people making anatomy drawings for medical study?

I guess that my underlying point is that context is important and that that there are always going to be grey areas.
 
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0

faroukfarouk

Fading curmudgeon
Apr 29, 2009
35,915
17,131
Canada
✟287,108.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I guess my point in post #59, above, is similar to yours.
 
Reactions: Zoii
Upvote 0