So...tell us, what happened when the Republican observers weren’t in the room?Officials lied about the observer in the room at all times. The Democrats at ABC and the Democrat election officials still need to compromise on one story. The Republican observers in Georgia were told the counting had stopped for the evening--that was a false statement. In other states Republican observers were harassed, removed, and blocked from observing.
Indeed, and why such effort to stop them from observing? It would be nice to get a copy of that pamphlet that was seen in Michigan about how to keep GOP observers away. The policy of observers in Michigan not signing out this election was something that at first went right by me. The audits might give us some answers.So...tell us, what happened when the Republican observers weren’t in the room?
So...nothing that we know of, more speculation.Indeed, and why such effort to stop them from observing? It would be nice to get a copy of that pamphlet that was seen in Michigan about how to keep GOP observers away. The policy of observers in Michigan not signing out this election was something that at first went right by me. The audits might give us some answers.
Indeed, and why such effort to stop them from observing? It would be nice to get a copy of that pamphlet that was seen in Michigan about how to keep GOP observers away.
Election night I was following the swing states and later focused on Michigan and also on Georgia. There was no reason to interfere with observers anywhere where there was no doubt as to who would win. There were court cases filed but no evidentiary hearings were allowed in regard to the treatment of observers. In Michigan what should have happened is that the court would allow video and hopefully audio to be brought in that would either support or refute the sworn affidavits. If I were a Democrat election official and any false accusations were made I would certainly push for the release of such videos to the press. Transparency is the key to determining the truth. Even where they were told not to sign out for this election a video would tell whether there were really Republican observers present at all times. I support jail time for anyone who filed a false affidavit. Since no such Michigan videos have been produced after all of these months a proper investigation/audit is warranted. This is why I am pleased that the Arizona audit has cameras going in real time so anyone with access to the Internet can observe.Don't you find it a little bit odd that, for all the talk about this pamphlet, no such pamphlet has ever been produced? That, despite all the talk about observers being assaulted, there are no actual recording or records to support that happening, even though many of the polling places actually have surveillance? That there are no court cases, no police reports, nothing to say such things actually happened, despite them allegedly happening all over the country?
Doesn't that seem just a little weird to you?
Election night I was following the swing states and later focused on Michigan and also on Georgia. There was no reason to interfere with observers anywhere where there was no doubt as to who would win. There were court cases filed but no evidentiary hearings were allowed in regard to the treatment of observers.
In Michigan what should have happened is that the court would allow video and hopefully audio to be brought in that would either support or refute the sworn affidavits. If I were a Democrat election official and any false accusations were made I would certainly push for the release of such videos to the press.
Transparency is the key to determining the truth. Even where they were told not to sign out for this election a video would tell whether there were really Republican observers present at all times. I support jail time for anyone who filed a false affidavit. Since no such Michigan videos have been produced after all of these months a proper investigation/audit is warranted. This is why I am pleased that the Arizona audit has cameras going in real time so anyone with access to the Internet can observe.
You're simply repeating propaganda, you don't know there were always Republican observers present except for Atlanta. If you have access to video from Cobo in Detroit and you can identify observers and prove Republican observers were always present and always able to observe each counter from within ten feet that would be a game changer. We can get some lip readers too. If witnesses testified falsely they should go to jail. Democrats and Republicans should be able to get together on this. Let's all work together and end all controversy.Of course not, because this alleged "mistreatment" had nothing to do with if the election was fair or not. There were always plenty of Republican observers in the room (the one possible exception being in Atlanta, Georgia) and even if they were "mistreated" it is not evidence that the election was not fair.
If these observers felt they were mistreated then they should have filed suit against the worker they felt mistreated them, even filing a police report against that worker. For some reason, none of these observers who claimed to be mistreated ever filed complaints against the worker; instead they merely complained about some worker, from what I saw, never saying who the worker was, in an affidavit claiming it proved some type of "election fraud" -- which you have also agreed is not evidence that any fraud occurred.
You have this backwards. The videos were livestreamed, they are already public, so there is nothing to "release." To substantiate their claims, they should be posting the video of what happened.
Again, the Michigan counting was livestreamed, the video is out there and available. This excuse of "transparency" is just that, an excuse that has no basis in fact. Yes, in the livestream you could not see the individual ballots, but you could see the large number of observers in the room and how they were treated.
You're simply repeating propaganda, you don't know there were always Republican observers present except for Atlanta. If you have access to video from Cobo in Detroit and you can identify observers and prove Republican observers were always present and always able to observe each counter from within ten feet that would be a game changer. We can get some lip readers too. If witnesses testified falsely they should go to jail. Democrats and Republicans should be able to get together on this. Let's all work together and end all controversy.
The Arizona Senate is dropping, for now, a controversial plan to go door-to-door to ask local residents about their voting history as part of its audit of Maricopa County's election.
I think a urinal is considered a toilet, and toilets have pipes attached. So something plumbing-related happened at 6:07 am and was repaired within two hours, according to reports..
You don't understand. They kept changing their story. First, it was everything was wet. Then, it was water had caused the damage. Then, it was H20. I even heard from another news source that it was agua. They couldn't keep their stories straight.
It is time to stop the Big Lie.Indeed, and why such effort to stop them from observing? It would be nice to get a copy of that pamphlet that was seen in Michigan about how to keep GOP observers away. The policy of observers in Michigan not signing out this election was something that at first went right by me. The audits might give us some answers.
The truth is that an experienced Republican observer stated that they told her that there was no sign out sheet for this election, as there had been in previous elections.So saying you can check the video is propaganda, but not the "evidence" you claim that, despite your propaganda, was actually examined in many courts and found it wasn't even strong enough to get to the evidentiary phase of trial. It was then appealed, and the appeals courts, including judges nominated by Pres. Trump, agreed with the lower court judges ruling (that the complaint did not offer enough probable cause to warrant a trial).
Again, if they were assaulted, why did they not fill out police reports? You ignore that there were maybe 1,000 Republicans trying to be observers in Michigan, which makes it obvious why so many were denied entry and many did not understand about sign in sheets (or where to find it), after the Republican Party realized they didn't have enough observers there and posted on social media for Republicans to come to work as observers (Republicans that had no training at all, which led to large numbers of affidavits that alleged that the procedure proscribed by law was "fraudulent").
I'm sorry, you post nothing but propaganda here, most of which we've refuted multiple times.
That is baloney.Prove it.Then they revealed it was really Dihydrogen Monoxide, a substance found in cancerous tumors and polluted rivers! So clearly there was an effort made to poison the Republican observers.
The truth is that an experienced Republican observer stated that they told her that there was no sign out sheet for this election, as there had been in previous elections.
Greetings Mr Poe
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?