To be clear, people who are concerned about the safety and efficacy of vaccines are not "anti-vaxxers", which is pejorative. In fact, most of them were very pro-vaxx given that their children had been vaccinated until one or more of them suffered a life-ending or life-altering injuring. So the correct term would be "ex-vaxxer".
Because there are risks to every medical intervention including vaccines, there must be choice. To force someone or their child to be vaccinated against their will is a violation of both human rights and the Geneva Convention. This is the type of thing the Nazi's did and why protections are necessary.
As to the tired and worn-out bumper sticker slogan, "safe and effective, safe and effective, safe and effective", consider these facts:
There has never been a true double blind placebo controlled study of any vaccine
The vaccine schedule has never been tested for safety and efficacy
In spite of recommendations to get them, no vaccine has ever been tested on pregnant women (recently admitted to in court documents by the FDA)
There have been zero long-term studies of any vaccine. The average trial lasts somewhere around 5 DAYS!
The drug companies have zero liability as per the 1986 vaccine shield law that was signed by Pres.Reagan
As a result of that law, HHS was required to conduct vaccine safety studies and submit a report to congress every 2 years. According to recent court documents, HHS has not conducted a SINGLE safety study since 1986!
After 1986, the vaccine schedule expoded
View attachment 252030View attachment 252030
The US has one of the worst IMR in the developed world. And there is a direct correlation to the vaccine schedule
Notice that Scandinavian countries only require 11-13 vaccines during that same period and you don't hear about kids dying of "vaccine preventable diseases".
Most childhood infections in the developed world are mild and provide lifetime immunity. Vaccines don't provide lifetime immunity and require constant injections. In addition, wild infections reduce the risk of other more dangerous health problems later in life including cancer. Mumps for example reduces women's risk of developing ovarian cancer.
Mumps and ovarian cancer: modern interpretation of an historic association
Mumps parotitis may lead to expression and immune recognition of a tumor-associated form of MUC1 and create effective immune surveillance of ovarian cancer cells that express this form of MUC1.
And measles virus is currently being used to cure certain types of cancer.
Most people don't know anything objective about vaccines. Instead they trust the pharmaceutical industry that profits from them, the government agencies like FDA and CDC with their revolving doors, TV and print news which controls content through advertising dollars (about 70% of all TV news revenues come from the drug companies), the medical establishment that also has a vested interest in vaccinations, etc. You have to be willing to spend hours of research to learn the truth. But people are waking up, and that's what's scares the vaccine industry. Hence, we have all these bills around the country to prevent people from exercising medical freedom. Today it's vaccines. Tomorrow it's something else. Do we really want to go down that road?
